Do Jews believe in honor killing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harrypot
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes your reply was very funny the way you tried to answer a question which was not asked.

You said:
**
If she is a daughter of a priest who is now a prostitute, the Torah commands it. **

It means in this case such a Jewish ‘prostitute’ “shall be burnt with fire.”, as per Holy Torah?

Then you started saying:
"But, I again point out that there are no more priests in Judaism and this term for prostitute may only refer to one who services a temple of a pagan god."

This is not what Iasked in my OP. Hence it was…lol.
That actually wasn’t me who said that. Still, it doesn’t seem terribly funny, I didn’t even chuckle… you must have an odd sense of humor. 🤷
 
Do Jews believe in honor killing? If not, should they? since the Holy Torah says:

Leviticus 21:9

“If the daughter of a priest be taken in whoredom, and dishonour the name of her father, she shall be burnt with fire.”

Latin Vulgate Bible
Do Christians believe in honor killing? If not, should they? since the Holy Bible says:

Leviticus 21:9 “If the daughter of a priest be taken in whoredom, and dishonour the name of her father, she shall be burnt with fire.” Latin Vulgate Bible.

rossum
 
Do Christians believe in honor killing? If not, should they? since the Holy Bible says:

Leviticus 21:9 “If the daughter of a priest be taken in whoredom, and dishonour the name of her father, she shall be burnt with fire.” Latin Vulgate Bible.

rossum
Christians may say: That law is abrogated by Jesus because God (Jesus) changed his mind and there are no priests in Christianity, anyway.
But wait I think there are priests in Catholicism…so is this law still valid if Pope enforced Catholic law in his place of sovereignty?
 
Do Christians believe in honor killing? If not, should they? since the Holy Bible says:

Leviticus 21:9 “If the daughter of a priest be taken in whoredom, and dishonour the name of her father, she shall be burnt with fire.” Latin Vulgate Bible.

rossum
Christians also believe in Satan, but they never do whatever Satan commands.

The reference you have cited is from the Mosaic Law, which was given by the same God to Israel alone. Since Christians know that God gave the Law to a certain nation and some precepts of that Law were for a certain period of time (temporary), they do not practice it.
 
Christians may say: That law is abrogated by Jesus because God (Jesus) changed his mind and there are no priests in Christianity, anyway.
But wait I think there are priests in Catholicism…so is this law still valid if Pope enforced Catholic law in his place of sovereignty?
Christians would never use the word “abrogation” while talking about Jesus’ approach to the Mosaic Law. The term abrogation is peculiar to Islam, the god of which cannot easily decide which rule to impose on the same group of believers living in the same era.

The priesthood in Judaism and the priesthood in Christianity are not identical. More, you seem to forget that Catholic priests are not allowed to marry and cannot have daughters to burn with fire.
 
The priesthood in Judaism and the priesthood in Christianity are not identical.
Jesus of Gospels was a Jew thus he must be the highest priest (atleast of his time). He did not abolish the stoning punishment.

Or perhaps there was an another high priest who was higher than Jesus with no beginning and no end?
… Catholic priests are not allowed to marry and cannot have daughters to burn with fire.
Is 'honor killing ’ the reason these poor Catholic priests are not allowed to marry so that the question of “honor killing” should not arise in the first place?..🙂

Or what else is the real reason these priests are not allowed to have wives and live a normal life like any other human being? Did Jesus impose this restriction on your priests?
 
Christians would never use the word “abrogation” while talking about Jesus’ approach to the Mosaic Law. The term abrogation is peculiar to Islam, the god of which cannot easily decide which rule to impose on the same group of believers living in the same era.
Did your Jesus not ABOLISH the Law (of Torah) for you, according to your theology?
 
Jesus of Gospels was a Jew thus he must be the highest priest (atleast of his time). He did not abolish the stoning punishment.

Or perhaps there was an another high priest who was higher than Jesus with no beginning and no end?
What do you mean? Every Jew is automatically and essentially a high priest? Where did you get this ridiculous teaching from? :confused:
Is 'honor killing ’ the reason these poor Catholic priests are not allowed to marry so that the question of “honor killing” should not arise in the first place?..🙂

Or what else is the real reason these priests are not allowed to have wives and live a normal life like any other human being? Did Jesus impose this restriction on your priests?
Although I am not in the mood to counter silly questions with silly answers right now, I shall do my best. The rule in Leviticus concerns only female children of a priest, not male ones. Thus, a priest could be allowed to marry and have sons without necessarily validating the commandment in the Mosaic Law.

Back to serious speech, you sound very confused about the notion of enforced celibacy. I suggest you do a comparative research on the major differences between the priesthood in Judaism and the priesthood in Christianity.
 
Christians may say: That law is abrogated by Jesus because God (Jesus) changed his mind and there are no priests in Christianity, anyway.
So your answer is that same as the Jewish answer: “That rule is not longer operational, it has been superseded by later writings.” Was that really so hard to work out for yourself?

rossum
 
I am not sure where I learned this piece of information but my understanding of prostitutes in ancient times is not always the same as what we think of as prostitutes today. Prostitutes were often priestesses of fertility godesses and worked in temples as prostitutes to honor these goddesses and to bring about the fertility of crops.
 
Either he’s a troll or Harry is a Muslim trying to prove"honor killings"were Biblical so’ Honor Killings" can theoretically justified.:eek:
 
Julia is right. He was hoping to show that Judaism is as mysogynistic and brutal as some hold Islam to be. That is a lost cause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top