S
Scaun
Guest
Yes, He had.
Hello Robertanthony,I think JP2 adressed the question of the actual existence of the fires of Hell shortly before 2000, and he commented that they weren’t real fires. I don’t know in what context he said that, if he really did say that, and if that’s binding for us Catholics. And God did prepare Hell for Satan and the myriad of angels who chose him over God, that’s a fact. There’s an abyss between Heaven and Hell, no damned could behold the Trinity if he wanted too. Some people think that Hell will be a place for sinners to engage in sin and pleasures of the senses, and that there’ll be an element of fun, and that the whole of their torment will be to not ever again be in the presence of God, whom their soul recognized as their only good once they died and faced personal judgment. I like to think that’s the case, or that their suffering will gradually decrease over eternity and that “only” the pain of loss will remain, but I think it’s not likely that either scenario will happen.
My personal opionion is that satan has done a wonderful job of tricking man to doubt in hell. this will of course gain him more people. Looking at the CCC several areas continue to affirm that everyone will rise at the end and have incoruptable bodies.Hello Robertanthony,
Thank you for your contribution to the discussion. I did research your comment about Pope John Paul the Great and the results is creating a problem of understanding for me. I hope some people can iron these things out for me here.
I did not find exactly what you are referencing but will continue to search. But, after what I did find, it would not surprise me that he did express that understanding. I came upon three Wednesday audiences dated 1991. I think they were consecutive, but, I will be back with the link. One of them is dated 21 July 1991. I am very surprised by what he said. According to the Pope hell does not exist and is a state of the soul. This of course is contrary to the Bible. The Pope writes that the biblical references are metaphorical to the spiritual realm. The only way that I could agree with the Pope is by understanding that this understanding was revealed to him in a personal revelation. Saint Augustine wrote that he would not speculate where hell is, that only by a revelation can we come to know it’s location. To come to, what I would describe as a revolutionary understanding of hell as that which the Pope presented in his audiences I would think could only be by private revelation not by deduction or even simple spiritual understanding that may arrive from spiritual growth.
In three controversial Wednesday Audiences, Pope John Paul II pointed out that the essential characteristic of heaven, hell or purgatory is that they are states of being of a spirit (angel/demon) or human soul, rather than places, as commonly perceived and represented in human language. ewtn.com/library/papaldoc/jp2heavn.htm
I find that if the Pope is incorrect it is problematic to present such an understanding because I see that such an understand demeans spiritual understanding and creates obstacles for people to come to know God. It facilitates presenting and viewing spiritual truths as abstract realities. To say, that it is much easier to then go on to day or based on this claim to deduce that Satan does not exist - as many already do. NOt to mention such an understanding of heaven, hell and purgatory poses other problems for people who are seeking God.
Any thoughts?
Peace,
Abba