P
Peter_J
Guest
I always find it a little amusing how people who dislike the SSPX don’t say “They aren’t Catholics” but rather “I did not know they were Catholics”. But maybe that’s just me.SSPX, I did not know they were Catholics
I always find it a little amusing how people who dislike the SSPX don’t say “They aren’t Catholics” but rather “I did not know they were Catholics”. But maybe that’s just me.SSPX, I did not know they were Catholics
It seems that there has been a misunderstanding. I was actually asking how Eastern Catholics–“Orthodox in communion with Rome”–reconcile the immaculate conception with their theology.Try not to get too hung up on compass directions. What it comes down to is that Catholics believe that Mary was immaculately conceived, Eastern Orthodox believe that she wasn’t. I couldn’t say whether the other eastern churches, such as the Oriental Orthodox and the ACoE, do or not.
Thanks for the correction.Better be careful with that particular insult, Pfaffenhoffen. Remember that some Catholics are Byzantine too.
Boy, I apologize.See, you seem to be crossing the line of forcing, and stating an opinion.
You’ve been saying how similar we are, and now, when I’ve admitted as much, only stating that there are real differences, you treat it as though I’ve been saying we are completely different.
My position has been, this whole thread, that while we are similar, that doesn’t mean there aren’t issues and differences.
I find your stereotyping “byzantines” to be somewhat offensive.
I mean aren’t you Catholics always on about how different you are than Anglicans? Why the double standards?
Let me state my position: I Love EO, I find that sometimes they fight for little things (one awful example is what happens in the St Sepulchre Cathedral in Israel where everybody gets punching inside the Cathedral for petty reasons.
I asked to be married according to the Orthodox Rite of the Catholic Church but the permit did not come on time…
Before the battle you count the guns.I always find it a little amusing how people who dislike the SSPX don’t say “They aren’t Catholics” but rather “I did not know they were Catholics”. But maybe that’s just me.
It wasn’t a question exactly, I was pointing out that your statement “I asked to be married according to the Orthodox Rite of the Catholic Church” is nonsense, on 2 scores in fact. For one, Orthodoxy isn’t a Rite; and for another, Rome (and you and me) aren’t in full communion with Orthodoxy.If you make questions, I am glad to answer…
![]()
![]()
Sounds like you’re working on an allegorical novel. Good luck with that, but I’m not promising that I’ll buy a copy.Before the battle you count the guns.
The General is the Pope.
If you are with the Pope, you are Catholic, if you are not, you are not Catholic.
Sincerely I do not know whether the SSPX is with the Pope.
Maybe is not an answer.
Only Yes or No.
I do not understand “Constantinople People” I am Antiochian and the EP has no authority over our Jusirdiction. He is the “first among equals” as was the Bishop of Rome before the schism.Beautiful photo…
Totally wrong.
There is only one hurdle: the Pope.
All others were already in the Eastern Theology, including the Immaculate Conception, call it this way or the other.
We are hand-holding.
Please, do not be stubborn. You, the Constantinople People are famous for sticking to little points and do not move from there. Remember the iconoclasts. Thousands died for…nothing…
Remember: there is NOTHING between you and us.
I think one of the constants in life (whether in religion or any other realm) is that propaganda is easier than dialogue.Remember: there is NOTHING between you and us.
You are right.It wasn’t a question exactly, I was pointing out that your statement “I asked to be married according to the Orthodox Rite of the Catholic Church” is nonsense, on 2 scores in fact. For one, Orthodoxy isn’t a Rite; and for another, Rome (and you and me) aren’t in full communion with Orthodoxy.
(Were you basing “Orthodox Rite” off of the term “Anglican Use”?)
No problem. I will offer you one copy.Sounds like you’re working on an allegorical novel. Good luck with that, but I’m not promising that I’ll buy a copy.
The Pope was never the first among equals before the schism. Listen: if it was so, there would not be schism. There was schism for he had authority over the whole Church. And I tell you: the schism was done for the lack of patience of the papal envoy who behaved badly…I do not understand “Constantinople People” I am Antiochian and the EP has no authority over our Jusirdiction. He is the “first among equals” as was the Bishop of Rome before the schism.
also there is a large difference in emphasis between the two churches , Latins are more legalistic IMO and Orthodox put emphasis on Theosis(continual improvement sort of like the six sigma for the spiritual world). I know of what I speak as I was born and educated a Roman Catholic.
That argument is not very sound. Schism can (and still does) occur without a universal primate.The Pope was never the first among equals before the schism. Listen: if it was so, there would not be schism. There was schism for he had authority over the whole Church. And I tell you: the schism was done for the lack of patience of the papal envoy who behaved badly…
Talking about what we share in common won’t bring us into communion; resolving what divides us will. Again, I must wonder why is there such a strange double-standard when it comes to the Orthodox. Are you normally this enthusiastic about searching for what the Catholics and Lutherans or the Catholics and Calvinists share in common as you are with searching for what the Catholics and the Orthodox share in common? If not, why do you get upset with us for not showing the same enthusiasm for finding common ground with the Catholics?OK, see what I said: you look for the differences between East and West when what I emphasize is that what unites us is MUCH MORE than what divides us !!!
The fact that you have to pontificate that to them doesn’t seem like a very good sign.OK, see what I said: you look for the differences between East and West when what I emphasize is that what unites us is MUCH MORE than what divides us !!!
What problem are you referring to? Why does the fact that I don’t promise to buy your book indicate a “problem”?No problem. I will offer you one copy.
What is the problem?
So, your issue is with Authority.Some of the arguments are small, I agree, and we certainly do agree on considerably more than we disagree on, I agree. But there are real differences there. Additionally there is a fine line between asserting your opinion on something, and forcing it on others, you may mean to do the first, but it can come off as the second.
My only issue with the Immaculate Conception is that it is held dogmatically. I really don’t care whether or not people actually believe it, and I don’t think it contributes to salvation one way or another.
On a lighter note, I just finished doing some research for a major purchase I’ll be making soon, and as part of that research I was reading forums on the subject. It was quite nice to see people having fights that I have no dog in.![]()
I have a right to be upset for you not showing the same enthusiasm. Why? Because you much much closer to us than the Protestant, did not you realize that. The only, I repeat, the ONLY thing that divides us is the Pope !!That argument is not very sound. Schism can (and still does) occur without a universal primate.
Talking about what we share in common won’t bring us into communion; resolving what divides us will. Again, I must wonder why is there such a strange double-standard when it comes to the Orthodox. Are you normally this enthusiastic about searching for what the Catholics and Lutherans or the Catholics and Calvinists share in common as you are with searching for what the Catholics and the Orthodox share in common? If not, why do you get upset with us for not showing the same enthusiasm for finding common ground with the Catholics?
Do not look at negative sides, OK?The fact that you have to pontificate that to them doesn’t seem like a very good sign.