Did Joseph Smith ever quote from the Book of Mormon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BartBurk
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can only assume from your question that you have never recieved communication from God before – or at least are not sure if you did or not.

If God wishes to speak to His children He will surely make a way for us to understand that the communication is from Him. I have certainly felt the Spirit and Power of God before and it is unmistakably from Him.

What a powerful way to find truth – go to the source. Are you suggesting that a sincere prayer to God will be ignored and not answered?
On the contrary, I have felt the Power and comforting presence of God. I do believe he can communicate with you in a personal and moving way. I have experienced this in moments of fervent prayer before Mass. I experienced this when I prayed the Lord’s prayer for the first time.

I would suspect the burning in the bosom in connection with the BoM, as I do not believe this to be a work of God.

Michael
 
That’s been my experience as regards the BoM. I prayed sincerely in faith whether the BoM is true: in seminary, throughout my mission, before and after my temple marriage. I never got a recognizable answer one way or another despite my faith, sincerity, and growing desperation. God was utterly silent. I had to use other means to find truth - reason, the weight of the evidence, logic. Now I’m enrolled in RCIA.
I hope you’re enjoying RCIA as much as I did. Good luck in your journey home.

Michael
 
From one who has experienced an unmistakable answer from God, I can say with surety that He does hear and answer prayers and that we can discern the truth through Him.

Reason and logic can certainly draw us closer to Him but to know that God is actually there can only be revealed through by God directly to us.
 
On the contrary, I have felt the Power and comforting presence of God. I do believe he can communicate with you in a personal and moving way. I have experienced this in moments of fervent prayer before Mass. I experienced this when I prayed the Lord’s prayer for the first time.

I would suspect the burning in the bosom in connection with the BoM, as I do not believe this to be a work of God.

Michael
Thank for your response Michael.

I not sure I understand your response though. If you have recieved the comforting presence of God then you know what it feels like. You seem sincere in your response in regards to this feeling so why would you question a person’s ability to recieve answers to prayer from God?

You state that you do not believe the BofM is the word of God and based on your assumption seem to be willing to discount communication from God regarding the matter. Our personal belief in something really is irrelevant to whether something is true or not.

Respectfully,
Steve Erickson

Respectfully,
Steve Erickson
 
Thank for your response Michael.

I not sure I understand your response though. If you have received the comforting presence of God then you know what it feels like. You seem sincere in your response in regards to this feeling so why would you question a person’s ability to receive answers to prayer from God?

You state that you do not believe the BoM is the word of God and based on your assumption seem to be willing to discount communication from God regarding the matter. Our personal belief in something really is irrelevant to whether something is true or not.

Respectfully,
Steve Erickson

Respectfully,
Steve Erickson
My argument is that God would not confirm a falsehood. I believe in objective truth. I don’t see how anyone can argue the Book of Mormon is true. First, the credibility of Joseph Smith is in serious question. An honest look at his complete history will show he has serious character flaws, even after he claims to have seen God. I don’t know about you, but if I’d seen God face to face as Smith claimed, I’d be flying straight and true from then on out. That doesn’t appear to be the case here. Second, the story of how Joseph Smith found the Gold Plates, translated them, then had the gold plates mysteriously taken back up to heaven, defies all logic - it strains credulity. Lastly, there is a complete lack of evidence for anything in the BoM. No evidence of the Nephite civilization. No evidence of the Lamanites. No evidence of reformed Egyptian or any ancient Hebrew in the new world. No evidence of a huge, cataclysmic battle, nothing. DNA evidence showing the Native American’s are of Asian descent, not Hebrew. And it’s not for lack of trying. The LDS church has spent millions trying to prove the historicity of the BoM.
Given all of this, I think it’s safe to argue the following.
Mormon missionaries give you the BoM and tell you to read it and pray about it. They promise you that if it’s true and you pray with a sincere heart the Holy Ghost will bear witness to the truth. You pray and receive a burning in the bosom or some experience you interpret to be the Holy Ghost. There are several possibilities.
A. It’s true, the Holy Ghost told you so. (I find this interpretation highly unlikely.)
B. You were expecting to receive something and your mind supplied something. (emotional response)
C. You did indeed have a spiritual answer, but it was not of God.
The Holy Spirit can do whatever he wants, he’s God. However, since God is truth and I don’t believe the BoM is truth, I think option A is the least likely, nearly impossible, possibility.
I hope I’ve explained what I was trying to say more clearly.
 
Thank for your response Michael.

I not sure I understand your response though. If you have recieved the comforting presence of God then you know what it feels like. You seem sincere in your response in regards to this feeling so why would you question a person’s ability to recieve answers to prayer from God?

You state that you do not believe the BofM is the word of God and based on your assumption seem to be willing to discount communication from God regarding the matter. Our personal belief in something really is irrelevant to whether something is true or not.

Respectfully,
Steve Erickson

Respectfully,
Steve Erickson
I beg to disagree. Our feelings can definitely misguide us. Just because you feel a comforting sensation by reading the BofM doesn’t mean that that is from God. Someone can read the Koran and have the same feeling do you think that that is from God also? The truth is not base on one’s feelings. As mj said there is such a thing that is objective truth. And anything that is objectively true definitely is from God whether it be a mathemathical or theological truth. I wouldn’t question the feelings you got from reading the BofM but what we certainly question is your claim that it is from God.

