J
Joe_5859
Guest
Amen to that.I pray I never attend Mass out of obligation, but only out of the ardent desire to worship The Lord!
Amen to that.I pray I never attend Mass out of obligation, but only out of the ardent desire to worship The Lord!
Desire comes and goes, but one must always act according to justice.I pray I never attend Mass out of obligation, but only out of the ardent desire to worship The Lord!
I think you are splitting hairs that shouldnât be split. As I understand it, the mind of the Church is that evening begins at First Vespers and we should think with the mind of the Church. I also understand that there are cases where another Mass may be used in place of the Sunday Mass, except, of course, on Solemnities.We need to be careful not to conflate two separate issues.
Yes, ordinarily a Saturday evening Mass will use the Sunday readings. But there are exceptions: weddings, funerals, etc. This is where it comes into play.
The Canon says only âA person who assists at a Mass celebrated anywhere in a Catholic rite either on the feast day itself or in the evening of the preceding day satisfies the obligation of participating in the Mass.â It doesnât say anything about having to be after First Vespers or using the readings for the day.
Jimmy Akin backs me up.![]()
That is not correct. The readings are not relevant to the Sunday obligation being fulfilled.Yes it is. The Saturday evening mass is, in effect, the Sunday Mass which is why it fulfills the obligation. You cannot attend a mass which has Saturdayâs readings and fulfil your obligation.
Why canât fulfilling your obligations be an expression of that ardent desire?I pray I never attend Mass out of obligation, but only out of the ardent desire to worship The Lord!
âIf you love Me, keep My commandments.âWhy canât fulfilling your obligations be an expression of that ardent desire?
Okay - I got it. But wouldnât it be illicit to use random readings, rather than those for the lectionary? I think the defeats the spirit of what was intended.There was some kerfluffle about this on Fr. Zâs blog recently and Ed Peters, a canonist of note, weighed in. Evening Masses always fulfill the following dayâs obligation regardless of choice of readings.
It is not a Sunday Mass unless it has readings for Sunday Mass, but we are not obliged to attend a Sunday Mass, just a Mass on Sunday. Follow?
Yes. I would agree with your analysis.On the contrary, Masses before the First Vespers of Sunday would not fulfill the Sunday obligation and to use Saturday readings on Sunday would appear to me to be liturgical abuse. That is, of course, only my opinion.
As far as I know, yes, it is forbidden for a priest to substitute readings on his own initiative. They must be approved for the day or, if it is a Mass for a special purpose (such as a wedding), they must be appropriate for that purpose.Okay - I got it. But wouldnât it be illicit to use random readings, rather than those for the lectionary? I think the defeats the spirit of what was intended.
Ooo! So Western!Why canât fulfilling your obligations be an expression of that ardent desire?
Yes, but the Church does not make people verify a Massâs liceityâdear God!âbefore extending the indulgence of fulfilling obligation to it.Okay - I got it. But wouldnât it be illicit to use random readings, rather than those for the lectionary? I think the defeats the spirit of what was intended.
No one has proposed ârandom readingsâ.Okay - I got it. But wouldnât it be illicit to use random readings, rather than those for the lectionary? I think the defeats the spirit of what was intended.
While Masses for the Dead were prohibited on Sunday in the Tridentine missal, they are not prohibited in the missal of Paul VI.(This is why All Souls Day is observed on a Sunday in the OF.) Nuptial Masses were never prohibited on Sunday. While both are extremely uncommon on a Sunday, neither are categorically forbidden.The Nuptial Mass and the Mass of Christian Burial are votive Masses that are not permitted to be celebrated on Sundays.
You can be married on a Sunday, but not with the Nuptial Mass. The Rite of Marriage is inserted into the Sunday Mass.While Masses for the Dead were prohibited on Sunday in the Tridentine missal, they are not prohibited in the missal of Paul VI.(This is why All Souls Day is observed on a Sunday in the OF.) Nuptial Masses were never prohibited on Sunday. While both are extremely uncommon on a Sunday, neither are categorically forbidden.
But -dear God! - the scenario you are suggesting would simply never take place save for the highly unlikely scenario of a Saturday evening wedding mass. Who the hell has their wedding in the evening?Yes, but the Church does not make people verify a Massâs liceityâdear God!âbefore extending the indulgence of fulfilling obligation to it.
So would that mean that the any marriage that takes place on either sat night or sunday would indeed use the sunday readings so it is, in fact, the Sunday mass.You can be married on a Sunday, but not with the Nuptial Mass. The Rite of Marriage is inserted into the Sunday Mass.
Plenty of people. I think a wedding is suited for the morning or early afternoon, but people do get married later.But -dear God! - the scenario you are suggesting would simply never take place save for the highly unlikely scenario of a Saturday evening wedding mass. Who the hell has their wedding in the evening?
A Saturday evening wedding mass need not use the Sunday readings. It may use ritual mass readings. Nothing illicit at all.But -dear God! - the scenario you are suggesting would simply never take place save for the highly unlikely scenario of a Saturday evening wedding mass. Who the hell has their wedding in the evening?