D
dvdjs
Guest
That does not give a reason why murderers should not be punished.From above:
That does not give a reason why murderers should not be punished.From above:
The reason seems to be that it wouldn’t be politically expedient to punish killers. However nobody will explicitly say that. I would say wanting justice for those involved in killing is a very reasonable position.I fully understand what you are saying. I also fully understand that you are not giving a reason for your view. You come close, but seem to hold back. Not clear why that is.
I don’t think that seeing abortion as murder, or punishing those involved in murder are extreme views.
That is what you want to hear, so you can’t understand anything else. It’s okay, anyone who comes to these boards occasionally see how you and dvd twist things around, and this is just another example of it.The reason seems to be that it wouldn’t be politically expedient to punish killers
Which other killers deserve charity? For example, many members of minority groups have suffered discrimination and have been brought up in an immoral leftist culture, should we not punish them for murder?stinkcat_14:![]()
That is what you want to hear, so you can’t understand anything else. It’s okay, anyone who comes to these boards occasionally see how you and dvd twist things around, and this is just another example of it.The reason seems to be that it wouldn’t be politically expedient to punish killers
Clearly my position isn’t due to political expediency, but rather charity for a woman brought up in an immoral leftist culture.
I
So how do we determine which killers get punished and which killers get a free pass?Who doesn’t deserve charity?
Roe v Wade said every one gets a free pass.So how do we determine which killers get punished and which killers get a free pass?
Do you support Roe v wade? If you don’t do you think women having abortions should be pushed or should they get a free pass? Which other killers should get a free pass?stinkcat_14:![]()
Roe v Wade said every one gets a free pass.So how do we determine which killers get punished and which killers get a free pass?
Advocating punishing the women is effectively a pro-abortion argument, since the populace would never allow it.I don’t think that seeing abortion as murder, or punishing those involved in murder are extreme views.
Advocating against it is either an argument that abortion is not murder or that women lack agency.Advocating punishing the women is effectively a pro-abortion argument
https://forums.catholic-questions.org/t/trump-picks-the-judge-who-will-keep-him-out-of-jail/497012/100?u=robertmidwestDo you support Roe v wade? If you don’t do you think women having abortions should be pushed or should they get a free pass?
Totally false statement. Just because one believes in justice for murderers does not make one liberal.False choice. Liberals like to put up the “punish the women” straw man knowing full well it will never happen. The objective, of course, is to put up a phony argument in favor of abortion, the #1 Dem cause.
It is an accurate choice that covers all the bases.False choice.
The objective of course it to putting words into other people’s mouths.Liberals like to put up … The objective, of course, is …
What about justice?stinkcat_14:![]()
https://forums.catholic-questions.org/t/trump-picks-the-judge-who-will-keep-him-out-of-jail/497012/100?u=robertmidwestDo you support Roe v wade? If you don’t do you think women having abortions should be pushed or should they get a free pass?
On another note…there is no reason to push them either.
What is pushing them going to do?What about justice?