The other thing that I wonder about is how could JS lead the people to believe that he can find treasures through glass looking. Check this website out. And this happened after he got his first vision. You would assume after seing God that he would turn away from sin and follow the gospel…
 
You are no burden at all. Sorry for the delay, but I do have other things to do! Can’t always reply immediately as you posts.

zerinus
No problem. My suggestion that i might be trying your patience was not prompted by the delay in your reply. It was just a personal concern of my own.

Please do not feel that you have to respond immediately to any question. A message board like this gives you and i the advantage of waiting to reply, so we may attend to more pressing obligations, or take the time to think and pray a matter over before making a thoughtful response.

👍
 
Yes, I reject the Book of Mormon on historical and scientific grounds. Not only that, but I found it to be an uninteresting read. I don’t think I ever read more than thirty pages, and it was a struggle to get that far. To go a step further, I reject it on spiritual grounds.
The missionaries will tell you to read the BoM and pray about it. If it is of God, the Holy spirit will testify of the truth. That was the only research I was encouraged to do to know my faith.
I’ve heard the same from Christians reading the Old Testament–once they get past the book of Genesis, it gets tedious. I was able to get through it more than once only because i had a great commentary by F.B. Meyer, that was written 100 years ago, that helped me glean some spiritual truths from each passage.

I think what helps is reading with a purpose. When i read the Quran, it was difficult reading because the quotes of the prophets were not put into any historical context. It was all what they said and extremely little of what they did.

What helped me get through the Quran was having Muslims off whom i could bounce my ideas and who were committed to answering my questions. I’d write my questions in the margin, bookmark the page, and go online to ask them what they thought. I don’t think i would have been able to read through the entire Quran without them.
 
No problem. My suggestion that i might be trying your patience was not prompted by the delay in your reply. It was just a personal concern of my own.

Please do not feel that you have to respond immediately to any question. A message board like this gives you and i the advantage of waiting to reply, so we may attend to more pressing obligations, or take the time to think and pray a matter over before making a thoughtful response.

👍
That is great! Continue with the good read, and keep the questions coming. I notice that another LDS poster has just joined the thread. I am sure he has some good thoughts to share with you as well, and you will have good responses from both of us.

zerinus
 
That is great! Continue with the good read, and keep the questions coming. I notice that another LDS poster has just joined the thread. I am sure he has some good thoughts to share with you as well, and you will have good responses from both of us.

zerinus
The missionaries are teaching me about the Book of Mormon. I’ve read that God cursed some of the people with a dark skin and these people became the Native Americans because they didn’t keep God’s commandments. Why would God do something like that? God doesn’t seem to do that today.
 
while there is certainly value in seeing firsthand the LDS method of preaching to investigators and also in socrates we see how intelligent people can out of curiosity get into mormonism… isn’t this better suited for it’s own thread rather than hijacking this one?
 
I’ve heard the same from Christians reading the Old Testament–once they get past the book of Genesis, it gets tedious. I was able to get through it more than once only because i had a great commentary by F.B. Meyer, that was written 100 years ago, that helped me glean some spiritual truths from each passage.

I think what helps is reading with a purpose. When i read the Quran, it was difficult reading because the quotes of the prophets were not put into any historical context. It was all what they said and extremely little of what they did.

What helped me get through the Quran was having Muslims off whom i could bounce my ideas and who were committed to answering my questions. I’d write my questions in the margin, bookmark the page, and go online to ask them what they thought. I don’t think i would have been able to read through the entire Quran without them.
I will tell you an interesting experience I have had with scripture reading. Before I gained my testimony of the Book of Mormon, I found scripture reading very difficult. I had tried picking up the Bible and attempting to read it, but never got very far. It seemed heavy, dull, and uninteresting. After I gained my spiritual witness of the Book of Mormon, there was a 180 degree change. Suddenly the Bible, and all scripture in fact, became unbelievably interesting. I couldn’t put them down, and have been reading them ever since. The Book of Mormon not only gave me a testimony of the Book of Mormon, but of all scripture, including the Bible. After that, I didn’t just know that the Book of Mormon is true; I knew that the Bible is true. And since then it has never lost its interest for me.

This is actually one of the stated purposes of the Book of Mormon. It is to convince us not only that the Book of Mormon is true; but that the Bible is true. The title page of the Book of Mormon states one purpose of the Book of Mormon is to “convince Jew and Gentile that JESUS is the CHRIST, the ETERNAL GOD, manifesting himself unto all nations”. And Nephi describes one of its purposes as being to convince us not only of the truth of the Book of Mormon, but of “my word which shall have already gone forth among them” (i.e. the Bible):

2 Nephi 3:

11 But a seer will I raise up out of the fruit of thy loins; and unto him will I give power to bring forth my word unto the seed of thy loins—and not to the bringing forth my word * only, saith the Lord, but to the convincing them of my word which shall have already gone forth among them* **.

