M
Morningkill
Guest
Hold on - you are claiming that sola scriptura is Biblical?However, it is my claim that it is Biblical
There are a number of problems with that
i) No, it’s not
ii) Even if it was, that proves nothing - save the fact that you have a document which authenticates itself. That is circular logic.
Let’s be honest - there is no “we” here; which of the 35,000 different flavors of Protestant are you? “Sola Scriptura” means “scripture alone” - and that seems to be what you are saying it means.and it is my belief, based on many interactions with Catholics on this topic that you’re basing it on what you’ve been told sola scriptura is, rather than what we actually believe.
But, please, tell me what you believe about this central issue. And then let’s debate and discuss that - start by telling me how sola scriptura is Biblical.
But it does make it true - which is the more important issue. Non-Catholic Christians (such as yourself) are wrong on a great many issues. And sola scriptura and the issue that people can be saved without explicit, conscious knowledge of Jesus are two issues personal to you, it seems.Good for them. That still doesn’t make it Biblical.