Do you mean like the mormons?
(bolding mine)
Many of the original revelations of the Mormon Doctrine and Covenants Scripture were published in the 1833 Book of Commandments. Two years later, when these revelations were re-published in the first edition of Doctrine and Covenants, significant changes became apparent
en.fairmormon.org/Doctrine_and_Covenants_textual_changes
Me thinks that you read too many antimormon sites.
Criticism
Joseph Smith made revisions, additions, and deletions to his early revelations when preparing them for publication. Critics claim that revelations from God are inerrant and should never be changed, and this proves that Joseph Smith did not receive revelation.
Critics claim that the revelations in the Book of Commandments were modified because they were “showing their age,” “contained outdated information,” “included erroneous statements” and “abandoned doctrines.” Some of the revelations “revealed too much information about LDS beliefs.”
See also: Source(s) of the criticism
Response
How do the LDS understand prophetic revelation?
It is important to realize that the LDS Church does not believe in a doctrine of prophetic inerrancy. Prophets are not fax machines; they do not simply “download” messages from God. Rather, God inspires prophets through a variety of means: the prophet may be given precise words to speak or simply receive information which he is to communicate in any way which suits his listeners. Many critics come from conservative Protestant backgrounds and religious traditions which endorse doctrines of Biblical inerrancy. (Some members of the Church may also have absorbed some ‘fundamentalist’ ideas about scripture and prophets.) Both groups of people will be troubled by this doctrine because it does not match their preconceptions, but Joseph Smith cannot be faulted for not following a prophetic model which he never endorsed and which the Church does not teach.
Furthermore, revelation is not always an instantaneous event—it may often be a process of studying a matter out, and applying reason and effort to achieve greater clarity and understanding.[1]
The Doctrine and Covenants itself announces that:
Behold, I am God and have spoken it; these commandments are of me, and were given unto my servants in their weakness, after the manner of their language, that they might come to understanding.D&C 1:24
Thus, the Doctrine and Covenants acknowledges the weakness of the prophets through which they came, and insists that the wording is in the manner of their language, not direct, word-for-word divine sound bites.
Brigham Young (who authored one of the revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants—D&C 136: described the process in similar terms:
I do not even believe that there is a single revelation, among the many God has given to the Church, that is perfect in its fulness. The revelations of God contain correct doctrine and principle, so far as they go; but it is impossible for the poor, weak, low, grovelling, sinful inhabitants of the earth to receive a revelation from the Almighty in all its perfections. He has to speak to us in a manner to meet the extent of our capacities…
The laws that the Lord has given are not fully perfect, because the people could not receive them in their perfect fulness; but they can receive a little here and a little there, a little today and a little to-morrow, a little more next week, and a little more in advance of that next year, if they make a wise improvement upon every little they receive…[2]
And, there were even times when others besides Joseph were assigned to collaborate in writing the revelations—clear evidence that there was not “only one true” version of the revelation. (See D&C 124:12-16.)
Who made the changes?
Richard Lloyd Anderson wrote:
First Presidency members were assigned to compile “the items of the doctrine” of the Church from the standard works, including “the revelations which have been given to the Church up to this date or shall be, until such arrangement is made” (Kirtland High Council Minute Book, 24 September 1834; also cited in History of The Church 2:165. (subscript. required) GospeLink). This resolution might suggest the correction of former wording through revelation. [The revised D&C was] issued in August 1835 with a 17 February 1835 preface signed by the Prophet, Oliver Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon, and Frederick G. Williams, the revision committee.[3]
Thus, the First Presidency of the time supervised the revisions.
Changes were not hidden from the Church
Critics attempt to trouble Latter-day Saints who have not considered the fact one aspect of the prophet’s mission includes the editing and modification of revelation prior to publication. The critics often act as if these changes are a type of “dirty secret” which the Church is “hiding” from its members.
Unfortunately for the critics, there is plenty of evidence that the Church has done nothing to hide the fact that changes were made
