Did Russians interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections and is such interference acceptable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lynnvinc
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m beginning to think that Trump himself might be here at CAF under a pseudonym 🙂

I had earlier thought maybe a Russian agent, or someone in Trump’s inner circle, but now I think it might be Trump himself. 🙂
 
lynnvinc said:
I’m beginning to think that Trump himself might be here at CAF under a pseudonym 🙂

I had earlier thought maybe a Russian agent, or someone in Trump’s inner circle, but now I think it might be Trump himself. 🙂
Click to expand...
Nope. Trump has too big an ego to use a pseudonym. 😃
 
JonNC said:
Okay. What did they do that was worse than Obama’s threat of trade retribution against GB if they approved Brexit?
Click to expand...
Any threats that might have been made in this regard are open and out there for anyone to see and evaluate. Covert interference by Russia was not open. Indeed the source of the interference was deliberately concealed. I don’t know if that makes it “worse”, but it sure does make it “different”. The Brits who might have been affected by Obama’s expression of preference at least knew who it was who was expressing that preference.
 
sallybutler said:
  1. look up whatever site you are interested in sharing
  2. carefully write down the address on a piece of paper using a pen, pencil, or crayon
  3. double check that you have every character correctly written down in the right order
  4. sign back in to CAF and go to the forum you are interested in and would like others to gain knowledge from the site you just wrote down
  5. click post reply and type in an explanation of why you are sharing the site
  6. carefully type the address you wrote down. double check it
  7. submit reply
You now know how to share links from a phone
Click to expand...
How freakin condescending!!! Gee thanx!!!’
 
LeafByNiggle said:
Any threats that might have been made in this regard are open and out there for anyone to see and evaluate. Covert interference by Russia was not open. Indeed the source of the interference was deliberately concealed. I don’t know if that makes it “worse”, but it sure does make it “different”. The Brits who might have been affected by Obama’s expression of preference at least knew who it was who was expressing that preference.
Click to expand...
Didn’t answer my question. What did they do?
 
JonNC said:
Again, it is the law, they way the laws are written. It isn’t pretend. It isn’t public assistance. They paid for it , about 15% of their pay. They are entitled to have that money returned to them.
Are these constitutional? Of course not, but the money was confiscated nonetheless and those who were coerced to paid in deserve their money back.
Click to expand...
Nonetheless Congress has the power to repeal all Social Security and Medicare programs. Whether it’s deserved or not is another matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top