G
goout
Guest
Invincible ignorance also addresses man as a moral subject as he exercises his conscience to make these decisions.
This is more than a matter of merely having access to information, such as: “the CC is necessary for salvation”. Having information is only the start of forming a conscience and using that conscience to make moral evaluations. There are many factors that go into moral evaluation. Those factors include information but are nowhere near limited to information. There are many circumstances that help form our consciences and lead to a particular moral evaluation…
One of the keys is, the moral law points us to apprehending and attaining the highest good. And so the level of knowledge and the relative uprightness of the conscience should not be presumptuous to ignorance.
In other words, we ought to “aim high” and expect that we can come to see the highest good. The Church doesn’t teach about “invincible ignorance” to provide excuses.
Nor does it teach about this for Catholics to wield condemnation or fear on non Catholics.
This is more than a matter of merely having access to information, such as: “the CC is necessary for salvation”. Having information is only the start of forming a conscience and using that conscience to make moral evaluations. There are many factors that go into moral evaluation. Those factors include information but are nowhere near limited to information. There are many circumstances that help form our consciences and lead to a particular moral evaluation…
One of the keys is, the moral law points us to apprehending and attaining the highest good. And so the level of knowledge and the relative uprightness of the conscience should not be presumptuous to ignorance.
In other words, we ought to “aim high” and expect that we can come to see the highest good. The Church doesn’t teach about “invincible ignorance” to provide excuses.
Nor does it teach about this for Catholics to wield condemnation or fear on non Catholics.
Last edited: