S
Santos
Guest
For the Catholic, the Gospel or “Good News” comes from “Magisterial Teaching”, which is derived from Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture.
For the Protestant, the Gospel or “Good News” comes from the bible alone, “Sola Scriptura”.
In addition, the four canonical Gospels (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John) present to us our Lord’s life, works, teachings and resurrection… and although the written words of the gospels are the same, the interpretations are different, resulting in Christ’s teachings to be understood differently between Catholics and Protestants.
Let me give an example of “Magisterial Teaching”, which is derived from Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture VS. the bible alone, “Sola Scriptura”.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN on the EUCHARIST (JN 6)
“I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.” The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.” -Jn 6:51-55, -this is not the language of symbolism.
Magisterial Teaching tells us that this is The Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist; the body, blood, soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, Truly present in the Blessed Sacrament. This faith comes from Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture.
Sacred Tradition gives us St. Ignatius of Antioch, a disciple of John the Apostle, who wrote (110 AD) concerning heretics: “They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the Flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, Flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in His goodness, raised up again.”
When it comes to THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN on the EUCHARIST (JN 6)
A Protestant believes that Christ is only present symbolically in the Eucharist as he puts his faith in the bible alone “Sola Scriptura” where he gets his own understanding, he got his teaching from self-interpretation.
A Catholic believes in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist as he puts his faith in “Sacred Scripture” and “Sacred Tradition” where he gets St. Ignatius who got his teaching directly from the mouth of John himself.
Logically, we cannot be 100% certain of Christ’s teachings if we separate “Sacred Tradition” from “Sacred Scripture”. Sacred Tradition came before Sacred Scripture. Like a tree that bares good fruit. It is the tree that is the Church and the fruit; Sacred Scripture. You cannot declare the fruit good if indeed the tree is bad. The bible was not intended to be used for self-interpretations, the Truth already was, is and forever shall be! It is not by our own understanding that we receive Truth, it is by faith in that which has already been revealed “divine revelation” that we receive Truth. If we understood it all, then it would no longer be faith that we have.
“As you sent me into the world, so I sent them into the world. And I consecrate myself for them, so that they also may be consecrated in truth. I pray not only for them, but also for those who will believe in me through their word.” -Jn 17:18-20
Christ prays that we may be consecrated in truth “not” through his word alone “Sola Scriptura”, but rather through their word, “Sacred Tradition”. When we eliminate Sacred Tradition, we eliminate the means in which Christ prays, “that we may be consecrated in Truth.”
Looking at the two differences in the way Catholics and Protestants come to know the Gospel, and knowing that Christ’s teachings are understood differently between Catholics and Protestants, I began to wonder Do Catholics and Protestants believe in the same Gospel?
For the Protestant, the Gospel or “Good News” comes from the bible alone, “Sola Scriptura”.
In addition, the four canonical Gospels (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John) present to us our Lord’s life, works, teachings and resurrection… and although the written words of the gospels are the same, the interpretations are different, resulting in Christ’s teachings to be understood differently between Catholics and Protestants.
Let me give an example of “Magisterial Teaching”, which is derived from Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture VS. the bible alone, “Sola Scriptura”.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN on the EUCHARIST (JN 6)
“I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.” The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.” -Jn 6:51-55, -this is not the language of symbolism.
Magisterial Teaching tells us that this is The Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist; the body, blood, soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, Truly present in the Blessed Sacrament. This faith comes from Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture.
Sacred Tradition gives us St. Ignatius of Antioch, a disciple of John the Apostle, who wrote (110 AD) concerning heretics: “They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the Flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, Flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in His goodness, raised up again.”
When it comes to THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN on the EUCHARIST (JN 6)
A Protestant believes that Christ is only present symbolically in the Eucharist as he puts his faith in the bible alone “Sola Scriptura” where he gets his own understanding, he got his teaching from self-interpretation.
A Catholic believes in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist as he puts his faith in “Sacred Scripture” and “Sacred Tradition” where he gets St. Ignatius who got his teaching directly from the mouth of John himself.
Logically, we cannot be 100% certain of Christ’s teachings if we separate “Sacred Tradition” from “Sacred Scripture”. Sacred Tradition came before Sacred Scripture. Like a tree that bares good fruit. It is the tree that is the Church and the fruit; Sacred Scripture. You cannot declare the fruit good if indeed the tree is bad. The bible was not intended to be used for self-interpretations, the Truth already was, is and forever shall be! It is not by our own understanding that we receive Truth, it is by faith in that which has already been revealed “divine revelation” that we receive Truth. If we understood it all, then it would no longer be faith that we have.
“As you sent me into the world, so I sent them into the world. And I consecrate myself for them, so that they also may be consecrated in truth. I pray not only for them, but also for those who will believe in me through their word.” -Jn 17:18-20
Christ prays that we may be consecrated in truth “not” through his word alone “Sola Scriptura”, but rather through their word, “Sacred Tradition”. When we eliminate Sacred Tradition, we eliminate the means in which Christ prays, “that we may be consecrated in Truth.”
Looking at the two differences in the way Catholics and Protestants come to know the Gospel, and knowing that Christ’s teachings are understood differently between Catholics and Protestants, I began to wonder Do Catholics and Protestants believe in the same Gospel?