E
EasterJoy
Guest
You’re right, you don’t. Our Lord did not just stand there and let himself be beaten without admonishing someone who might have turned from their sin by his admonishment.…How long do you watch someone beat a dog with a stick before you take the stick away and say no more? I feel wrong for thinking this way and just needing to hear if it is a sin to just not take anymore…
The high priest questioned Jesus about his disciples and about his doctrine. Jesus answered him, “I have spoken publicly to the world. I have always taught in a synagogue or in the temple area 10 where all the Jews gather, and in secret I have said nothing. Why ask me? Ask those who heard me what I said to them. They know what I said.” When he had said this, one of the temple guards standing there struck Jesus and said, “Is this the way you answer the high priest?” Jesus answered him, “If I have spoken wrongly, testify to the wrong; but if I have spoken rightly, why do you strike me?” John 18:19-23
To give someone occasions to abuse you is to give them a near occasion of sin. If they cannot be around you without sinning against you, then stay away from them. Surely, though, even the Lord in his Passion called abuse what it was and ask that it stop.
*"If your brother sins (against you), go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have won over your brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, so that ‘every fact may be established on the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If he refuses to listen to them, tell the church. If he refuses to listen even to the church, then treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector. …Then Peter approaching asked him, “Lord, if my brother sins against me, how often must I forgive him? As many as seven times?” Jesus answered, “I say to you, not seven times but seventy-seven times.” * Matt 18:15-17, 21-22
Do you notice the difference? In the first case, the brother and then the church sought reconciliation with the brother who offended the other, but eventually the wronged party and the Church were both allowed to give up on a recalcitrant brother. Yet they were to forgive him essentially without end. Forgiveness and reconciliation are not the same thing! Forgiveness is letting go of ill will against the person. Reconciliation is re-building a relationship of trust. God is very forgiving when we sin, too, but reconciliation requires us to repent, accept the gift of forgiveness, and try to amend ourselves.
I think if you quit expecting yourself to put someone in a place of trust who you know will abuse it without compunction, you will be more able to let go of the ill will you feel. When there is an opportunity to object to or stop the offending behavior, then stop it! Only when you can neither stop the abuse nor object to it with any hope of reconciliation do you have to forgive and keep suffering the abuse. If you can remove yourself as a temptation to sin, by all means do it! Who knows, that may be what awakes them to what they are doing and turns them from their sin. That, in the end, is the goal, right?