Did You Boycott Church? "Sunday w/o women"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eric_Olsen
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So women make up 80% of lay ministers!
Good riddance if a lot of them didn`t turn up. There are too many EMHCs, anyway. Why do so many people think they have the right to put their maulers all over the Blessed Sacrament?
 
Any woman who thinks there should be female priests doesn’t belong in Church anyway. So I say good riddance as well!
 
Any woman who thinks there should be female priests doesn’t belong in Church anyway. So I say good riddance as well!
If you ask me, they do belong in Church. The reason? So they can hear the word of God preached and hopefully change their minds.
 
May be Jennifer Sleeman should have stayed a presbyterian then she could have become a minister.
 
My sense of this is that the women who are most likely to be sympathetic to this nonsense are already not attending Mass. This would only give them a “stated reason” for not attending this week, vs. every other week.

In this piece, UK blogger Father Ray Blake notes that Irish Mass attendance increased slightly. He called it a boycott of the boycott.
 
Interesting timing. Sunday’s reading was Lazarus and the rich man—the story of someone who didn’t do the things he ought to have done, and ended up in hell as a result. 🤷
 
May be Jennifer Sleeman should have stayed a presbyterian then she could have become a minister.
I was raised presbyterian, and even as a child having a female minister made me very uncomfortable. I knew in my heart it was wrong, and she just couldn’t lead the congregation the same way a man could. There’s just some kind of fundamental difference between the sexes. 🤷
Having female priests would be a terrible idea. Knowing there are people skipping mass to protest not having them makes me want to go to mass all day!
 
See link.
I had no idea that this even was happening not that I would support it.

I went to my parish OF mass at 11:30 and it was still full.

creativeminorityreport.com/2010/09/did-you-boycott-church.html
Sure would eliminate a lot of the “chatter” before and after Mass! (just being sarcastic)
In truth, these women who put their progressive social concepts above the requirement to attend Mass on Sunday are only harming themselves; how foolish can someone be, jeopardizing their eternal salvation to make a moot point!
 
So women make up 80% of lay ministers!
Good riddance if a lot of them didn`t turn up. There are too many EMHCs, anyway. Why do so many people think they have the right to put their maulers all over the Blessed Sacrament?
80% sounds about right. However, your “good riddance” remark seems wrong. Be careful what you wish for.

I don’t agree that there are too many EMHC’s. I can’t imagine how most parishes could have three or more services on a Sunday morning (not unusual) if each service were extended for 15 minutes or more so that everyone can receive communion from the hands of a priest. I really don’t think that Jesus is offended by the touch of a faithful lay person’s finger more than the touch of a faithful lay person’s tongue. Moreover, many sick and homebound Catholics would not be able to receive communion without the ministry of EMHC’s, the majority of which are women.

I take it that your “good riddance” extends to women involved in other liturgical ministries (sacristans, lectors, musicians and choir, caring for the linens, greeters, etc.), catechetical ministry (DREs, classroom teachers, RCIA, sacramental preparation), leadership (Parish Council, etc.), fundraising, etc., etc. Without women, the Church just wouldn’t function.
 
I wonder how they feel about Pagan traditions that wont ordain males?
 
wow…just wow…send all those women our way. We’re not afraid of ovaries in the pulpit.👍
 
80% sounds about right. However, your “good riddance” remark seems wrong. Be careful what you wish for.
What i wish for is the destruction of radical feminism, along with all of its hell-conceived fruits.
Give Woman back her Womanhood, so that we men can love and respect her for what she really is!
I don’t agree that there are too many EMHC’s. I can’t imagine how most parishes could have three or more services on a Sunday morning (not unusual)*** if each service were extended for 15 minutes or more so that everyone can receive communion from the hands of a priest.*** I really don’t think that Jesus is offended by the touch of a faithful lay person’s finger more than the touch of a faithful lay person’s tongue. Moreover, many sick and homebound Catholics would not be able to receive communion without the ministry of EMHC’s, the majority of which are women.
How long has the Mass been referred to as a “service”?
The comment was that there are too many, not that they should all be banned. Anyway, so what if “each service” were extended for a few more minutes? Is everyone breaking his neck to get out to tee off, or to get the best spot at the football? Maybe little Crystal or little Shane has to be taken to netball!
Remember the First Commandment: “I am the Lord, thy God…”

Go to a Protestant service, and see how long it lasts! Or a TLM Solemn High Mass (one and a half hours). The Eastern Orthodox Mass apparently lasts 3 hours…Can anyone here confirm that?

