Deteriorating species

  • Thread starter Thread starter Della
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It is not a fraudulent claim. Condoms are promoting sex without responsibility. Abstinence promotes the good of the other.

Uganda is a success.
Sex is probably about the only pleasure most Africans get, and with condoms they could practice it safely.

It’s also worth noting that abstinence promotes masturbation and kerb crawling, not to mention sexual repression which manifests itself in bizarre fetishism and other forms of “immorality”.
 
Sex is probably about the only pleasure most Africans get, and with condoms they could practice it safely.

It’s also worth noting that abstinence promotes masturbation and kerb crawling, not to mention sexual repression which manifests itself in bizarre fetishism and other forms of “immorality”.
You are too funny. :rotfl: Condoms are not safe. Condoms have holes.

Just a snippet:

A spokesman from the London Rubber Company (Durex) admitted that if incorrectly used, the failure rate of condoms could be anything from 25% up to 100%, and there are real problems with teaching people how to use them

Another study of partners using condoms suggests that the risk of catching HIV is reduced by 85%. That sounds excellent, but it is not. If you persist in sleeping regularly with someone who is positive or with numbers of unknown people who are possibly positive, then eventually, condom or no condom, you may get AIDS. Vaginal or anal sex using a condom is not a low-risk or no-risk activity. It carries a medium risk at best.

World Health Organisation: `**The most effective way to prevent sexual transmission of HIV is to abstain, or for two people who are not infected to be faithful to one another. **Alternatively, the correct use of a condom will reduce the risk significantly.’

In other words the WHO agrees with the Catholic Church.
 
You are too funny. :rotfl: Condoms are not safe. Condoms have holes.

Just a snippet:

A spokesman from the London Rubber Company (Durex) admitted that if incorrectly used, the failure rate of condoms could be anything from 25% up to 100%, and there are real problems with teaching people how to use them

Another study of partners using condoms suggests that the risk of catching HIV is reduced by 85%. That sounds excellent, but it is not. If you persist in sleeping regularly with someone who is positive or with numbers of unknown people who are possibly positive, then eventually, condom or no condom, you may get AIDS. Vaginal or anal sex using a condom is not a low-risk or no-risk activity. It carries a medium risk at best.

World Health Organisation: `**The most effective way to prevent sexual transmission of HIV is to abstain, or for two people who are not infected to be faithful to one another. **Alternatively, the correct use of a condom will reduce the risk significantly.’

In other words the WHO agrees with the Catholic Church.
Not really. The WHO stopped short of advising against using condoms.

As for condoms not being foolproof, I agree. So what? You want the final word on whether or not we do anything to be an iron clad guarantee of zero casualites? If so, I suggest you stay in bed and fill your bedroom with cotton wool and bubble wrap.

I could be killed driving my Subarhu Impreza to work tomorrow. Does that mean I should stay at home?

Condoms vastly reduce your chances of catching HIV. To rule them out as a method of protection during intercourse is utter folly.

I’ll tell you one thing that will make any religion fail in the long run, and that is prating at people not to have sex.

I note that you’ve failed to address my other point, that sexual repression leads to sexual immorality.
 
And what about the man, like me, who is so disposed as to be unable to believe? What evil deeds has he committed?
I couldn’t possibly say. I don’t know you nor what personal sins you have committed or why. That’s for God to judge, not me or even the Church. The Church has never named anyone as being in hell only in heaven. Apparently, you didn’t know that.
I’m talking about Exodus, Deuteronomy and Leveticus. Part of your bible still, I believe, as well as the Protestant and Jewish bibles.
We don’t live in OT times nor does the Church live by the Levitical laws. The time of Israel having to fend off the heathen no longer exists. God isn’t going to ask us what we’d have done 5000 years ago, only what we did with the time we were given.
The Catholic Church has explicitly condemned the use of condoms in missions to Africa and even made the fraudulent claim that they increase the spread of HIV.
Of course it has–it’s condemned the use of condoms for all Catholics everywhere. And condom use can increase the spread of HIV if it engenders a casual attitude that encourages infidelity, which it has. There are reliable statistics that bear this out. If you’re interested you should look them up.
I was actually referring to the last millennium as a whole, and the world is a lot bigger than Europe you realise?
Um, no. We were talking about the Dark Ages. You made the claim about millions of women being condemned as witches. Unless you have reliable documentation to back up your claims? I highly doubt you do.
Really? Maybe it’s only in Scotland it’s done. Catholics here set up direct debits so that a percentage of their earnings go to the Chruch.
So? Lots of people do that. We do that here, too, but the Church doesn’t “demand” we do. It’s just easier for some people to donate through direct debit. Why shouldn’t they?
Firstly, I am not anti Catholic. If you can’t stand by the deeds committed by your Church, the good deeds and the questionable ones, then you are only fooling yourself when you claim to be a Catholic.
My Church has never committed any questionable deeds. Certainly various members of the Church have. Like many other misinformed people you seem to think our leaders claim impeccability for themselves. They don’t and never have. From Peter on down to today no Catholic leader has ever been perfect and some have been downright stinkers. What the Church claims is infallibility in matters of faith and morals. That’s it, and nothing more.
By your standards none of the gospels is the word of Christ since they were all collated well after his death based on interpretations of what he and his disciples are alleged to have said. There is not one single primary historical source on what the man Jesus Christ said. The Bible roughly as it is today was edited and botched together with a number of paganistic concepts by a committee at the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D.
Collated isn’t the same thing as written. The Gospels, except for John, were all written within 70 years of Jesus’ ascension. Of course the books of the Bible were copied and translated, but that doesn’t automatically denote unreliability. Many ancient writers have been copied and translated and yet no one doubts they are reliable. The Bible was hardly “botched together” nor were “paganistic concepts” added to it. The Bible was translated into Latin by St. Jerome and two female assistants. As I wrote in my last post, you really need to learn real history not the skewed version you have read somewhere. I recommend the online Catholic encyclopedia which is very honest about the history of the Church and the societies in which it has functioned (it’s not the very latest version, but it’s still reliable regarding everything up to the early 20th century, which is good enough for our purposes).

