That comment, besides being disrespectful, is untrue. It’s the second time I’ve seen you post a similar remark about His Beatitude and you owe a retraction as well as an apology to both him and my fellow Melkites.
I owe no such thing. The Melkite Patriarchs’ propensity to schism and heretical ecclesiology has ben well-documented on these forums, and, surprisngly, by Father Ambrose.
Until I see documentation to the contrary I stand by my remarks.
I don’t know where you’ve been attending Divine Liturgy, but I’d like to hear what it is that you think is missing.
I don’t quite know how to put my finger on it. I’ve yet to atted a Byzantine Catholic liturgy that wasn’t abridged, or that did not include Latinizations like holy water fonts, kneelers, stations of the cross, First Communion classes (for 7 year-olds), etc.
In most of the Byzantine parishes I’ve attended, the priests exhibits a sort of minimalism with the way he celebrates the liturgy.
But, as I’ve note, things are getting better. The Ukranian parish nearby is very authentic-looking (the liturgy is exactly the same as the one at the local Ukranian Orthodox Church) and the Byzantine-Ruthenian parish closest to me is getting better and better every year (my friend was just ordained a deacon there).
I haven’t been to the local Melkite one, but I’ve been told its extremely Latinized.
The Maronite and Syro-Malabar parishes are Latinized to the extreme, and don’t celebrate their liturgies with any sense of reverence or solemnity. Liturgy is facing the people, and it rather resembles a
Novus Ordo with but different words.