Divorce

  • Thread starter Thread starter muffindell
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you saying that the Canon law we are talking about tells us that the Catholic Church teaches us that the true follower of Christ will/can tell his adulterous wife, “Hey, you committed adultery against me. Therefore I will NEVER forgive you with a Christ-like forgiveness that is open to reconciliation upon your true repentance!”
Once again, its not as overly simplified as that. I don’t understand why you constantly take complex situations and reduce them to an absurdly simplified situation.
If you are, then when can the husband do this?
After his wife looks lustfully at another man? (For Jesus tells us this is adultery)
The canons don’t define adultery in that manner, so no.
After his wife has an emotional adulterous affair?
Possibly.
After his wife is seduced one night after drinking too much and commits adultery one time although she never intends to do it again?
After his wife is caught in a month long adulterous relationship? Year long?
Possibly.

Once again, there’s a million moving parts to each marital “equation” and it can’t be simplified to a mundane example.
 
First, we must acknowledge that this is a very, very rare thing to find… especially when biological mother and father are home.
  1. Its not as “rare” as it should be.
  2. It was merely an example of a situation where expression of contrition does not mean an individual is automatically fully re-incorporated into normal martial life.
Although… if the shepherds of the Catholic Church continue to refuse to defend marriage against divorce…
Untrue.
and the tribunals continue to hand out declarations of nullity like candy on Halloween then we will continue to have more and more stepparent households… which are more likely to fit your example…
I think most individuals who have been the gut wrenching process of an annulment would greatly disagree.
*A study by two Canadian professors of psychology found that when all the variables of class and maternal age are accounted for, “preschoolers in stepparent-natural parent homes . . . are estimated to be 40 times as likely to become abuse statistics as like-aged children living with two natural parents.”
…They put it this way: “Having a step-parent has turned out to be the most powerful epidemiological risk factor for severe child maltreatment yet discovered.” Indeed, they claim that the risk of child abuse and child murder is 100 times greater in a step-parent family than in a genetic family.*
What’s your point? :confused:
But, let’s take your example. Let’s say that Jack and Jill are validly married and it is discovered that Jack sexually molested their daughter one night after drinking too much.
Of course, Jill needs to get her and her daughter out of the home immediately. Does this sin separate what God joined? No. Jill is still Jack’s wife. Jill is still to love Jack as Christ loves the sinner who falls away from Him. I can’t imagine how difficult this would be. Jill couldn’t do it on her own. But, fortunately she wouldn’t have to… Christ will through her. For it is no longer Jill living, but Christ living through her.
Perhaps Jack would be truly repentant. If he is then I can’t imagine on him insisting that Jill take him back into the home. For he would understand the damage. His humility would likely be one sign of his true repentance. I can’t imagine Jill taking him back while any children are still living with her. I’m not saying it couldn’t happen but Jack would have to gradually earn that trust back baby step by baby step.
Jill’s heart, like Christ’s, is not concerned about herself. Rather, she is concerned for her daughter. For her daughter’s sake, not her own sake, she is keeping the repentant sinner away from the home.
So then you do recognize that sometimes its not as easy as “yes, I forgive you and you can move back in and everything is normal again…”???
 
Thank you. I will probably PM when I am further in the process. Right now I am focused on getting a job ( I have been a stay at home mom for 10 years) then I need to discuss my problems with my husband and get him to go to marriage counseling. I was told that marriage counseling will help us learn how to communicate during and after the divorce. That I need to prepare my husband for divorce or his reaction could be devastating for me and the kids. I am not good at confrontation and my husband ties me in knots when I try to talk so I have a lot of work to do.
I so know what being tied in knots feels like…have you thought about what type of job you want? I have been staying home too, and soon will be starting the same search…big changes … Will be praying for your situation…
 
Once again, its not as overly simplified as that. I don’t understand why you constantly take complex situations and reduce them to an absurdly simplified situation.

The canons don’t define adultery in that manner, so no.

Possibly.

Possibly.