What`s up with us apathetic Laodicean “Catholics”? 45 or 50 minutes!
I take it that your “good riddance” extends to women involved in other liturgical ministries (sacristans, lectors, musicians and choir, caring for the linens, greeters, etc.), catechetical ministry (DREs, classroom teachers, RCIA, sacramental preparation), leadership (Parish Council, etc.), fundraising, etc., etc. Without women, the Church just wouldn’t function.
Without the sort of women who`d boycott the Mass, the Church would be a hell of a lot better off, regardless of what other “liturgical ministries” they undertake.

They`re fallen souls, so of course we have to pray for their conversion.
 
wow…just wow…send all those women our way. We’re not afraid of ovaries in the pulpit.👍
Just one of the differences that make you Lutheran and us Catholic; another related difference is the interview/selection process and hiring of a Lutheran pastor rather than the Bishop assigning one.
 
I wonder how they feel about Pagan traditions that wont ordain males?
Good question, as a matter of fact.

I guess they would say “That’s different. Women are an Oprressed ‘Minority’, not Men.”:rolleyes:
 
I was raised presbyterian, and even as a child having a female minister made me very uncomfortable. I knew in my heart it was wrong, and she just couldn’t lead the congregation the same way a man could.
I don’t understand that at all. I remember when CofE started ordaining women, and they work about the same. I’ve been to communion services led by male deacons and laywomen, and they work about the same, too. I’ve been to protestant groups led by women and they’re perfectly able. What you’re describing is at odds with my experience and makes no sense to my reasoning. The only reason that I know against ordaining women to the priesthood is that the Church wasn’t authorized to confer that sacrament on women. That’s what the Church teaches, and because it’s sufficient, that’s the end of the matter. But I really don’t understand the notion that if the Church was authorized to do so, women would be in some way unable to function effectively.
40.png
SunnaB16:
So women make up 80% of lay ministers!
Good riddance if a lot of them didn`t turn up. There are too many EMHCs, anyway. Why do so many people think they have the right to put their maulers all over the Blessed Sacrament?
I take it that your “good riddance” extends to women involved in other liturgical ministries (sacristans, lectors, musicians and choir, caring for the linens, greeters, etc.), catechetical ministry (DREs, classroom teachers, RCIA, sacramental preparation), leadership (Parish Council, etc.), fundraising, etc., etc. Without women, the Church just wouldn’t function.
I take it that his “them” means the de facto protestants who organized the “protest.” Although that might encompass some women (as it also includes some men), it didn’t appear aimed at women generally, and that his “good riddance” extends accordingly. As we saw this Sunday, it would seem, most of the women involved in the ministries you describe are unimpressed with the protesting dissenters.
I don’t agree that there are too many EMHC’s.
That is a question that must necessarily be answered parish by parish, according to the metrics supplied in the GIRM, Ecclesiae de Mysterio and Redemptionis Sacramentum. How many EMHCs does your parish use? For a congregation of approximately how many? How long does communion take? Is the number of EMHCs conditional on the size of the congregation, or is it fair to say that a set number is habitually used? Those are the questions you would need to answer to determine if a given parish is overusing EMHCs, but anecdotally, for many parishes, the answer seems to be “yes.”
wow…just wow…send all those women our way. We’re not afraid of ovaries in the pulpit.
Me either. But that’s beside the point, unless you propose to crown yourself and your own proclivities as Pope.
Didn’t St. Paul state women are not supposed to teach the congregation? Oh…wait does that count anymore???
You tell me. That passage (1 Tim 2:11-12) also appears on its face to require that women “learn quietly with all submissiveness.” If you take the one at face value, you’ve got to take both. Do you? Or might that passage have more finesse than you’re attributing to it?
 
Good question, as a matter of fact.

I guess they would say “That’s different. Women are an Oprressed ‘Minority’, not Men.”:rolleyes:
Your probably right. Now that I think of it, I have brought this up on Pagan lists (and banned for it) but usually all I’d be told is that’s different. I’ve learned there is a current of female superiority in my faith I do find troubling but that is another thread.
 
Wow, what a brilliant new idea. Some Catholics not turning up to Mass on Sunday. Nobody’s ever thought of doing that before! :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top