S
Socrates4Jesus
Guest
Thanks, Indy (are you from Indianapolis)?
Thanks, Indy (are you from Indianapolis)?
Did and still do.I’ve heard that some Mormon prophets said that God the Father was once a human being just as you and i are. Is it true that they taught this?
Yah, but I had a teenage crush on the original handsome Starbuck.MJF:
We’re all hijackers, here!
I think Starbuck makes a much more intriguing character when played by a female actor.
Yep, a pretty disappointed Colts fanThanks, Indy (are you from Indianapolis)?
Maybe next year! Go Colts!Yep, a pretty disappointed Colts fan![]()
The answer goes further back. You will find it in these verses:Yes, i understand. Still, there are those who were decieved who genuinely repented. So, i’m still looking for an answer to my question: What reason does Mormon give that those who were at first deceived changed their minds and believed the truth? I believe verse 2 has the answer, but what do you think that answer is?
1 And now behold, there was not a living soul among all the people of the Nephites who did doubt in the least the words of all the holy prophets who had spoken; for they knew that it must needs be that they must be fulfilled. 2 And they knew that it must be expedient that Christ had come, because of the many signs which had been given, according to the words of the prophets; and because of the things which had come to pass already they knew that it must needs be that all things should come to pass according to that which had been spoken. 3 Therefore they did forsake all their sins, and their abominations, and their whoredoms, and did serve God with all diligence day and night. (3 Nephi)
The reason why they “knew” is because they had repented. In a sense, it would be correct to say that they always “knew”. But they (or some of them) had chosen to follow the ways of Satan and disbelieve it. But after they had repented, they returned to their former true belief.Zer:
I apologize! I think i did not phrase the question correctly. Let me see if i can ask it clearly this time:
My question is this: Why did “they knew that it must be expedient that Christ had come”? Does not Mormon answer the question by saying that the reason why is “because of the many signs which had been given, according to the words of the prophets; and because of the things which had come to pass already”?
In other words, am i correct that verse 2 has both the question and the answer to the question? Please read it again:
And they knew that it must be expedient that Christ had come, because of the many signs which had been given, according to the words of the prophets; and because of the things which had come to pass already they knew that it must needs be that all things should come to pass according to that which had been spoken. (3 Nephi 5:2)
Yes, they repented (or changed their minds). They repented of their lack of faith in the coming of Christ. The question is, why did they repent? My thought is that the question why is answered by the the phrase beginning with the word because.The reason why they “knew” is because they had repented. In a sense, it would be correct to say that they always “knew”. But they (or some of them) had chosen to follow the ways of Satan and disbelieve it. But after they had repented, they returned to their former true belief.
zerinus
They had received those signs and wonders, and initially believed them, before they turned wicked and stopped believing them. But as a result of the preaching of Lachoneus, and the threat to their lives they faced from the robbers, they repented, and returned to their original belief. That I think is made clear in the text. I don’t know why you seem to have difficulty accepting that.Yes, they repented (or changed their minds). They repented of their lack of faith in the coming of Christ. The question is, why did they repent? My thought is that the question why is answered by the the phrase beginning with the word because.
Please read and tell me what Mormon says in verse 2:
And they knew that it must be expedient that Christ had come, because of the many signs which had been given, according to the words of the prophets; and because of the things which had come to pass already they knew that it must needs be that all things should come to pass according to that which had been spoken.*(3 Nephi 5:2)*What does verse 2 mean, Zer? Please give me your honest opinion.
Yes, i believe these are reasons they repented and believed in Jesus Christ, but not the only reasons, as verse 2 gives additional reasons why they believed.They had received those signs and wonders, and initially believed them, before they turned wicked and stopped believing them. But as a result of the preaching of Lachoneus, and the threat to their lives they faced from the robbers, they repented, and returned to their original belief. That I think is made clear in the text. I don’t know why you seem to have difficulty accepting that.
zerinus
I think I know what you are getting at here. Okay, I will go along with that.Yes, i believe these are reasons they repented and believed in Jesus Christ, but not the only reasons, as verse 2 gives additional reasons why they believed.
Perhaps if i tell you what 3 Nephi 5:2 means to me, you will be able to see what i mean. If you get my meaning and see that i have erred, i hope you will point out where i misunderstand the meaning of verse 2:
(1a) “And they knew that it must be expedient that Christ had come …”
means
(1b) They knew Jesus would come to them
and
(2a) “… because of the many signs which had been given, according to the words of the prophets …”
means
(2b) The reason why they knew Jesus would come to them is that they had witnessed, with their own eyes, the predictions the prophets made about the future actually come true …
and
(3a) “… and because of the things which had come to pass already they knew that it must needs be that all things should come to pass according to that which had been spoken.”
means
(3b) Since those predictions of the future came true, they knew the other prediction, that is, the prediction that Jesus would soon come to them, would also come true.
I’m not denying that the struggles with their enemies and the powerful preaching of God’s spokesperson played a role in their conversion. I’m not denying the power of the Spirit of God to convict them of the guilt of their sin of unbelief played a role. I’m just saying that, in addition to these, the evidence of the predictions of the future coming true also played a role in their repentance and putting their faith in Jesus Christ. I think this is what Mormon is teaching in verse 2, do you?
You are no burden at all. Sorry for the delay, but I do have other things to do! Can’t always reply immediately as you posts.I don’t want to become too much of a burden to you, Zer. If you are weary of trying to explain chapter 5 to me, just let me know, and i’ll move on to another chapter. I do appreciate your patience in answering my questions, but don’t want to expect too much of you.
![]()
Yes, I reject the Book of Mormon on historical and scientific grounds. Not only that, but I found it to be an uninteresting read. I don’t think I ever read more than thirty pages, and it was a struggle to get that far. To go a step further, I reject it on spiritual grounds.Thanks for your opinion, MJF. From what i understand (and my understanding might not be complete), Zer seems to be saying that the following truths can be discerned by the work of the Holy Spirit on you or i, despite any additional, objective evidence supporting them:
(A) Mathematical truths(B) Observational truths(C) Testimonial truths(D) Historical truths(E) Scientific truths(F) Emotional truths(G) Moral truths(H) Metaphysical truthsYou appear to be saying that there is no historical evidence or archaeological evidence to support the Book of Mormon, so one cannot say that it has (D), nor can one say that there are any (E) to demonstrate it accurately depicts ancient history. So, the Book of Mormon should be rejected on historical and scientific grounds. Is this what you are saying?
I can only assume from your question that you have never recieved communication from God before – or at least are not sure if you did or not.How do you know the answer is coming from God? How do you know the feeling isn’t simply an emotional reaction caused by a suggestion of the missionaries? Or from the enemy?
That’s been my experience as regards the BoM. I prayed sincerely in faith whether the BoM is true: in seminary, throughout my mission, before and after my temple marriage. I never got a recognizable answer one way or another despite my faith, sincerity, and growing desperation. God was utterly silent. I had to use other means to find truth - reason, the weight of the evidence, logic. Now I’m enrolled in RCIA.Are you suggesting that a sincere prayer to God will be ignored and not answered?