It seems that God has chosen a plurality of religions, rather than allowed it.
But if that’s the case, why would God choose to give us contradictions? It can’t be both that Jesus is God, and that he is not, (if that makes sense).
I would say the opposite is true, if we obeyed our scriptures there would be no wars
You are right and that’s true in theory and in a perfect world, but has it really played out this way in the real world?
In the real world, beyond just love of neighbour, people of different religions get caught in who’s is right and fight over it.
Life is a “dynamic experience”, and involves many decisions where different religious viewpoints are incompatible, and then someone becomes angry and tensions grow.
For example, there were some instance in my country where:
- Muslim taxi drivers rejected passengers with guide dog because they believed that dogs are dirty according to their religion.
- There were others who refused to carry passengers who had sealed bottles of alcohol, as they were hyper-religious & felt they could not be in the presence of alcohol.
- Another driver refused to transport an elderly couple who were holding a Christmas ham that they won at the local RSL club.
There are many more examples.
So in situations like this, where a believer of this religions values not only differ from their host country, but actually
impose on people of the host country, how does one love God & the neighbour?
And which neighbour do we love-
-the blind person with the guide dog?
or
-the strict Muslim Taxi driver?
Because ultimately somebody is not going to be happy.
It is easy to talk about the commandments but often more complex to play out in real life situations.
How do we act out Christian love and peace, but not fall into the political correctness trap that is so prevalent in western countries today?
I.e., does love your neighbour mean that we should accommodate extreme/inflexible religious mindsets when they are not healthy- neither for society nor for the individual?
Does love of neighbour mean that France should have allowed public wear of the niqab to show religious tolerance… no matter how extreme the religious expression is?
Even though some female
children are made/conditioned to wear it, thus ironically creating a sexualization of children by bringing adult concepts onto them.
Who should “we” love here, the deeply religious person & their “rights”, or that innocent child’s “rights”?
Clearly there are many many moderate Muslims who are good hearted people, but I chose to use these examples, because the commandments are not always straightforward in complex situations where religious belief influences social behaviour & causes social clashes.
Should love of neighbour mean not (respectfully) challenging extreme mentalities?