Does DNA evidence disprove Book of Mormon claims?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Middleman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Paul,
I understand why it appears to you that Joseph Smith was saying that the Hill Cumorah near where he lived was the same hill mentioned in Mormon 6, but in the first place, even if it were that same area they did not fight on the hill–they fought in the general area where the hill was, which could mean miles away from the hill itself, in scattered battles also with each army having a separate battle as described by Moroni.

. . .

In the third place, Joseph Smith wrote at one time that he saw a room full of records (in vision) that Moroni was familiar with, and that the plates deposited in the Hill Cumorah site were not the entire set of Nephite records, so just because Moroni talks about a “hill called Cumorah” does not necessarily mean that the hill near Joseph Smith was the same hill. Moroni could have placed those particular plates in that particular hill near where Joseph Smith would be living in 1823, at any point during the 36 years after that battle described in Mormon 6. Moroni was also a resurrected being, so he could have moved the plates at any point as a resurrected being, also. He was the custodian of the sacred plates, with that particular responsibility given to him by God.
There is so much wriggling that needs to be done to make the BOM “work”. It doesn’t matter if they didn’t fight directly on the hill, if there was a battle, I’m pretty sure some kind of archeological evidence would have been discovered in the 1,625 years there have been to discover said artifacts.

Why do you need to complicate the whole Moroni with the gold plates deal? How many hills are there called Cumorah? You have to assume (hope) that there is some other hill out there called Cumorah so that you can say, “It’s impossible to know where to excavate.” One question that I’m sure you get a lot, if these gold plates were so important, why didn’t God want everyone to see them? I mean, He makes His will known through your current prophets, correct? Why would he not want everyone to be able to see His supreme will as dictated through the plates that the BOM supposedly came from? I find that hard to believe.

Also one more thing, what do you mean that Moroni could have moved the plates anytime as a resurrected being? Are you saying he had some kind of magical teleportation powers or are you saying he could just walk a very long distance?
In the second place, verse 15 talks about “a few who had escaped into the south countries”, which does not lead one to believe that the place being described is what is now upstate New York.
Why not? There was nothing resembling current or even the 19th century New York in 385 AD, all of the area around them would have been “country,” I’m not sure what you’re trying to say.
 
There is so much wriggling that needs to be done to make the BOM “work”. It doesn’t matter if they didn’t fight directly on the hill, if there was a battle, I’m pretty sure some kind of archeological evidence would have been discovered in the 1,625 years there have been to discover said artifacts.

Why do you need to complicate the whole Moroni with the gold plates deal? How many hills are there called Cumorah? You have to assume (hope) that there is some other hill out there called Cumorah so that you can say, “It’s impossible to know where to excavate.” One question that I’m sure you get a lot, if these gold plates were so important, why didn’t God want everyone to see them? I mean, He makes His will known through your current prophets, correct? Why would he not want everyone to be able to see His supreme will as dictated through the plates that the BOM supposedly came from? I find that hard to believe.

Also one more thing, what do you mean that Moroni could have moved the plates anytime as a resurrected being? Are you saying he had some kind of magical teleportation powers or are you saying he could just walk a very long distance?

Why not? There was nothing resembling current or even the 19th century New York in 385 AD, all of the area around them would have been “country,” I’m not sure what you’re trying to say.
Zach Dunn,
First of all, I might as well get to a direct point that is central to this whole set of questions. You asked why “didn’t God want everyone to see them.” For anyone to think that an infinitely intelligent Person would not have a testing process that was not merely, “let’s see if you will obey Me if I give you every possible evidence that you could want and then see if you will obey My will” seems amazing to me (sorry if that fits anyone). (No, I’m not speaking for God–I am merely saying in mortal words that God would have higher plans in His plan than such an obviously wrong concept of testing as that.)

Here we read all through the epistles in the New Testament that God wants humankind to have spiritual knowledge, and does not want that knowledge to have come the same way as mortal wisdom of man comes–yet why would one then believe that God makes an about-face and provides humanly devised and humanly valued and recognized “proof” (evidence) about the sacredness and truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. Why would God thus do exactly what He said through the Apostle Paul should not be looked for? We are talking about the most intelligent Being in the universe, of course. Any school teacher could see that devising a test for “students” that involves figuring out whom one can trust intimately with absolutely no question of their values, motives, intents, desires, and future path, would mean devising a test does not provide obvious answers especially when the test is about how much faith a person is willing to show in their belief in Christ.

That being said, one such as yourself with your clear objections to the kind of faith required to read the Book of Mormon with an open and sensitive heart, has your answer already, and it is that you have what you want and God gave it to you–a completely reasonable approach to not even seriously considering the subject. That is step one of the “test”.

As to artifacts, I have been told there were artifacts around upstate New York involving Ancient Americans (Indians), but I haven’t seen any myself nor do I care about whether there were or weren’t.

Following a prophet is always a question of the faith of the person doing the hearing.

As to what a hill is “named”, I hope you’re not really asking if the Nephites could have named another hill somewhere else a name such as Cumorah. Surely you’re not thinking that just because there is a “Hill Cumorah” in upstate New York, there can’t be another hill that a group of people named “Cumorah” in their lingo. Do you know how many U.S. cities have exactly the same name, but are in different states? Do you realize that a U.S. city can have the same name as a city in England? 'Same goes for hills.

The “supreme will” idea may seem reasonable to you, but the Bible already gives humankind God’s “supreme will”. The Book of Mormon has a different purpose than that, so if that is all one wants, then they have what they want in the Bible and should read it.

