J
Jordan_Francis
Guest
One aspect of Christ’s coming that I never heard mentioned when I attended a Protestant church regularly was that God had to become incarnate in order to bring the world of flesh into His Own Being.
The constant emphasis on the judiciary aspect of salvation seemed to almost completely overlook its more poetic and certainly more human dimension- that God became man so that man might become God (as in, partake in the Divine Nature). I never heard of such ideas as “theosis” or “Beatific Vision”.
The Incarnation resolved the dilemna of dualism in which the flesh had run rampant from the innermost desires of the spirit. By becoming flesh God actually took human nature into Himself.
While Protestant theology obviously discusses the Incarnation, I have never personally encountered it in terms of it representing this deep and personal union of the natures of God and man. The Protestant Incarnation sometimes seems so removed from us in terms of our relationship with God and instead, seems isolated only to a single point in history.
The constant emphasis on the judiciary aspect of salvation seemed to almost completely overlook its more poetic and certainly more human dimension- that God became man so that man might become God (as in, partake in the Divine Nature). I never heard of such ideas as “theosis” or “Beatific Vision”.
The Incarnation resolved the dilemna of dualism in which the flesh had run rampant from the innermost desires of the spirit. By becoming flesh God actually took human nature into Himself.
While Protestant theology obviously discusses the Incarnation, I have never personally encountered it in terms of it representing this deep and personal union of the natures of God and man. The Protestant Incarnation sometimes seems so removed from us in terms of our relationship with God and instead, seems isolated only to a single point in history.