we will have to agree to disagree. i understand the confusion. i can see both sides of the argument. i just found more preachers saying you can’t vote pro-abortion. ymmv
you mean support of:
Are you saying the Democratic Party published this?Excuse me -
I didn’t say YOU posted it now, DID I?
I said that “delicate” little group known as the DEMOCRATS did.
And of course, the bullying name-calling always gives them away. Seriously hope many lawsuits result from their antics. Oh and boycotts. Which always work
Feeding the hungry, giving drink to thirsty, welcoming the stranger, clothing the naked, tcaring for the sick, supporting the imprisoned.
we all support that
Many do. But not all. And these are non-negotiable.
What does that mean? Why are you asking me to justify them?
I agree to disagree, but I have generally found the people that say you can’t vote for supporters of abortion rights tend to be Catholic layman who have no authority and choose not to understand the USCCB’s voter’s guide and not actual priests.
you can never say all, but most. having a different way of addressing the issue doesn’t make it negotiable.
are they in line with church teaching?
Dont’ be ridiculous. He has not said or done anything to support that he has repented of anything. He changes his colors like a chameleon when it suits his goals. It is enough that he has not publicly supported abortion and a host of other evils. We need not presume that any inner transformation has occurred.
Non-negotiable?
On the other hand, there are “Catholic layman” who abdicate all personal responsibility for whatever moral rectitude and fortitude they may have accidentally acquired by turning it over to the culture at large (the world, the flesh and the devil) and then justify that lack of nobility and courage by waving a USCCB’s voter’s guide as if a pamphlet has the ability to divine deep moral issues far better than one’s own well- or ill- formed conscience.
Especially when we can far more easily presume it hasn’t.
