S
Sixtus
Guest
The main difference is that Catholics eat more haggis. It is rumoured that Catholics invest heavily in the haggis-making industry but I do not have any statistics to substantiate it 
Sadly as a charamatic Catholic, I sometimes feel âhomelessâ because my pentecostal brothers and sisters think I am going to hell in handbasket with the whore of babylon and my Catholic bretheren think I am crazy and suseptible to group think and none of it is real. And some of my Charamatic Catholic brethren question my âcharasmaticnessâ when I dare to make sense of what they sometimes say or claim that seems to contradict Catholic teachings. Trying to get clarification is harder than pulling teeth sometimes.Loll I agree with you, my arguement fits so nicely as a round peg in a round hole. The problem is the Holy Spirit does take it upon Himself to âgo where He wantsâ and move others âhow He sees fitâ!
I guess we just have to be tolerant and respect diversty in worship!![]()
Sadly as a charamatic Catholic, I sometimes feel âhomelessâ because my pentecostal brothers and sisters think I am going to hell in handbasket with the whore of babylon and my Catholic bretheren think I am crazy and suseptible to group think and none of it is real. And some of my Charamatic Catholic brethren question my âcharasmaticnessâ when I dare to make sense of what they sometimes say or claim that seems to contradict Catholic teachings. Trying to get clarification is harder than pulling teeth sometimes.
**Hi MariaG
Being a Christian is never an easy path of everyone of us. The greatest challenge among pple relationship is not with the non-believers, but the believers instead. Becoz i too struggles with so much of misunderstanding and resentment with my church members. Is easy for me to forgive non believers , but it is difficult for me to forgive a believer, becoz i always ask myself. Why you behave such way, so talk nasty stuffâŚblarâŚblarâŚyou are a christian, how can you be like thatâŚ!!! But no matter what we are all learning and changing everyday and that is the trial that we all have to overcome.**
Some days, I truly just have to :crying:
Iâll never regret that the good Lord led me to the Catholic Church, but sometimes I am greatly saddened at the Christian fellowship I gave up. A whole culture really.
Talking to people who expect to see Godâs miracles and arenât afraid to witness to anyone about it. Converstations that are sprinkled liberally and honestly with âpraise Godâ, and âthe Lord told meâ.
**You mean there are those believers who expect to see Godâs miracles or are you refering to non believers expecting to see miracles?? **
But I have the Real Presence, and that is worth more than anything.
That is so true!originally posted by happygal
Hi MariaG
Being a Christian is never an easy path of everyone of us. The greatest challenge among pple relationship is not with the non-believers, but the believers instead. Becoz i too struggles with so much of misunderstanding and resentment with my church members. Is easy for me to forgive non believers , but it is difficult for me to forgive a believer, becoz i always ask myself. Why you behave such way, so talk nasty stuffâŚblarâŚblarâŚyou are a christian, how can you be like thatâŚ!!! But no matter what we are all learning and changing everyday and that is the trial that we all have to overcome.![]()
What I mean is sometimes the fundamentalist Christians tend to expect to see Godâs hand working in their everyday lives and love to talk about it. Catholic Christians tend not to talk in this manner, even if the expect to see it.originally posted by happygal
You mean there are those believers who expect to see Godâs miracles or are you refering to non believers expecting to see miracles??
"It is good to see that you are willing to make the concession that there is likely and angelic language. however, Paul is NOT speaking in hypothetical exaggerations. This was an intensely powerful experience for him that formed the basis of his ministry throughout life.
I think you need a little more time in the history books, Daniel. People did get doused and burned alive, as well as drawn and quartered, eaten by beasts in the coliseum, and man other gruesome ends. I have personally moved mountains with faith, so you cannot convince me that is hyperbole. Many people have given all they hae to feed the poor, also, and joined the church with nothing, not even the clothes on their back. He is not saying these things are of no value, or donât happen. He is saying that doing them apart from love is of little or no value. The same is true in speaking in the tongues of angels. If it is done with pride and self centeredness, and the person has not love, it is a noisy gong. This is the experience you have described in the Pentecostal gathering. The answer to your question in the title is that tongues not used in Love are not Catholic (even if they come out of the mouth of a Catholic). Because we are told to do all things in love.If that is the case then pour gasoline on yourself and light it or literally use faith to throw a mountain into the sea or ask to know all knowledge or all secrets. Yes, Paul is using the language of hypothetical exaggerations.
