Do Catholics have the same unity with Muslims as they do with Protestants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christian_Unity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
. Any religion that denies that Christ came in the flesh is false, by definition.
Islam does not deny that Christ came in the flesh. To the contrary, the Qur’an affirms it in at least nine places. Here is one:

[3:46] "When the angels said, 'O Mary, God gives thee glad tidings of a son through a Word from Him; his name shall be the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, honoured in this world and in the next, and of those who are granted nearness to God; "
 
Islam does not deny that Christ came in the flesh. To the contrary, the Qur’an affirms it in at least nine places. Here is one:

[3:46] "When the angels said, 'O Mary, God gives thee glad tidings of a son through a Word from Him; his name shall be the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, honoured in this world and in the next, and of those who are granted nearness to God; "
To avoid confusion, let us first define Who the Christ is: the only begotten Son of God, co-eternal and consubstantial with the Father, possessing two natures - human and divine, yet appearing in human flesh. Islam, Judaism Mormonism, JWs, Oneness Pentecostals and many others deny this.
 
To avoid confusion, let us first define Who the Christ
The definition of Christ is Messiah. That is what John had in mind when he stated that those who deny Christ came in the flesh were the anti-Christ. These were gnostics who denied that the Messiah ever had a human body. It has nothing to do with the Trinity or with the christology promoted at the Council of Chaldean, neither of which had been formulated when John wrote his epistles.
 
To avoid confusion, let us first define Who the Christ is: the only begotten Son of God, co-eternal and consubstantial with the Father, possessing two natures - human and divine, yet appearing in human flesh. Islam, Judaism Mormonism, JWs, Oneness Pentecostals and many others deny this.
Is it safe to say Catholics have much more unity with Protestants who adhere to the Apostles’ Creed and Nicene Creed? As a reformed credal confessional Christian, I have a lot in common with Catholics.
 
There is a huge difference between Islam and Christianity:

“Islam is a religion in which God requires you to send your son to die for him.
Christianity is a faith in which God sent his Son to die for you.”

Islam Does Not Mean Peace. The quran says: “Fight and slay the pagans [Christians] wherever ye find them and seize them, confine them, and lie in wait for them in every place of ambush” (Surah 9:5)

Consider, too, that quranic text describes a sensual paradise where believing men are rewarded by being wed to virgins with “full grown”, “swelling” or “pears-shaped” breasts. (The quran does not actually state the commonly referenced “72 virgins”.) Compare that to the eternal spiritual peace of Christianity and you won’t have to search too much further to see that one is sourced in human (Mohammed) terms, while the other is based in spiritual terms.
 
Catholics and Protestants share a common baptism, so we are indeed closer; in fact, Marian and doctrinal disagreements notwithstanding, Protestants are truly our brothers in Christ and share the grace of adoption as we do.

Muslims are not baptized and are therefore not adopted sons of the Father, and in a way, they are not God’s children (I mean this in the sense of adoption, not in terms of a common Creator), so no, in a real sense, they are not our brothers in the same way Protestants are.
 
The Quran specifically teaches that Jesus was not crucified.
As far as I am aware, the Quran doesn’t say he was not crucified but “appeared” to have been crucified".

The trouble is 650 years removed from the actual event, lots of misconceptions will arise.

MJ
 
There is a huge difference between Islam and Christianity:

“Islam is a religion in which God requires you to send your son to die for him.
Christianity is a faith in which God sent his Son to die for you.”
There is nothing in the Qur’an or the hadith that says this.
Islam Does Not Mean Peace. The quran says: “Fight and slay the pagans [Christians] wherever ye find them and seize them, confine them, and lie in wait for them in every place of ambush” (Surah 9:5)
You might try placing such passages in their context. Here is the passage which proceeds it:

[9:4] (But the treaties are) not dissolved with those Pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term: for Allah loveth the righteous.

And here is the one that follows:
  1. If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah. and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge.
This was not a call for wholesale slaughter. It was a call for battle in a specific situation. It needs to be read in the context of similar verses:
“Fight those who fight against you along God’s way, yet do not initiate hostilities; God does not love aggressors.”

