S
stpaul
Guest
Do you think it’s wrong to separate illegal border crossers adult’s and children?
As far as the relationship between them goes, they should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. That is, they should not be separated just because the adult might be a trafficker or kidnapper or be some other dangerous criminal. It should be no different than the criteria used to take children away from parents who are citizens. There needs to be evidence that the parents (or so-called parents) are seriously unsuitable guardians of those children. Then and only then should the children be removed from their custody.Do you think it’s wrong to separate illegal border crossers adult’s and children?
What happens to the children in the meantime if the adult is indeed a trafficker or kidnapper or other dangerous criminal, though?As far as the relationship between them goes, they should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. That is, they should not be separated just because the adult might be a trafficker or kidnapper or be some other dangerous criminal
If there is evidence for that, the children will be taken from them. If there is no evidence for that, the children will remain with them. If they are dangerous criminals, but we don’t know it, the children will continue to be in danger. We do not have a duty to undertake the positive verification of the every parent/child relationship that presents itself. We don’t do it for our own citizens. Why should we do it for outsiders?LeafByNiggle:![]()
What happens to the children in the meantime if the adult is indeed a trafficker or kidnapper or other dangerous criminal, though?As far as the relationship between them goes, they should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. That is, they should not be separated just because the adult might be a trafficker or kidnapper or be some other dangerous criminal
No one disagrees with those separations - where the parent is a dangerous criminal. The debatable ones are the ones where we have nothing on them other than they crossed the border illegally.There are lots of times a person engaging in illegal activity is separated from the children who are present. Kids go into foster care or a group home when mom or dad is arrested, unless there is a relative to take them. Presumably, illegal border crossers have no relatives to take their children in at the time of arrest. US citizens who are arrested are subject to the same separation of parents and children. Who is the guilty person here, the parent who intentionally broke the law, or law enforcement? Ultimately, the separation is caused by the criminal behavior of the parent/adult illegal border crosser.
With our own citizens, we are not normally in a position to have no idea whether they are parent and child. When children of citizens are removed from their parents (e.g., put in foster care), it is because the parents have shown themselves unfit to parent (neglect, abuse, etc.), not because we doubt they are the parents.We don’t do it for our own citizens. Why should we do it for outsiders?
Turning them away without due process is not a great solution, but it is better than provisionally removing the children from all illegal border crossers. If we can’t find a more humane solution, then just deport them immediately.I think it wrong for people to enter the US illegally? So when the get caught, what are we to do? Apparently our laws say the person or persons have a right to plea there case before a judge. I would be happy if they were turned away without due process. Then waiting for trial, what should we do with the children? There are no easy answers. It is wrong to separate families. It is wrong to incarcerate children. It is wrong to let people enter illegally.
Well, it seems like some on this forum would like to equate all illegal immigrants with violent criminals; or, if not that, then as mooches who want to “take advantage” of our economy.No one disagrees with those separations - where the parent is a dangerous criminal. The debatable ones are the ones where we have nothing on them other than they crossed the border illegally.
You’re incorrect. Yes, we do question it, and yes, we do verify it.If there is evidence for that, the children will be taken from them. If there is no evidence for that, the children will remain with them. If they are dangerous criminals, but we don’t know it, the children will continue to be in danger. We do not have a duty to undertake the positive verification of the every parent/child relationship that presents itself. We don’t do it for our own citizens. Why should we do it for outsiders?
Sure we are. We don’t ask for birth certificates. We don’t do routine DNA tests. We just assume that the nice looking family living quietly in the suburbs is a real family - unless some information comes to light to challenge that assumption. The fact that we do not afford immigrants that same presumption says a lot more about our xenophobia than it does about them.LeafByNiggle:![]()
With our own citizens, we are not normally in a position to have no idea whether they are parent and child.We don’t do it for our own citizens. Why should we do it for outsiders?
When you cross the border, yes, we do.Sure we are. We don’t ask for birth certificates. We don’t do routine DNA tests. We just assume that the nice looking family living quietly in the suburbs is a real family - unless some information comes to light to challenge that assumption. The fact that we do not afford immigrants that same presumption says a lot more about our xenophobia than it does about them.
CTBcinWell, it seems like some on this forum would like to equate all illegal immigrants with violent criminals; or, if not that, then as mooches who want to “take advantage” of our economy.