Once again, there’s a million moving parts to each marital “equation” and it can’t be simplified to a mundane example.
Lots of times when people take complex situations and reduce them to a more simplified situation, it is because their emotional pain is so large that this is how they actually see things. For example, when a woman is raped, she oftentimes starts to experience all men as a danger, which of course not all of them are. When a child has a nasty mother, then sometimes that child sees all women as something quite horrible (which of course not all of us are:D)… When a person goes through a divorce, depending on possible trauma involved, once again things can look really simplified to some…such as All divorces seeming bad, or All divorces seeming fantastic, which of course is not the case…but it can take time and healing for a different understanding to take place. A very rational person can have this type of experience where everything seems a certain way. After my daughter was in a horrible car accident, all drivers seemed crazy to me! And I really was looking for those crazy drivers to prove how horrible all drivers are…though in this part of the country, drivers are horrible…😉 …and I am not necessarily rational!!! haha…
Bryan, this isn’t meant to minimize what your stance is…and it is quite possible your stance is purely from a different theological perspective than that of the Catholic Church, which of course is your right. And of course, I think all of us on this thread have our own slightly different perspectives which I suppose is how we compliment one another as the Body of Christ.
I think it is a good thing, though, that we continue to listen to one another and understand how our different perspectives help/harm us and keep our hearts open to learn from one another.
I am so hoping that Bryan will share with us his own situation so that we can understand him better and get to understand where he is coming from.
Blessings and Peace.
 
I so know what being tied in knots feels like…have you thought about what type of job you want? I have been staying home too, and soon will be starting the same search…big changes … Will be praying for your situation…
I have a bachelor degree in electrical engineering and about 15 years experience as a software engineer. I am applying for any job that my previous skills overlap. I just want an entry level job at a high tech or startup company so that I can get more current skills. Right now I don’t even care what the pay is. I just need a current job and to update my skills on my resume. I just started applying yesterday. There were 5 jobs that I could easy perform that I applied for. My states unemployment rate is low but it still takes a long time to find a job.

Thank you for your prayers 🙂
 
There are so many assumptions in here - the first being that parents are incapable of molesting their own children that I am not even touching it. Bryan I really implore you to sit down with a spiritual director and show him these threads. I say this out of great charity and love.
Good morning Joanofarc, I am sorry that you read the post that way. Certainly biological parents are “capable” of molesting children. It does on very, very rare occasion happen. The fact that there is “40 times” something in the one study and "100 times greater than” something in the other shows that there are certainly occasions of abuse in a household with biological parents. 40 times 0 or 100 times greater than 0 would mean that abuse also never happens in step-parent households! Sadly, abuse can happen in any family arrangement. It is just much less likely in a family where the biological parents are present.

Our charity must be grounded in Truth. Our Holy Father in his recent encyclical Caritas in Veritate shined his brilliant light on this, “Without Truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality.”

Many in the Catholic Church have allowed the handling of the divorced to “degenerate into sentimentality.” This is because they forget, or leave out, or simply don’t know, the Truth about divorce.

Divorce is a grave immoral offense (CCC 2384 and 2385). There are exceptions, however, when a civilly divorced person has not “contravened the moral law.” For example, the “innocent victim of a divorce decreed by civil law” has not “contravened the moral law”(CCC 2386). Also, if civil divorce remains the only possible way of ensuring certain legal rights, the care of the children, or the protection of inheritance” then it, “can be tolerated and does not constitute a moral offense.” The civilly divorced Catholic recognizes that the civil divorce has no power to separate what God joined and that they are to be faithful to their spouse. The civilly divorced Catholic recognizes that there is no “ex” spouse because of a civil divorce.

Yes, it is not truly charitable to tell all civilly divorced people that they may not partake of the Eucharist.

But it is also not truly charitable to tell all civilly divorced people that they *may *partake of the Eucharist “unless they marry outside the Church.”

For there are many divorced people who are guilty of the “grave immoral offense” of divorce and have subjected “innocent victims” to a “divorce decreed by civil law” preventing them from a conjugal relationship and often times forcing them to be without their children for much of the children’s lives. This is gravely sinful.

Leading these people to believe that they are not committing any grave sin only thickens the scales over their eyes preventing them from seeing the need to repent of the “grave immoral offense” and have a heart that is willing to right the wrong. It is the opposite of true charity. It is “false charity.” For it is void of the Truth.

Whether or not what you are saying is truly rooted in “great charity and love” depends on whether or not what you are saying is rooted in Truth.

Just as Hermas’ admonitions were…

And I said to him, “What if the woman put away should repent, and
wish to return to her husband: shall she not be taken back by her
husband?” And he said to me, "Assuredly. If the husband do not take
her back, he sins, and brings a great sin upon himself; for he ought
to take back the sinner who has repented…In this matter man and
woman are to be treated exactly in the same way. –The Shepherd 4:1-10


Are you saying that Hermas was wrong?

Bryan

LOVE SO AMAZING
 
Tough not to become a thread hack on this one…you guys are all hacks, you know that? Nothing could be nerdier than discussing doctrine/church teaching online with all the Catholic computer geeks. 😉 I love it.
What FCGeorge has brought up has touched a chord with me. I feel the same way as him. I think there have been way too many annulments on silly details. It’s created a lot of confusion. There’s no bones about it that St. Monica’s marriage was invalid. But that’s not the point. St. Monica was doing the best that she saw fit to do. She was seeking to please the Lord. This is what the Lord wants. He wants us to love Him and continue on His paths of truth in as much of the way we can understand. This is not about perfect interpretation of the law. The disciples were dummies. Nice! This is not to excuse their faults, or to excuse the teachings of the church, but if a person is seeking to please Christ, I believe they will be with Him. Ultimately, this is what it’s about.

Then I remember Moses telling his people that divorce was OK. I remember Jesus teaching that this was because our hearts are hard. Jesus went on to teach what the Church now upholds. Both Christ and Moses’s teachings are for our sake–not Christ’s sake. They are there because He loves us and wants the best for us.

St. Monica’s life inspired me. I saw her virtue, and I continued to set her life as an example for me. I love her and talk to her often. Her husband was a public official like mine. He suffered from angry outbursts, like mine. And he had a “sexual addiction” if you will, like mine. I even visited her chapel at the Vatican, wondering where her image was. I took a seat, prayed the devotionals, looked up, and then saw her overpowering, larger-than-life statue. But shockingly, her compassionate gaze, etched in stone, was fixed directly at me. From then on I knew she was intercessing in heaven for my family. Like crazy. ha ha.

I would often struggle about leaving my husband. I was confused. I looked at Monica’s life, and wondered what I should do. I faced my hub’s violence and sexual betrayals over and over. I sought to be gentle and compassionate with him. And I did, and it helped. We went to marriage counselors, and he would get better for a while. I stayed for 11 years. But one day, I decided to leave because of the escalation in violence, the fear my children had, and for our safety. Unfortunately my husband still refuses to commit to impulse control counseling. :(( No one knows St. Monica’s exact situation. It’s not good to assume. I don’t see her as having the opportunity to leave, since things were different, socioeconomically, especially for women. I don’t know how violent her husband was, bless her. Perhaps God put her there to suffer for the sake of 3 conversions. Should someone throw their body into a rosebush because St. Francis passionately did so? 🙂 I strongly feel what I did was right, though. There has been no indication otherwise, even when seeking the counsel of many different conservative priests. I was seeking to do Christ’s will and please Him. How can we lump every incident under the law with complete objectivity? It requires discernment, faith, reason, love. Many would say I should have left my husband at first sign of abuse. I am glad I did not, even to this day. Many would say I should not have brought 6 children into such an unhealthy situation. I’ve come to understand that God is much more powerful than I am. And because of Him in His goodness and mercy, my children are very strong, mature and devout for other children their age. They have a deepness that I wish I had before getting married.
 