If there is a difference between the Islamic concept of jihad and St. Augustine’s concept of a just war, I’d like to know what it is.
Consider, too, that quranic text describes a sensual paradise where believing men are rewarded by being wed to virgins with “full grown”, “swelling” or “pears-shaped” breasts. (The quran does not actually state the commonly referenced “72 virgins”.) Compare that to the eternal spiritual peace of Christianity
Uh, when I read the Biblical references to heaven it speaks of pearly gates and streets of gold. Could it be that both texts are being metaphorical? Huri (often translated as virgins) is one of the few words in the Arabic language that carry no gender whatsoever. Baha’u’llah uses the Huri is the symbol of the Holy Spirit.
 
How about the Catechism of the Catholic Church since that source calls Protestants (baptized in Triune formula) separated brethren in Christ. That has to have significant theological truth to it.
Have I said anything different? By our baptism we are made brothers and sister in Christ, yet we are separated to the degree that the apostolic faith is rejected. The Eucharist is a biggy. If my brother runs away from home, he is still my brother? Of course.
 
Do Catholics have the same unity with Muslims as they do with Protestants?

Sometimes it’s simply a misunderstanding since forum site conversation is very limited. However, it seems to me that some on here believe Catholics have the same unity with Muslims as the do with Protestants (baptized in Triune formula). I think that is incorrect scripturally and the Catechism of the Catholic Church too. What are your thoughts on the issue in our pluralistic world? Does it even matter that Protestants are united to Christ and Muslims are not in Catholic theology?

🍿
I think you have created yet another strawman, CU. There are no Catholics here that espouse such a view.

The CC teaches that those who are baptized in a Triune formula are made members of the One Body.

There may be members of the One Body that are not visibly so, but since their connection is mystical, and not evident to us, there is no way that we experience the same unity.
 
Here is another point Father P. When a Protestant who was baptized in the Triune formula and converts to the Catholic Faith, we know that the Catholic Church will not rebaptize that convert. I’m sure it’s the same for Orthodox Christians and other Triune Christians too who convert to the Catholic Faith.

So, why do Mormon Christians and other non-Triune worshipers of God have to be baptized when they convert to the Catholic Faith? If baptism is considered when Catholics are born again, how can the Church teach that non-Christian religions can lead to Heaven without partaking in the sacrament of baptism?
We don’t. All who are saved are saved through Christ’s shed blood on the cross. He is the baptizer, and He can baptize those He chooses. He has brought all those who awaited His appearing into His kingdom, unless you repudiate Heb. 11. According to your standard, none of those mentioned in that chapter are united to Christ.
 
Indeed. Islam is not a revealed religion, and there is no evidence that I am aware of that Muhammad tested the spirit that spoke to him. Any religion that denies that Christ came in the flesh is false, by definition. Yet, all religions have some element of truth in them, else they would be flatly rejected.

What strikes me is that demons will not insult the Blessed Virgin, so they tempt man to do their work for them. After having difficulty with Catholic Marian doctrine for years, I now realize that she is the key to unity, as her entire purpose is to lead us to Christ. This is especially true with the Muslims.
Yes, have there not been several apparitions of Mary to Muslims, one witnessed by hundreds of thousands, possibly a million people in Egypt at a Coptic Orthodox Church from 1968 to 1970. Muslims had just marked the doors of Christians with red crosses and were on the verge of a masacre. Mary’s appearance stopped the whole thing. Muslims were being cured from polio, blindness, cancer… Pretty fascinating.

youtube.com/watch?v=NKHaN…eature=related
 
The definition of Christ is Messiah. That is what John had in mind when he stated that those who deny Christ came in the flesh were the anti-Christ. These were gnostics who denied that the Messiah ever had a human body. It has nothing to do with the Trinity or with the christology promoted at the Council of Chaldean, neither of which had been formulated when John wrote his epistles.
Whoa! Christianity gets to define the Christ. And, that definition is exactly what I posted. If one has a different definition, then one has a different messiah. It does not matter one whit what others believe him/her/it to be. What matters is the revealed Truth.

Islam flatly denies that God has a Son. In that precise sense, they deny the Messiah.
 
Do Catholics have the same unity with Muslims as they do with Protestants?

Sometimes it’s simply a misunderstanding since forum site conversation is very limited. However, it seems to me that some on here believe Catholics have the same unity with Muslims as the do with Protestants (baptized in Triune formula).
I don’t think there are people on here who think we have the same unity with Muslims as with Protestants (i’ve never read anything suggesting that on here). Clearly we have far. far more unity with our brothers and sisters in Christ.

However, not having the same degree of unity with Muslims should NOT equate to to the degree of hostility (sometimes quite extreme) that is sometimes seen on here (and elsewhere).