And now, if you don’t mind, let’s get back to the topic of the thread. I won’t respond to any more posts that aren’t directly about the thread topic for two reasons: firstly, because it’s why I started the thread, and secondly because I won’t go around and around with someone who obviously knows so little about the Church he is criticizing–it’s an exercise in futility if you aren’t interested in learning the truth. Just being honest with you, not nasty. 😉
 
I couldn’t possibly say. I don’t know you nor what personal sins you have committed or why. That’s for God to judge, not me or even the Church. The Church has never named anyone as being in hell only in heaven. Apparently, you didn’t know that.
Actually, I’ve heard from plenty of memebers of various Churches including the Catholic Church that I’m going to hell. I’m only saddened that there isn’t actually a hell for these prating, swivel-eyed hypocrites to go to.
We don’t live in OT times nor does the Church live by the Levitical laws. The time of Israel having to fend off the heathen no longer exists. God isn’t going to ask us what we’d have done 5000 years ago, only what we did with the time we were given.
Then why are these still part of the Catholic Bible?
Of course it has–it’s condemned the use of condoms for all Catholics everywhere. And condom use can increase the spread of HIV if it engenders a casual attitude that encourages infidelity, which it has. There are reliable statistics that bear this out. If you’re interested you should look them up.
I’m not. My Interest in sex is of a more consensual and tactile nature than an intellectual one. I shan’t bore you with the details of my pecadillos.

What I am getting at is that Africans and for that matter any normal human being with blood in his or her veins is not going to stop having sex. Condoms lower the risk. It’s simple.
Um, no. We were talking about the Dark Ages.
We? You mean you. I was talking about Christianity, which has been around since the antiquity.
You made the claim about millions of women being condemned as witches. Unless you have reliable documentation to back up your claims? I highly doubt you do.
I’ll admit that there are confliciting accounts on the number. The highest estimate I saw was nine million, but even apologists for the Church admit that the number is into tens and hundreds of thousands.
So? Lots of people do that. We do that here, too, but the Church doesn’t “demand” we do. It’s just easier for some people to donate through direct debit. Why shouldn’t they?
Why should they? The Vatican is rich beyond imagination, and most people have to work hard for what little they have.
My Church has never committed any questionable deeds.
I see. There seems little point in further discourse. Good luck to you.
:
 
Actually, I’ve heard from plenty of memebers of various Churches including the Catholic Church that I’m going to hell. I’m only saddened that there isn’t actually a hell for these prating, swivel-eyed hypocrites to go to.

Then why are these still part of the Catholic Bible?

I’m not. My Interest in sex is of a more consensual and tactile nature than an intellectual one. I shan’t bore you with the details of my pecadillos.

What I am getting at is that Africans and for that matter any normal human being with blood in his or her veins is not going to stop having sex. Condoms lower the risk. It’s simple.

We? You mean you. I was talking about Christianity, which has been around since the antiquity.

I’ll admit that there are confliciting accounts on the number. The highest estimate I saw was nine million, but even apologists for the Church admit that the number is into tens and hundreds of thousands.

Why should they? The Vatican is rich beyond imagination, and most people have to work hard for what little they have.

I see. There seems little point in further discourse. Good luck to you.
:
Again, the success in Uganda is attributed to change in sexual behavior. In other words a higher morality, not a lower one. As you are an atheist perhaps your accepted standard of morality is lower.
 