Are you saying that the Canon law we are talking about tells us that the Catholic Church teaches us that the true follower of Christ will/can tell his adulterous wife, “Hey, you committed adultery against me. Therefore I will NEVER forgive you with a Christ-like forgiveness that is open to reconciliation upon your true repentance!”
Once again, its not as overly simplified as that. I don’t understand why you constantly take complex situations and reduce them to an absurdly simplified situation.

Hello Father, hope you are well. Because for the follower of Christ everything is as simple as following Christ’s example. It only gets complicated when we look for “outs” from this. His example of forgiving the sinner who is truly repentant of even the most sustained and horrid adultery against Him will be imitated by His followers. And it will be taught by His shepherds. Hermas taught this specifically in relation to adultery. But back then, I suppose, it didn’t seem like as big of deal. For Christians back then were getting fed to wild beasts and burned in piles of wood. The “hurt” caused by taking back a repentant adulterous spouse probably didn’t seem all that bad compared to the hurt caused by the claws and teeth of a lion… especially first watching your children be fed to the beasts.

Now, we sit in our cushy office chairs and type on our computers about how “unrealistic” it is to expect such a “heroic” deed as forgiving a repentant adulterous spouse with Christ-like forgiveness that is open to reconciliation upon true repentance.

Matthew 5:28
But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.
The canons don’t define adultery in that manner, so no.
I think the Church is avoiding being Pharisaic (Mt 23:4).
Father, I realize that each situation is different and that there may be “a million moving parts to each marital ‘equation.’” There could be 10 million moving parts and it would not change the Truth that I will be forgiven as I forgive others.

If you object to my “mundane examples” then please provide one with as many moving parts as you want that gets down to, "This wife (in this described situation) may forever close her heart to a Christ-like forgiveness that is open to reconciliation upon her husbands true repentance. In this case (described situation here) even if the husband truly repents, the wife can choose a “forgiveness” that is not open to reconcilation. She may choose a “forgiveness” that is only concerned with her “feeling better” and is not concerned with welcoming the prodigal spouse back into a relationship.

Then, we could examine how this is Christ-like… how Christ would also do this to you or me.

Bryan

LOVE SO AMAZING
 
But, let’s take your example. Let’s say that Jack and Jill are validly married and it is discovered that Jack sexually molested their daughter one night after drinking too much.
Of course, Jill needs to get her and her daughter out of the home immediately. Does this sin separate what God joined? No. Jill is still Jack’s wife. Jill is still to love Jack as Christ loves the sinner who falls away from Him. I can’t imagine how difficult this would be. Jill couldn’t do it on her own. But, fortunately she wouldn’t have to… Christ will through her. For it is no longer Jill living, but Christ living through her.
Perhaps Jack would be truly repentant. If he is then I can’t imagine on him insisting that Jill take him back into the home. For he would understand the damage. His humility would likely be one sign of his true repentance. I can’t imagine Jill taking him back while any children are still living with her. I’m not saying it couldn’t happen but Jack would have to gradually earn that trust back baby step by baby step.
Jill’s heart, like Christ’s, is not concerned about herself. Rather, she is concerned for her daughter. For her daughter’s sake, not her own sake, she is keeping the repentant sinner away from the home.
So then you do recognize that sometimes its not as easy as “yes, I forgive you and you can move back in and everything is normal again…”???

Hello again Father, I should have read this post before responding to your previous post. Yes. I hope it hasn’t come across any other way. I will try to be more careful. I am assuming that you have not had a spouse commit adultery and abandon you. Forgiveness of this is definitely not “easy.” But the awesome news is that we are not left to our own strength! If we keep His commands (one of those being “what God hath joined let no man put asunder”) then He promises us that we “abide in Him” and He therefore “abides in us.”
Although… if the shepherds of the Catholic Church continue to refuse to defend marriage against divorce…

Father, I pray you are correct. Will you please point me to an example of a modern American bishop defending marriage against divorce? Of a modern American bishop plainly stating what Hermas plainly stated?
What’s your point?
The point was just to supply another reason as to why it is important for the shepherds of the Catholic Church (and lay people) to defend marriage against divorce and to grant declarations of nullity in only those situations when it is proven beyond any doubt that two people were really not validly married. The more divorces that occur and the more declarations of nullity that are handed out, the more “blended families” we have and the more child abuse we have.