Muslims, along with Jews, worship the one true God of Abraham, as we do, and have the roots of their faith in Old Testament Scripture, as we do. In that, there does lie a degree of doctrinal agreement and common purpose that ought to be treasured.

Nostra Aetate 3
“The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.”

From the Catechism
CCC 841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.” 330
 
I think you have created yet another strawman, CU. There are no Catholics here that espouse such a view.

The CC teaches that those who are baptized in a Triune formula are made members of the One Body.

There may be members of the One Body that are not visibly so, but since their connection is mystical, and not evident to us, there is no way that we experience the same unity.
I’m glad to read these postings Guanophore. It was not a stawman’s thread, rather I was really concerned what I was reading the last few days. Sometimes it seems Catholics have a tendency to overreact against Protestants and forget that we are both united to Christ. I have seen Catholics compared baptized Protestants to Muslims, Jews, Mormons, and JWs which is incorrect. I think the correction has been made on here. 👍
 
There is a huge difference between Islam and Christianity:

“Islam is a religion in which God requires you to send your son to die for him.
Christianity is a faith in which God sent his Son to die for you.”

Islam Does Not Mean Peace. The quran says: “Fight and slay the pagans [Christians] wherever ye find them and seize them, confine them, and lie in wait for them in every place of ambush” (Surah 9:5)

Consider, too, that quranic text describes a sensual paradise where believing men are rewarded by being wed to virgins with “full grown”, “swelling” or “pears-shaped” breasts. (The quran does not actually state the commonly referenced “72 virgins”.) Compare that to the eternal spiritual peace of Christianity and you won’t have to search too much further to see that one is sourced in human (Mohammed) terms, while the other is based in spiritual terms.
You know, many Christians committed violence in the name of God…
And it seems you know little about the Qur’an…
 
I’m glad to read these postings Guanophore. It was not a stawman’s thread, rather I was really concerned what I was reading the last few days. Sometimes it seems Catholics have a tendency to overreact against Protestants and forget that we are both united to Christ. I have seen Catholics compared baptized Protestants to Muslims, Jews, Mormons, and JWs which is incorrect. I think the correction has been made on here. 👍
All the more reason you need to read up on Catholicism. The truth is reached, not by dialog and consensus, but by individual hearts denying themselves, taking up their crosses daily and following Christ - wherever He leads them. If they are not lead to unity, then they are not following Christ but rather, some worldly spirit.

The Holy Spirit unites.
The demon divides.
 
I’m glad to read these postings Guanophore. It was not a stawman’s thread, rather I was really concerned what I was reading the last few days. Sometimes it seems Catholics have a tendency to overreact against Protestants and forget that we are both united to Christ. I have seen Catholics compared baptized Protestants to Muslims, Jews, Mormons, and JWs which is incorrect. I think the correction has been made on here. 👍
You have a tendancy to completley miss the purpose of making such comparisons. My feeling is that you are just skimming over the posts and not absorbing whatt is being said.
I have asked you more than once now to please respond to points I have made concerning the common Protestant view of the Eucharist and why that causes a huge division between us; as important as the Trinity or any other Christian doctrine. So far you have refused to address it.

Why is it okay to deny the Eucharist and then claim to be in closer union with the Catholic Church than one who denies the Trinity? You minimize the source and summit of the Christian faith to the point that it has become optional as far as being Christian. The same Church that defined the Trinity and proclaimed it to be divinely revlealed Truth did the same with the Eucharist. One cannot deny the Eucharist and be in unity with the Catholic Church any more than one can deny the Trinity and be in unity.

The whole point, as I and others have said before, is that one is in unity with the Catholic Church to the extent that one has retained the doctrines of the Apostolic faith. There is so much division and disagreement among Protestants that we cannot just compare a “Protestant” to Catholicism other religions. Oneness Pentecostals claim to be Christian but deny the Trinity. You claim to be Christian while denying the Eucharist. So who is in closer communion with the Catholic Church? Mormons claim to be Christian and yet are polytheistic. Muslims are monotheistic. Who is in closer communion with the Catholic Church?

There is no one line we can draw to say “you’re in” and “you’re out”. I will say that a valid Christian baptism unites us in a way that cannot occur with an unbaptized person, but we, as Catholics, always turn to the mercy of God in whom we can have hope for all people, even those who have never been taught the truth about Christ.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top