Differences of Opinion

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpiritMeadow
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
musing Now, I wasn’t raised Catholic…As far as CAF itself … I haven’t shared your experience, dear, although there’s a good chance we’ve been moving in entirely different threads. 😉 I haven’t seen this problem of a conservative faction pouncing on the more progressive ones for daring to think differently - although, to be as fair as I can, I’m pretty conservative (so my view might be skewed quite differently than yours!)… and being a newbie to both the religion and CAF itself, I’m more likely to be asking questions than expressing views.

I think, from what I’ve read (in CAF, and elsewhere) that in a lot of ways, the cradle Catholic actually has a rough go of it sometimes… having not chosen as an adult to be Catholic, after a lot of study and hard thought, leaves some of you ill-equipped to reconcile your faith with the modern world - or, specifically, the non-Catholic world. I read what a struggle it is, and it makes me sad - it really does sound tough. We adult converts have a much easier go of it, I think! :hug3: I’ve had the benefit of having an online friendship with a fiercely conservative (much more conservative than I am, I daresay) man that converted when he was in his 50s, who - and I’m so fortunate for this! - has given me extensive background in his thoughts on feminism and so forth (the issues you brought up), so … when I see what sound like rants against feminism and so forth on CAF, I immediately think of his explanations, and … well, they make sense.

I think the point I’m doing a rotten job of making is that I’ve had someone get through to me on WHAT it is that conservative Catholics are objecting to, so I might see a different definition of the source of the objection than you.

WORDS and their interpretation seem to matter more in Catholicism than the Protestant variety of Christianity - a term like ‘feminism’ (I keep returning to that because hey, I’m a girl grin) is loaded with a lot more symbolism and backstory!

I’m rambling - I shouldn’t post this late at night. I’m sorry.

I’m trying to say that I feel for you, and you come across as an intelligent person, and I DO hear (and understand!) your plea. :hug3: I haven’t had the same experience as you, but I do hope you find a way to continue to publicly make us all think about our beliefs, because any good belief bears close scrutiny, and it’s great when we have the chance to be prodded into thinking!Take care,
Deb
Very well said. 👍 There is danger in trying to label faith as we do politics. Faith is about truth as taught by the authorities of the church, understanding and comprehending the origins and constancy of that truth which is taught. Christ warned of ideas of this world polluting the truth and leading the faithful astray. To anyone who posts here and thinks it’s a “right wing conspiracy” that they’re up against, pleae examine your beliefs in the context of history. If your ideas have come about in the last 10, 20, 50 or even 200 years, are they really the truth? The truth has been pondered since Eden with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and what we have been taught, and what we have come to believe is the product of that process. Notice that we have changed our beliefs in conformity with the truth. We have submitted. This is the obedience that we are called to.

Those with radically different views are strongly encouraged to form a new church, seek a compatible church out, or examine their consciences as to the level of truth and adherance to the teachings of Christ that their views hold. God, truth and the Catholic Church cannot and will not change. We are suffering now for the exact reason that many have tried to insert their “truth” into the church, and the division and failure that resulted is in the news. We are called to unity as Christ is One, God is One and the Holy Spirit is One.

May Christ’s peace always be with you.
 
Spirit Meadow started this thread, and abandoned it. I wish I knew why.
 
Spirit Meadow started this thread, and abandoned it. I wish I knew why.
Seriously? I think she explained why, she felt people were piling on her and attacking. The entire point of her OP, which has not really been discussed here at all, was that differing viewpoints, and even a “loyal opposition” has a place in our Church, and always has. She’s around the forum and I’m sure would be happy to discuss that topic, if you are of a mind to.
 
Seriously? I think she explained why, she felt people were piling on her and attacking. The entire point of her OP, which has not really been discussed here at all, was that differing viewpoints, and even a “loyal opposition” has a place in our Church, and always has. She’s around the forum and I’m sure would be happy to discuss that topic, if you are of a mind to.
What exactly has she said other than she is a martyr?

I am so unsure what the point of this is, if she wants discussion but will not discuss.

🤷
 
Very well said. 👍 There is danger in trying to label faith as we do politics. Faith is about truth as taught by the authorities of the church, understanding and comprehending the origins and constancy of that truth which is taught. Christ warned of ideas of this world polluting the truth and leading the faithful astray. To anyone who posts here and thinks it’s a “right wing conspiracy” that they’re up against, pleae examine your beliefs in the context of history. If your ideas have come about in the last 10, 20, 50 or even 200 years, are they really the truth? The truth has been pondered since Eden with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and what we have been taught, and what we have come to believe is the product of that process. Notice that we have changed our beliefs in conformity with the truth. We have submitted. This is the obedience that we are called to.

Those with radically different views are strongly encouraged to form a new church, seek a compatible church out, or examine their consciences as to the level of truth and adherance to the teachings of Christ that their views hold. God, truth and the Catholic Church cannot and will not change. We are suffering now for the exact reason that many have tried to insert their “truth” into the church, and the division and failure that resulted is in the news. We are called to unity as Christ is One, God is One and the Holy Spirit is One.

May Christ’s peace always be with you.
Great post, one really that sums up much of this thread.
 
God speaks to our soul. In the Old Testament God’s promise of a redeemer. The New Testament is the story of the coming of the Redeemer and of the Chruch He founded to carry out His work. Pope Benedict XV sounds an ardent note of appeal: “Our one desire for all the Church’s children is that, being saturated with the Bible, they may arrive at the all-surpassing knowledge of Jesus Christ.” Such is truly the power of the Bible. In its pages the Prince of Peace reveals the law of grace that alone brings peace to the heart of man. Here, too, a loving Father speaks words that have power to illumine with the light of truth and to vitalize every spirit with the hope of peace and salvation.🙂
The God of the Old Testament is the God of the New Testament.