Again, the success in Uganda is attributed to change in sexual behavior. In other words a higher morality, not a lower one. As you are an atheist perhaps your accepted standard of morality is lower.
Funnily enough, the stats I’ve checked into on Uganda seem to mention increased condom use as one of the reasons for the decline of AIDS in Uganda, with abstinence being only one of several factors involved.
 
There seems little point in further discourse. Good luck to you.
:
That’s right. Because you’re not interested in what I am saying to you, which is evidenced by your editing out responses you don’t want to see. I hold no animosity towards you and wish you all the best. I just think it a shame you aren’t willing to learn anything beyond your misconceptions. 😦
 
Funnily enough, the stats I’ve checked into on Uganda seem to mention increased condom use as one of the reasons for the decline of AIDS in Uganda, with abstinence being only one of several factors involved.
Let’s take these in order:
  1. Abstinence - most effective
  2. Faithful to partner - more effective
  3. Condom use one partner - somewhat effective
  4. Condom use many partners - not effective
So why should the Church advocate the third versus the first? Makes no sense.
 
That’s right. Because you’re not interested in what I am saying to you, which is evidenced by your editing out responses you don’t want to see.
Newsflash. I do not have admin priveleges on this forum. I could not edit your posts even if I wanted to, you’re being absurd.
I hold no animosity towards you and wish you all the best. I just think it a shame you aren’t willing to learn anything beyond your misconceptions. 😦
Ditto.
 
Let’s take these in order:
  1. Abstinence - most effective
  2. Faithful to partner - more effective
  3. Condom use one partner - somewhat effective
  4. Condom use many partners - not effective
So why should the Church advocate the third versus the first? Makes no sense.
Sources?
 
You actually need a source to show you abstinence is the most effective?

Your claim is that multiple partner condom sex is more effective than abstinence?

What a waste of time this is.
Yes, I don’t believe a word that comes out of your mendacious mouth, and I want you to provide sources.

I can understand why this could be a problem for you, but unless you can prove your assertion that condoms have nothing to do with the decrease in HIV in Uganda, I don’t believe you. You are far too unreliable, no to mention intellectually mediocre.
 
Pop culture media will cause dramatic population decreases. Most people will become entertainment junkies to the point that we will become soft feelgooders who grow intolerant of marriage and kids. And the U.S. is leading by example. It’s a shame the rest of the world, especially Europe, can’t see that we’re really not as liberal as the media entertainment propaganda would have them believe.
 
Pop culture media will cause dramatic population decreases. Most people will become entertainment junkies to the point that we will become soft feelgooders who grow intolerant of marriage and kids. And the U.S. is leading by example. It’s a shame the rest of the world, especially Europe, can’t see that we’re really not as liberal as the media entertainment propaganda would have them believe.
That’s certainly a factor. We have definitely become overly self-occupied and intolerant of anything that requires a bit of effort, except for keeping fit (so we look good in clothes) and that sort of thing. I just feel like as apostate Westerners our society has become so jaded we seem to be weary of life so we don’t want to engender new life. 🤷
 
Let’s take these in order:
  1. Abstinence - most effective
  2. Faithful to partner - more effective
  3. Condom use one partner - somewhat effective
  4. Condom use many partners - not effective.
Buffalo, what you cite makes sense in the abstract. But do such claims hold up in the real world? My memory is a bit hazy, but as I recall abstinence programs in Uganda worked well for school age persons, but not for adults. Sex was seen as a right for adults, and so a “zero grazing” (or fidelity to one partner) policy is what worked best in that country.
So why should the Church advocate the third versus the first? Makes no sense.
I’m not sure that the Church necessarily has to advocate the third choice. I think most complaints are that the Church opposes the third choice. Do you see the difference?
 
I know I helped pull the thread off topic, but I’d like to get back to it. So, could those discussing side issues please start new threads to discuss them? Thanks, guys! 🙂
 
I heated my kettle to boiling point and poured two cups of water, praying to the blessed virign over one of them and leaving the other in my spare room. I repeated the experiment several times, praying to different Gods.
I thought God was supposed to be open to prayers from anyone?
So are you admitting you have a personal relationship with Him. If not why would you pray to Him? :hmmm:
I don’t.
The adversarial tone tells me that you are trolling.
The inconsistancy in your own answers tells me you are not telling us the truth.
I don’t believe a word that comes out of your mendacious mouth, and I want you to provide sources.
I wouldn’t believe anyone else if I were you either.
 
I know I helped pull the thread off topic, but I’d like to get back to it. So, could those discussing side issues please start new threads to discuss them? Thanks, guys! 🙂
OK, back to the source…

We cannot go extinct.
We have souls that are immortal.
We continue on.

So with the creation of the first human, the species is set forever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top