Do you think fake news is used on CNN and msnlsd? to deceive and control?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimcarry
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep it’s the left.
More fake news. What about killing the innocent girl in Charlottesville? THAT was the right. If you’re referring to the DC protesters at the inauguration, they were all let off.

And yes, if I saw these monsters in a restaurant, I would yell at them too.
 
40.png
steve-b:
Sorry, you’re dead wrong. It’s the SAME story. The only difference is they say they are going to re-start a 2nd blast furnace at that plant later this year.

So if Trump tells an outright lie, that’s easily checked, you still think he’s telling the truth? Really?
And how different it was reported between your source and a business source.
 
40.png
steve-b:
Yep it’s the left.
More fake news. What about killing the innocent girl in Charlottesville? THAT was the right. If you’re referring to the DC protesters at the inauguration, they were all let off.

And yes, if I saw these monsters in a restaurant, I would yell at them too.
The left are the violent ones.

Not a conservative news source by any means Imagine if conservatives disrupted a Clinton rally: Column

AND

Mike Pence and family, insulted by the cast and audience at Hamilton play. Trump demands apology from Hamilton cast after Mike Pence booed | Mike Pence | The Guardian What people might not know, is the price per seat for that play. My neighbor took his family to NYC, and paid over $400 / seat for his family. I can’t imagine what Pence paid. Seats apparently go for a range of $300 - $1500 / seat. Whatever price Pence paid for he and his family, That’s a lot of money to pay to be insulted.
 
Last edited:
As you then know, the Mexico City Policy goes in and out of effect with varying administrations. Mr Trump was fully expected to make it active (even though it is a paper tiger).
 
As you then know, the Mexico City Policy goes in and out of effect with varying administrations. Mr Trump was fully expected to make it active (even though it is a paper tiger).
Trump not only took funding away, as Republicans do when a Republican is in the presidency, Trump greatly expanded the removal of funding for abortion by executive order. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/02/14/trumps-mexico-city-policy-or-global-gag-rule . As I previously said, that’s NOT written by a supporter. The writer probably hates Trump’s guts for what he did.

I’ve also posted this homily many times, from Fr Joseph Mary Wolf at an EWTN mass, about Fr Jose’s NDE,
Note: He was allowed to see hell. Note the main reasons people were there. Even priests and bishops who he knew were there. Why were THEY there?
 
Last edited:
You might consider that a small number of vocal people on both sides of any issue will use hyperbole. That is what is being used by HRW. HRW considers the slightest attempt to restrict abortion as a complete and total ban even if the mother is exploding like the monster from Alien.

Read the actual text of the Mexico City Policy. Understand the big juicy loopholes.

About the private revelation, they are called private for a reason. We are not bound to follow them.
 
You might consider that a small number of vocal people on both sides of any issue will use hyperbole. That is what is being used by HRW. HRW considers the slightest attempt to restrict abortion as a complete and total ban even if the mother is exploding like the monster from Alien.

Read the actual text of the Mexico City Policy. Understand the big juicy loopholes.

About the private revelation, they are called private for a reason. We are not bound to follow them.
I’m just giving information here. You’re free to accept or reject it. I don’t force anyone.

Re: private revelation, there is NOTHING in that story/homily I posted , that goes against what the Church understands and teaches about sin and particularly the sins mentioned…
 
Last edited:
Denzil Washington (very devout Pentecostal christian) has a quote: ‘If you don’t read the news you are uninformed. If you do read the news you are misinformed.’
 
I considered it.
But a write-in would have been a vote for HRC, at least according to all the polls and all the pundits (including the conservative ones), and there was no way I was handing the presidency to her
 
But a write-in would have been a vote for HRC, at least according to all the polls and all the pundits (including the conservative ones), and there was no way I was handing the presidency to her
The way things went, I think it would have been a vote for Trump. Clinton only got the states that would vote Democratic no matter who ran Republican. Kind of surprising her electoral count ws so low. I would not vote for either Clinton or Trump; hence, a third-party or write-in for me.
 
I’m Canadian so it’s not quite the same but I almost NEVER vote for the two ‘main’ parties. The Liberals have a hard and fast no candidate in their party can be pro-life policy which I feel is just outright disgusting and not a party I would EVER vote for and the Conservatives from year to year go from in my favor to just annoying. LOL. I’m SO GLAD we have other choices. And one day maybe those other choices will outrun the Democrats and Republicans in your country if everyone gets smart.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top