1 Corinthians 13
1 I may be able to speak the languages of men and even of angels, but if I do not have love, it will sound like noisy brass. 2 If I have the gift of speaking Godâs Word and if I understand all secrets, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I know all things and if I have the gift of faith so I can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 If I give everything I have to feed poor people and if I give my body to be burned, but do not have love, it will not help me.
![]()
The love that Paul is speaking of is a true expression of concern.If that is the case then pour gasoline on yourself and light it or literally use faith to throw a mountain into the sea or ask to know all knowledge or all secrets. Yes, Paul is using the language of hypothetical exaggerations.
1 Corinthians 13
1 I may be able to speak the languages of men and even of angels, but if I do not have love, it will sound like noisy brass. 2 If I have the gift of speaking Godâs Word and if I understand all secrets, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I know all things and if I have the gift of faith so I can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 If I give everything I have to feed poor people and if I give my body to be burned, but do not have love, it will not help me.
![]()
This is bragging and boasting about what I am doing in Godâs life, donât let the devil deceive you in this way as I learned very much how to boast and brag as a fundamentalist UPC.That is so true!
What I mean is sometimes the fundamentalist Christians tend to expect to see Godâs hand working in their everyday lives and love to talk about it. Catholic Christians tend not to talk in this manner, even if the expect to see it.
Your sister in Christ,
Maria
That was all BOGIS Maria, donât let it get to you, just a trick of the devil to make you feel guilty and when you can forgive yourself for this you will speak in tongues again, I pray for you now!Long thread, I actually did read it all.
These two caught my eye. And I wanted to offer a possible explanation beyond the âDo not test the Lord your Godâ one.
Sometimes there is not a valid interpretation because people who are given the gift, fail to speak up.
This happened to me, and I regret to this day, not speaking up. In a Assembly of God Church, which practiced tongue speaking, with one person speaking in tongues and waiting for someone to interpret.
As a fairly new person to the this particular church and the AoG tongue speaking kind of Church, I did not have the gift of tongues but had been praying that if God were to give me a gift, He would give me the gift of Interpretation as Paul says to do. Someone spoke in tongues. Someone started to interpret almost immediately. I shook my head no, because I KNEW the interpretation was wrong. I thought to myself, âNo, canât you hear? The Angels are singing for joy because someone has been healed!â
But I said nothing.
The pastor then got up after the interpretation, (wrong interpretation) and announced that a member of the congregation, whom I never heard of and did not know was sick, had been miraculously healed. She had a brain tumor. It had been resistant to all treatment. And then it was quite simply gone.
My interpretation would have been hugely edifying to the Church, but I was too scared, anxious, and did not step out and contradict someone who had been âinterpretingâ for years (I believe some pride had become involved here rather than true interpretation going on).
But I said nothing. I have never again been blessed by the gift of interpretation. If I ever pray for it again, I will also pray for courage and discernment to go along with it.
But as a Catholic Christian now, I am in agreement with this statement also.
God Bless,
Maria
That was all BOGIS Maria, donât let it get to you, just a trick of the devil to make you feel guilty and when you can forgive yourself for this you will speak in tongues again, I pray for you now!Long thread, I actually did read it all.
These two caught my eye. And I wanted to offer a possible explanation beyond the âDo not test the Lord your Godâ one.
Sometimes there is not a valid interpretation because people who are given the gift, fail to speak up.
This happened to me, and I regret to this day, not speaking up. In a Assembly of God Church, which practiced tongue speaking, with one person speaking in tongues and waiting for someone to interpret.
As a fairly new person to the this particular church and the AoG tongue speaking kind of Church, I did not have the gift of tongues but had been praying that if God were to give me a gift, He would give me the gift of Interpretation as Paul says to do. Someone spoke in tongues. Someone started to interpret almost immediately. I shook my head no, because I KNEW the interpretation was wrong. I thought to myself, âNo, canât you hear? The Angels are singing for joy because someone has been healed!â
But I said nothing.
The pastor then got up after the interpretation, (wrong interpretation) and announced that a member of the congregation, whom I never heard of and did not know was sick, had been miraculously healed. She had a brain tumor. It had been resistant to all treatment. And then it was quite simply gone.
My interpretation would have been hugely edifying to the Church, but I was too scared, anxious, and did not step out and contradict someone who had been âinterpretingâ for years (I believe some pride had become involved here rather than true interpretation going on).
But I said nothing. I have never again been blessed by the gift of interpretation. If I ever pray for it again, I will also pray for courage and discernment to go along with it.