I agree.

What in the above do you think **anyone **would disagree with, unless I was wrong in my above take on your post…?

What is concealed in the Old is revealed in the New…

Nothing here that anyone would disagree with.
 
“Mature” and “contemporary” are radical buzzwords. This often seems to mean that you don’t want to start your own church, and you’d rather everyone else change theirs to suit your political beliefs. Of course, I’m sure that’s not the case here…
Not at all – hermeneutics is the science of translating meaning from one time and place to another. The Bible needs to be interpreted by each new generation and cultural context. The one church grows and develops through time.
 
Hi SpiritMeadow 🙂

SpiritMeadow, you stated in message 1, “I’ve been warned countless times not to read any number of things about liberation and feminist theology.”

It would be helpful to me to review the links on Catholic.com, prior to your posting here in message number 1, where you [SpiritMeadow] were **warned **not to read any number of things about liberation and feminist theology. And would you please be specific as to letting me know who the “YOU” is that you are referring to in your message number 1 instead stating, “I know most of you are conservative to very conservative.” 🙂 By the way, how can you know beforehand who is conservative unless you are suggesting that you only desire conservatives to participate in this discussion. How do you [SpiritMeadow] measure a ‘very’ conservative to that of a conservative? What’s your definition of a conservative? [msg. 59 ]
bumping for SpiritMeadow 🙂
 
Wildleafblower, it’s a book on Catholic theology as if our contemporary world view mattered. Looking at six doctrines in light of modern cosmology, evolutionary biology, and neuroscience.
Petrus
Are you the one Spirit Meadow mentions in her blog “Petrus”?
 
Wildleafblower, it’s a book on Catholic theology as if our contemporary world view mattered. Looking at six doctrines in light of modern cosmology, evolutionary biology, and neuroscience.
Petrus
Hummm. I spent a whole day not too long ago with the Sisters’ Adorers of the Blood of Christ. They are the female scholars for the Roman Catholic Church; a neuroscientist, a translator of ancient text, etc. Those whom I spoke with report directly to the Pope. A wonderful experience for me. We did discuss many things. One was Teilhard de Chardin, the census was he should be remembered strickly for only his scientific writings. 🙂 His theology wasn’t accepted by them.

Please don’t use anything I have written in your book. 🙂
 
Are you the one Spirit Meadow mentions in her blog “Petrus”?
Hi Hellisreal, I was informed by someone that she [SpiritMeadow] has made a mistake by calling him[Petrus-drpmjhess] a scientist in her blog ( I think he already corrected her) and recently was told there was mention on her blog of something to the effect that there were a lot of emails about someone calling the workplace where Petrus works? Myself, I stay away from blogs except for those whom I personally know.

(Sorry I had to edit this it didn’t appear correctly. I’ve never met SpiritMeadow or Petrus)
 
So many here claim they dont know each other.

Yet, the term HENCHMEN came from WHO?

also interesting is- WHO is not here now?

Where for art thou Spirit Meadow?

Why hide your light under a bushel basket?
Hi Hellisreal, I was informed by someone that she [SpiritMeadow] has made a mistake by calling him[Petrus-drpmjhess] a scientist in her blog ( I think he already corrected her) and recently was told there was mention on her blog of something to the effect that there were a lot of emails about someone calling the workplace where Petrus works? Myself, I stay away from blogs except for those whom I personally know.

(Sorry I had to edit this it didn’t appear correctly. I’ve never met SpiritMeadow or Petrus)
 
So many here claim they dont know each other.
Hellisreal, I don’t know what you are getting at but I honestly don’t personally know nor have I ever met SpiritMeadow or Petrus. That is the truth! Please don’t imply that I am a puppet here on Catholic.com. I’'m NOT! There is only me posting to the boards. My opinion is that you need to take a rest from the boards. 🙂 Hellisreal, your entire message 135 sounds very weird - your imagination is leading you astray. Take a rest. 🙂 Thank you.
 
Why are you pulling yourself into this?

I never mentioned you at all.

Read her blog.

You can read right?
Hellisreal, I don’t know what you are getting at but I honestly don’t personally know nor have I ever met SpiritMeadow or Petrus. That is the truth! Please don’t imply that I am a puppet here on Catholic.com. I’'m NOT! There is only me posting to the boards. My opinion is that you need to take a rest from the boards. 🙂 Hellisreal, your entire message 135 sounds very weird - your imagination is leading you astray. Take a rest. 🙂 Thank you.
 
Hellisreal, I don’t want to be pulled into this. Honest. Thanks for keeping me out of it. 🙂 As I said before, I only go to the blogs of people I personally know. I have my reasons. 🙂
 
One was Teilhard de Chardin, the census was he should be remembered strickly for only his scientific writings. 🙂 His theology wasn’t accepted by them. Please don’t use anything I have written in your book. 🙂
Thank you, wildleafblower – don’t worry – I won’t quote you! (I’m not a spy for any agency, ecclesiastical or otherwise).

I gave a paper at a Teilhard Society conference in Philadelphia two years ago – a most stimulating event. I found Teilhard’s theology much more engaging than his science, which is now out of date. I know he is not everyone’s cup of tea, but then neither is Augustine, Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas, Karl Rahner or any single theologian. One of the most brilliant papers of the conference was by Catholic theologian Jack Haught, on the theme “What if theologians took evolutionary suffering seriously?” It’s been published, I think in New Theology Review, 13:4 (2005)

Petrus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top