I can tell you from personal experience that that is true. No one can really know that the Bible is true without the testimony of the Holy Ghost; and that testimony will not come to someone who rejects the Book of Mormon. The two go together. It is either both or nothing. To gain a testimony of the Book of Mormon is to gain a testimony of the Bible. You know when you have got it when suddenly the study of them becomes immensely interesting to you, and easy to read. That is one of the signs by which you can tell if you have received that spiritual testimony or not.

zerinus
 
I can tell you from personal experience that that is true. No one can really know that the Bible is true without the testimony of the Holy Ghost; and that testimony will not come to someone who rejects the Book of Mormon. The two go together. It is either both or nothing. To gain a testimony of the Book of Mormon is to gain a testimony of the Bible. You know when you have got it when suddenly the study of them becomes immensely interesting to you, and easy to read. That is one of the signs by which you can tell if you have received that spiritual testimony or not.

zerinus
For two thousand years people have found the truth of Christ in the Bible. So to say you have to have the BoM to find this truth is complete BS. It says more about YOU than it does about truth.

I can’t believe how seriously flawed your “logic” is. The very books in the New Testament testify of Christ. The Apostles did not have nor did they need Joseph Smith’s lies. And neither does anyone else!
 
while there is certainly value in seeing firsthand the LDS method of preaching to investigators and also in socrates we see how intelligent people can out of curiosity get into mormonism… isn’t this better suited for it’s own thread rather than hijacking this one?
Not at all. A thread is like a natural conversation. When people converse naturally, they talk about many different subjects, not just one subject. One thing leads naturally to another. It is awfully narrow-minded to suggest that once the thread has started, it must stick doggedly to the subject of the OP, and not talk about anything else.

This thread was started by BartBurk with a question about Joseph Smith quoting from the Book of Mormon. I gave him a reply to that question in post #2, which appears to have satisfied him, because he hasn’t come back to challenge it. Socrates came in at post #3 with his question, and the rest of the thread has since been about his particular interest about the Book of Mormon. We are not into post #330+, and the entire thread has been almost entirely about his interest. It is absurd to suggest that we should now start a new thread just because the OP said something different.

zerinus
 
For two thousand years people have found the truth of Christ in the Bible. So to say you have to have the BoM to find this truth is complete BS. It says more about YOU than it does about truth.

I can’t believe how seriously flawed your “logic” is. The very books in the New Testament testify of Christ. The Apostles did not have nor did they need Joseph Smith’s lies. And neither does anyone else!
Second that! The whole mormon system is BS. I am continually amazed that otherwise rational people could be so duped. They would avoid a con-man on the street like the plague, but they would invite two of them at a time into their homes. Go figure. Zerinus, you ought to be ashamed of yourself, trying to con people like that.
 
Second that! The whole mormon system is BS. I am continually amazed that otherwise rational people could be so duped. They would avoid a con-man on the street like the plague, but they would invite two of them at a time into their homes. Go figure. Zerinus, you ought to be ashamed of yourself, trying to con people like that.
I’ve been keeping up with this thread, and I have observed that Zerinus has been acting much more charitable in his posts than many of the Catholics.

Regardless of your feelings regarding the LDS Church, one can always ***respectfully ***disagree, and in a charitable manner.
 
I’ve been keeping up with this thread, and I have observed that Zerinus has been acting much more charitable in his posts than many of the Catholics.

Regardless of your feelings regarding the LDS Church, one can always ***respectfully ***disagree, and in a charitable manner.
You are truly deceived if you believe that mormons participate on this board for “charitable” reasons. Zerinus posts are full of mormon missionary proseltyzing methods. Those of us who have been in the mormon church recognize them for what they are, as we were taught ourselves how to “fellowship” people into the “Gospel”.

That last post was over the top “lying for the Lord”, a very acceptable practice among mormons and is anything but “charitable”.
 
I’ve been keeping up with this thread, and I have observed that Zerinus has been acting much more charitable in his posts than many of the Catholics.

Regardless of your feelings regarding the LDS Church, one can always ***respectfully ***disagree, and in a charitable manner.
Just telling it like it is, besides, zerinus is very thick-skinned.
 
while there is certainly value in seeing firsthand the LDS method of preaching to investigators and also in socrates we see how intelligent people can out of curiosity get into mormonism… isn’t this better suited for it’s own thread rather than hijacking this one?
Maj:

Perhaps you should ask Bart this quesiton. I doubt that he minds the route the conversation has taken, for after starting the discussion, he never posted a reply.
 
I’ve been keeping up with this thread, and I have observed that Zerinus has been acting much more charitable in his posts than many of the Catholics.

Regardless of your feelings regarding the LDS Church, one can always ***respectfully ***disagree, and in a charitable manner.
Thank you Wanner. I have learned to just ignore them. These folks are their own worst enemies. When their behavior embarrasses their own fellow Catholics, it is hardly doing their own cause any good. If they are not helping me, they are certainly not doing me any harm; so I don’t bother. Their behavior is in fact a sign of their desperation. They know they cannot prevail with sound argument; to they resort to these kinds of tactics.

zerinus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top