But as a Catholic Christian now, I am in agreement with this statement also.
God Bless,
Maria
Maria, donât let the devil beat you over the head with this, I pray you forgive your self and your tongues restored!Long thread, I actually did read it all.
These two caught my eye. And I wanted to offer a possible explanation beyond the âDo not test the Lord your Godâ one.
Sometimes there is not a valid interpretation because people who are given the gift, fail to speak up.
This happened to me, and I regret to this day, not speaking up. In a Assembly of God Church, which practiced tongue speaking, with one person speaking in tongues and waiting for someone to interpret.
As a fairly new person to the this particular church and the AoG tongue speaking kind of Church, I did not have the gift of tongues but had been praying that if God were to give me a gift, He would give me the gift of Interpretation as Paul says to do. Someone spoke in tongues. Someone started to interpret almost immediately. I shook my head no, because I KNEW the interpretation was wrong. I thought to myself, âNo, canât you hear? The Angels are singing for joy because someone has been healed!â
But I said nothing.
The pastor then got up after the interpretation, (wrong interpretation) and announced that a member of the congregation, whom I never heard of and did not know was sick, had been miraculously healed. She had a brain tumor. It had been resistant to all treatment. And then it was quite simply gone.
My interpretation would have been hugely edifying to the Church, but I was too scared, anxious, and did not step out and contradict someone who had been âinterpretingâ for years (I believe some pride had become involved here rather than true interpretation going on).
But I said nothing. I have never again been blessed by the gift of interpretation. If I ever pray for it again, I will also pray for courage and discernment to go along with it.
But as a Catholic Christian now, I am in agreement with this statement also.
God Bless,
Maria
Yes as I just mentioned in the last thread to Maria, that a particular woman in a UPC church I attended now I realize that it was more than likely a cult after going through this and thinking about it. There are many more issues that led up to this church display. she always did the interpret and when some one else did it she faked a fainting spell and my MIL used to tell me this is famous for women. well LOL that irked me so I defended this of this women but learned it wa really a game going on butttttâŚlater learned this women had been a medium at one time you know telling fortunes etcc⌠so I am glad God got me an escape out of that church and you know if I admitted it right it never felt right but couldnât put my finger on it so stayed for awhile. I couldnât call it a demon because of loyalty like woman to woman but I still canât say it was a demon? I still see her come into the store and I think she ws just playing games? If you think games are demons then it would be a demon to you but I think the word exageration fits better. It saddens me to see if this happens in the RCC and that is why people are so strongly against the speakinfg in tongue thing I think.False tongues can be more than just faking too,
It can actually be a demon. I havenât seen mention of that at all in this thread.
The burning of christians did not occur until about ten years after Paul wrote I Cor 13 â under Nero, who burned the poor and prisoners to light his garden party. So, if christians were among the prisioners or poor they would have been burned too.I think you need a little more time in the history books, Daniel.
Respectfully, this is a cultural difference. The people that I know who love to talk about what God has done for them do so out of a sincere desire to praise Him and give Him the glory. Rarely do they do so out of boastful pride.This is bragging and boasting about what I am doing in Godâs life, donât let the devil deceive you in this way as I learned very much how to boast and brag as a fundamentalist UPC.
We all expect God to work in our life and as we are submitted to Him but should do this in quiet and not talk so much about it. Give praise and honor and thanks to God for all good things.
Dessert
âBe Jesus ⌠Share Jesusâ
Blessed Mother Teresa
That was all BOGIS Maria, donât let it get to you, just a trick of the devil to make you feel guilty and when you can forgive yourself for this you will speak in tongues again, I pray for you now!
Dessert
âBe Jesus âŚShare Jesusâ
Blessed Mother Teresa]
You misunderstood. I have since been given the gifts of tongues. However, I have never since been given the gift of interpretation.
But I sincerely thank you for you prayers![]()
Paul teaches that a proliferation of tongue-speaking in a church may actually be a sign of unbelief and Godâs ensuing judgment upon them. When Paul teaches the Corinthians about the proper use of tongues (1 Cor. 14:21), he quotes from Isaiah 28:11-12: âBy men of strange tongues and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people, and even then they will not listen to me, says the Lord.â Paulâs use of Isaiah is significant because he is referring to the apostate Jews of the 8th century right before they were destroyed by the Assyrians. To punish the Jews, God first allowed the Assyrians to speak in foreign tongues to them to confuse them before they were ultimately destroyed. Godâs judgment being revealed in the form of foreign tongues was first prophesied to Israel in the 15th century, B.C. (see Deut. 28:49-50). Remember also how God sent unintelligible tongues to punish His people for their lack of faith at the tower of Babel (Genesis 11).Will you explain more of that you stated about demons.
