Crusader13
New member
You’re misunderstanding the actual doctrine of salvation as it pertains to non-Catholics. There are those who may be saved, by following the natural law, without having any knowledge of Jesus or the Church. These are instances known only to God. Nobody can point to a specific non-Catholic individual as an example and say “see, this person can be saved because they are following their conscience.”
The truth is we don’t know the exact fate of any non-Catholic. We are told to go and make disciples of all nations because there’s only one Kingdom. And you’re either in or you’re out. There’s no third option.
And Jesus was very specific about what we needed to do. It’s a flat out contradiction to imply that any religion that openly rejects the divinity of Jesus Christ is salvific.
If God wills the existence of these religions and their members can be saved by rejecting Jesus; then WHY DO WE NEED THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? In short, we don’t. The Church, baptism, the Eucharist, they all become optional and merely a preference, not a necessity.
The truth is we don’t know the exact fate of any non-Catholic. We are told to go and make disciples of all nations because there’s only one Kingdom. And you’re either in or you’re out. There’s no third option.
And Jesus was very specific about what we needed to do. It’s a flat out contradiction to imply that any religion that openly rejects the divinity of Jesus Christ is salvific.
If God wills the existence of these religions and their members can be saved by rejecting Jesus; then WHY DO WE NEED THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? In short, we don’t. The Church, baptism, the Eucharist, they all become optional and merely a preference, not a necessity.