It ultimately, however, boils down to the salvation of souls being the real reason for the shepherds to do this.

Bryan

LOVE SO AMAZING
 
I would often struggle about leaving my husband. I was confused. I looked at Monica’s life, and wondered what I should do. I faced my hub’s violence and sexual betrayals over and over. I sought to be gentle and compassionate with him. And I did, and it helped. We went to marriage counselors, and he would get better for a while. I stayed for 11 years. But one day, I decided to leave because of the escalation in violence, the fear my children had, and for our safety. Unfortunately my husband still refuses to commit to impulse control counseling.
I do not know Faithsmind’s heart but this truly seems like that of a Christ-like heart. It is a heart that, out of love of the other (the spouse and and children) chose to leave. It appears to be a heart that is open to reconciliation upon her husband’s true repentance… just as Christ was for her (assuming she once needed that, as St. Monica did; ). God bless her, she hasn’t even referred to him as an “ex” husband! And, I imagine that even if a civil divorce hasn’t happened, but does need to happen as the only way to protect her and the children, then her *heart *will not believe to be her “ex” husband.

You and your entire family (how blessed you are to have 6 children!) will have a special place in my prayers. You may not need it but an awesome resource is The Gift of Self thegiftofself.org/

I do not know what a “thread hack” is but I hope it is okay to be discussing this topic on this thread. If there is a better place then I hope a moderator instructs me. But I don’t mind being called nerdy! And I cannot think of a better topic to be discussing than Christ’s teachings… the teachings of His Church!

Bryan

LOVE SO AMAZING
 
Hello again Father, I should have read this post before responding to your previous post. Yes. I hope it hasn’t come across any other way. I will try to be more careful. I am assuming that you have not had a spouse commit adultery and abandon you. Forgiveness of this is definitely not “easy.” But the awesome news is that we are not left to our own strength! If we keep His commands (one of those being “what God hath joined let no man put asunder”) then He promises us that we “abide in Him” and He therefore “abides in us.”

Father, I pray you are correct. Will you please point me to an example of a modern American bishop defending marriage against divorce? Of a modern American bishop plainly stating what Hermas plainly stated?

The point was just to supply another reason as to why it is important for the shepherds of the Catholic Church (and lay people) to defend marriage against divorce and to grant declarations of nullity in only those situations when it is proven beyond any doubt that two people were really not validly married. The more divorces that occur and the more declarations of nullity that are handed out, the more “blended families” we have and the more child abuse we have.

It ultimately, however, boils down to the salvation of souls being the real reason for the shepherds to do this.

Bryan

LOVE SO AMAZING
Bryan,
Actually, some priests have been married , divorced, and have received annulments. And those who haven’t dedicate their entire lives to serving our Lord by nurturing the laity, by hearing endless recounts of life stories and recounts of true life experiences from many , many people. The wisdom they have acrued after living such a life is an amazing thing. I thank God for priests and the wisdom , blessings, and direction they offer us.
You site percentiles of child abuse. I claim in retort that any and every child’s life is sacred and holy. It doesn’t matter what percentile they do or don’t fit into. Perhaps some children come out of abusive environments alive and strong, but many don’t. Many that physically come out of violent homes alive are crippled emotionally for life. They often have a sense of fearfulness that never leaves. They often have post traumatic stress symptoms that diminish their capacity to ever love and trust. If a parent finds that a partner is violent, it is their responsibility to determine the odds of whether after a divorce their child will be in their custody or not, and to work as hard as they can to insure that their child/children are never again exposed to violence in their living environment. A house with violence is not a home. A “marriage” with violence is a mockery of what a true marriage is meant to be, whether null or valid. Mature adults do not use children to satisfy their own needs to feel "holy’ or “in God’s good graces”. Mature adults protect children from violence and do not subject their children to a fearful environment to the very best of their ability. Every child, unborn OR BORN has the right to a safe environment. The Catholic faith is a proponent for LIFE, not terrorism. Many women/men safely rescue their children from abusive environments and also remarry in a healthier environment to truly holy men/women who would never wish harm on an innocent child. Violence is a very real, and very dangerous thing. It sounds all wonderful and fuzzy to think about reuniting with a partner who has a past hx of violence…until you see them murder your baby. And then what would Monica say?
 
Tough not to become a thread hack on this one…you guys are all hacks, you know that? Nothing could be nerdier than discussing doctrine/church teaching online with all the Catholic computer geeks. 😉 I love it.
What FCGeorge has brought up has touched a chord with me. I feel the same way as him. I think there have been way too many annulments on silly details. It’s created a lot of confusion. There’s no bones about it that St. Monica’s marriage was invalid. But that’s not the point. St. Monica was doing the best that she saw fit to do. She was seeking to please the Lord. This is what the Lord wants. He wants us to love Him and continue on His paths of truth in as much of the way we can understand. This is not about perfect interpretation of the law. The disciples were dummies. Nice! This is not to excuse their faults, or to excuse the teachings of the church, but if a person is seeking to please Christ, I believe they will be with Him. Ultimately, this is what it’s about.

Then I remember Moses telling his people that divorce was OK. I remember Jesus teaching that this was because our hearts are hard. Jesus went on to teach what the Church now upholds. Both Christ and Moses’s teachings are for our sake–not Christ’s sake. They are there because He loves us and wants the best for us.

St. Monica’s life inspired me. I saw her virtue, and I continued to set her life as an example for me. I love her and talk to her often. Her husband was a public official like mine. He suffered from angry outbursts, like mine. And he had a “sexual addiction” if you will, like mine. I even visited her chapel at the Vatican, wondering where her image was. I took a seat, prayed the devotionals, looked up, and then saw her overpowering, larger-than-life statue. But shockingly, her compassionate gaze, etched in stone, was fixed directly at me. From then on I knew she was intercessing in heaven for my family. Like crazy. ha ha.

I would often struggle about leaving my husband. I was confused. I looked at Monica’s life, and wondered what I should do. I faced my hub’s violence and sexual betrayals over and over. I sought to be gentle and compassionate with him. And I did, and it helped. We went to marriage counselors, and he would get better for a while. I stayed for 11 years. But one day, I decided to leave because of the escalation in violence, the fear my children had, and for our safety. Unfortunately my husband still refuses to commit to impulse control counseling. :(( No one knows St. Monica’s exact situation. It’s not good to assume. I don’t see her as having the opportunity to leave, since things were different, socioeconomically, especially for women. I don’t know how violent her husband was, bless her. Perhaps God put her there to suffer for the sake of 3 conversions. Should someone throw their body into a rosebush because St. Francis passionately did so? 🙂 I strongly feel what I did was right, though. There has been no indication otherwise, even when seeking the counsel of many different conservative priests. I was seeking to do Christ’s will and please Him. How can we lump every incident under the law with complete objectivity? It requires discernment, faith, reason, love. Many would say I should have left my husband at first sign of abuse. I am glad I did not, even to this day. Many would say I should not have brought 6 children into such an unhealthy situation. I’ve come to understand that God is much more powerful than I am. And because of Him in His goodness and mercy, my children are very strong, mature and devout for other children their age. They have a deepness that I wish I had before getting married.
I applaud you for getting your children out of a violent situation. I can only imagine the pain you have suffered and what strength it took for you to leave such a debilitating situation for the sake of your children. Please continue to seek spiritual direction of a priest or nun or a therapist skilled in child abuse if your children have unsupervised visitation with your ex. May God bless and keep all of you safe…
 
