F
frommi
Guest
Me too. But to which part of “this” are you referring?
Is your confusion about why people are so interested in his retirement?
Or, perhaps it is because of the drama that arose out of this drawn out process (abbreviated below):
*]Suggesting to news media that he might not offer his letter of recommendation on time because it would get accepted with much haste.
*]Quietly petition Vatican for permission to delay retirement and continue service as Auxiliary Bishop.
*]Announce 60 year-old abuse claim while promoting removal of statutes of limitation for abuse victims.
*]Announcing submission of retirement papers.
*]Hasty acceptance of retirement request (as predicted in 1).
I think that the second possibility has much to do with the first. He himself made a spectacle out of this normal event.
I just mean that it means…nothing substantial.
It would be one thing if he was the leader of a major see that would be experiencing significant transition or something.
But the man has had no real archdiocesean responsibilities for years (at his request btw).
So aside from becoming an ‘auxiliary bishop emeritus’, what exactly changes here?