Orginionally posted by an anti-catholic:
Find out if that Spirit operating from within that person, is from God.
What this passage seems to be saying is - literally: Go up to a person about whom you have a question, and say something like the following:
Brother so-and-so, I am here because I want to make sure that we continue to walk in righteousness and truth, and I want to continue to make sure that all that we do is edifying to the Body of Christ, and as a result of the prompting of the Holy Spirit. So I have to ask the spirit within you a question:
In the name of Jesus Christ, I command the spirit that is within you to answer me, do you, the spirit that is Fill in the blanc : âspeaking in tonguesâ âprophecyingâ âprayingâ etc ] acknowledge and confess that Jesus Christ came in the flesh and is of God ?
If the spirit that initiates an action is either a) the person themselves or b) the Holy Spirit within them, then they will answer in the affirmative. If the spirit within them does not answer, or does not answer in the affirmative, or starts to make some other sounds, then you and others around you - may have some extra homework for the evening âŚor the week.
Ideally - what would be practiced in this context - would first have been preached on and addressed by the Pastor. And maybe he would have given a demonstration from the pulpit, so that people know what to expect, and so that they know that this is a Biblical teaching. Otherwise, people are going to think that you may know something that they donât. You may be asking someone a question, and others may surmise that you know something they donât about the person you are addressing. Next thing you know, people are grabbing him and getting ready to help you do some kind of exorcism - because you certainly must have known what you were doing, if you were going to initiate that kind of action in the midst of a meeting or Bible study.
And maybe that pastor would have given a demonstration from the pulpit, so that people know what to expect, and so that they know that this is a Biblical teaching. Otherwise, people are going to think that you may know something that they donât. You may be asking someone a question, and others may surmise that you know something they donât about the person you are addressing. Next thing you know, people are grabbing him and getting ready to help you do some kind of exorcism - because you certainly must have known what you were doing, if you were going to initiate that kind of action in the midst of a meeting or Bible study.
On the surface, the whole thing could have a semi-comical aspect to it. But to the person who is on the receiving end, it would not really be perceived that way. But with appropriate teaching and demonstration, it would sober up that individual church about what was going on in their situation(s) and meetings.
Certainly, John thought that Christian believers could be deceived (and still can) and that is why he and Peter took time to advise those congregations (and us) how to deal with those situations.
The Premise or idea that if a person is a Christian, that they cannot be deceived by demonic spirits, or that they cannot be deluded, that is NOT what the Bible says. The Bible is constantly warning Christians to be on guard about their own spiritual walk and their own situations because Christians CAN be deceived - yes EVEN Christians who are in a church, and YES - Even in a Church Context
If we are told (as an imperative command) to See whether they (the spirits in the situation) are of God or not, the presupposition is that some of them may not be, and Christians could be deceived by those spirits. This is why those evil spirits represent a danger, which is overcome by testing those spirits, before their messages are accepted as truth. If the WOF and others applied this test, they might have a much smaller following.
Testing the spirit in this manner would certainly make people more cautious about speaking out, wanting to ensure that the spirit inside them was the Holy Spirit. I wish that more people would do this. But this would require genuine caring by others towards the person at whom this was directed, as well as a loving attitude and ways to follow this up, in case it is found out that the spirit inside of them is Not the Holy Spirit. It would also require those who try it - to be willing to look bad or feel foolish perhaps, until they get use to it. As time passed, hopefully they would realize that other christians are following these guidelines for the spiritual safety and true spiritual wellbeing of Every Christian inside that Church.
This is a Biblical Teaching that where practiced - would lead to a church that would be much more Sober Minded and Concentrating on the REAL things of God, and not simply the latest trend or fad.
Good job Daniel! However, keep in mind that the condemned were burned for centuries before Christians became part of that group.alternativeperspective.blâŚuests.html
Bottom line Paul either wrote about branding with a hot iron or about burning at the stake ten to one hundred years before any christians were burned at the stake so to speak.
Forgive me if this has been repeated. I read half way though the thread and then scanned the rest.What is the difference between the Catholic speaking in tongues vs. Pentecostal speaking in tongues?