Switching gears here for a second…
Thinking over the past 700plus posts, I know that we have seen many different opinions of the divorce/ annulment process…some posters adhere totally to the Churches teachings, some posters believe that the annulment process is too difficult and not user-friendly, and some posters believe the annulment process is way too lenient and not biblical. And I am sure many readers are somewhere in the middle of these classifications.
What I am seeing though, despite the differences in opinions, is that the large majority of posters have experienced profound suffering due to the issue of divorce/annulement. We are told by our Faith that God brings goodness out of suffering, and as Catholics, we are taught early on how to “offer up” our suffering for the goodness of others…
So, I am curious, do you posters offer up your suffering? What do you offer it up for? When did you start offering it up? What goodness do you hope God brings out of your suffering? Do you see your children learning how to offer up their own pain to help the world? Do you combine your suffering to the suffering of our Lord? Do you have any special ways of thinking about your suffering? Has suffering in some ways enriched your own life?
Thanks and God bless!
 
I have a bachelor degree in electrical engineering and about 15 years experience as a software engineer. I am applying for any job that my previous skills overlap. I just want an entry level job at a high tech or startup company so that I can get more current skills. Right now I don’t even care what the pay is. I just need a current job and to update my skills on my resume. I just started applying yesterday. There were 5 jobs that I could easy perform that I applied for. My states unemployment rate is low but it still takes a long time to find a job.

Thank you for your prayers 🙂
That is great that you are so well educated!!! Jobs sure are hard to find…am praying for you!
 
Because for the follower of Christ everything is as simple as following Christ’s example.
Indeed, but there’s a reason that Christ told us to be as innocent as doves but also wise as foxes.
It only gets complicated when we look for “outs” from this.
I disagree. I think it gets complicated when we seek to be responsible. People can look for “outs” by making things complicated or overly simple, they’re simply looking for what gives them the out. Jesus told us to love our neighbor as ourselves. Thus we need to love ourselves. People who love and understand themselves as children of God sometimes need to draw lines in the sand in order demand that respect from others.
His example of forgiving the sinner who is truly repentant of even the most sustained and horrid adultery against Him will be imitated by His followers.
But God also knows and sees the heart, we cannot do so. If someone doesn’t believe another has changed or is capable of change, we’re left with a difficult situation.
Matthew 5:28
But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.
We’re talking apples and oranges here. I was referring to what canon law was addressing thus we need to define the terms as they are used in canon law.
Father, I realize that each situation is different and that there may be “a million moving parts to each marital ‘equation.’” There could be 10 million moving parts and it would not change the Truth that I will be forgiven as I forgive others.
And it doesn’t change the fact that forgiveness is a process that is struggled with by fragile human persons. Grace builds on nature, it doesn’t override it.
If you object to my “mundane examples” then please provide one with as many moving parts as you want that gets down to…
The issue is that it can’t be simplified to a forum post. Annulment cases when typed out are essentially small books, that’s how complicated it gets.
 
Hello again Father, I should have read this post before responding to your previous post. Yes. I hope it hasn’t come across any other way. I will try to be more careful. I am assuming that you have not had a spouse commit adultery and abandon you. Forgiveness of this is definitely not “easy.” But the awesome news is that we are not left to our own strength! If we keep His commands (one of those being “what God hath joined let no man put asunder”) then He promises us that we “abide in Him” and He therefore “abides in us.”
Right, but someone who sexually molested a child is never going to be allowed to be alone with their own children. Anything else isn’t forgiveness its foolishness and dangerous.
Someone who suffers from a personality disorder is most likely never going to be capable of being in a relationship with another person. To pretend otherwise is blindness.
Someone who is abusive and controlling could very well be using the reconciliation process as a means of control.
Father, I pray you are correct. Will you please point me to an example of a modern American bishop defending marriage against divorce? Of a modern American bishop plainly stating what Hermas plainly stated?
Google search, you’ll find 'em.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top