A resurrected being such as Moroni could certainly move about in the world with heavenly speed, and carry something with them if there is a divine purpose for that.

As to the words “escaped into the south countries”, you will notice the plural of “countries” rather than a singular “country”. It may or may not mean all places south–it may mean there was an understood geographical separation between the “north countries” and the “south countries”.

I honestly suggest that one such as yourself is wasting time even thinking about the Book of Mormon. It does not match the intent of your heart, so it would seem wiser to go with what is going to bring you personal meaning in your own life, and follow Christ in the way that makes sense to you. I think there would be too large of a set of challenges to overcome were you to gain a serious interest in the Book of Mormon. That does not mean anything about your own faith or serious desire to follow God’s will. It just means you already have what you sincerely want, evidently, and if you study the Bible and live its teachings that will lead you to much peace and joy in your life.
 
Zach Dunn,
First of all, I might as well get to a direct point that is central to this whole set of questions. You asked why “didn’t God want everyone to see them.” For anyone to think that an infinitely intelligent Person would not have a testing process that was not merely, “let’s see if you will obey Me if I give you every possible evidence that you could want and then see if you will obey My will” seems amazing to me (sorry if that fits anyone). (No, I’m not speaking for God–I am merely saying in mortal words that God would have higher plans in His plan than such an obviously wrong concept of testing as that.)

Here we read all through the epistles in the New Testament that God wants humankind to have spiritual knowledge, and does not want that knowledge to have come the same way as mortal wisdom of man comes–yet why would one then believe that God makes an about-face and provides humanly devised and humanly valued and recognized “proof” (evidence) about the sacredness and truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. Why would God thus do exactly what He said through the Apostle Paul should not be looked for? We are talking about the most intelligent Being in the universe, of course. Any school teacher could see that devising a test for “students” that involves figuring out whom one can trust intimately with absolutely no question of their values, motives, intents, desires, and future path, would mean devising a test does not provide obvious answers especially when the test is about how much faith a person is willing to show in their belief in Christ.
Ok, here is the problem I have in even simpler terms: I don’t understand why God would inspire the writings of the Old and New Testaments available to all in their inspired format, but not the golden plates of the Book of Mormon. Now, before you can say anything, I know we do not have access to the original manuscripts of the Bible as of today, but that is a whole different issue considering God did not purposefully take away the original Bible manuscripts, they just passed away with time. I personally find the whole “testing us” bit to be ridiculous. God has always made His salutary revelation known to man, He has not shown it to one man and then taken it all away.
That being said, one such as yourself with your clear objections to the kind of faith required to read the Book of Mormon with an open and sensitive heart, has your answer already, and it is that you have what you want and God gave it to you–a completely reasonable approach to not even seriously considering the subject. That is step one of the “test”.
So God is “testing” me by not giving me “the kind of faith required to read the Book of Mormon with an open and sensitive heart”? That doesn’t make much sense to me.
As to artifacts, I have been told there were artifacts around upstate New York involving Ancient Americans (Indians), but I haven’t seen any myself nor do I care about whether there were or weren’t.
So you have no interest in validating your own religion and beliefs?
Following a prophet is always a question of the faith of the person doing the hearing.
While this is true, God has always provided sufficient reason to believe actual prophets were actual prophets.
As to what a hill is “named”, I hope you’re not really asking if the Nephites could have named another hill somewhere else a name such as Cumorah. Surely you’re not thinking that just because there is a “Hill Cumorah” in upstate New York, there can’t be another hill that a group of people named “Cumorah” in their lingo. Do you know how many U.S. cities have exactly the same name, but are in different states? Do you realize that a U.S. city can have the same name as a city in England? 'Same goes for hills.
I guess you could say I came at this point from the perspective of someone who believes Joseph Smith to be a false prophet. I simply don’t think that it’s a coincidence that Smith found the plates at Cumorah and that the place where the great battle occurred was also called Cumorah.

← continued in next post →
 
← continued from previous post →
The “supreme will” idea may seem reasonable to you, but the Bible already gives humankind God’s “supreme will”. The Book of Mormon has a different purpose than that, so if that is all one wants, then they have what they want in the Bible and should read it.
So are you saying the Book of Mormon is not superior to the Bible?
A resurrected being such as Moroni could certainly move about in the world with heavenly speed, and carry something with them if there is a divine purpose for that.
Where do you get your theology on resurrected bodies?
As to the words “escaped into the south countries”, you will notice the plural of “countries” rather than a singular “country”. It may or may not mean all places south–it may mean there was an understood geographical separation between the “north countries” and the “south countries”.
So what if there was? How does that make it seem likely that this event did not occur near upstate New York?
I honestly suggest that one such as yourself is wasting time even thinking about the Book of Mormon. It does not match the intent of your heart, so it would seem wiser to go with what is going to bring you personal meaning in your own life, and follow Christ in the way that makes sense to you. I think there would be too large of a set of challenges to overcome were you to gain a serious interest in the Book of Mormon. That does not mean anything about your own faith or serious desire to follow God’s will. It just means you already have what you sincerely want, evidently, and if you study the Bible and live its teachings that will lead you to much peace and joy in your life.
Not to be mean or anything, but this sort of relativism bothers me to no end. If you truly believe that only practicing the Mormon religion can get me to the highest heaven to be with the Father and be exalted, why do you make up excuses instead of defenses? Do you not want me to be exalted? Is there not enough space in that heaven for me? Sorry I got on a little rant here, but the whole, “you do what’s right for you and you’ll be fine” is just a bunch of c r a p to me.
 
← continued from previous post →

So are you saying the Book of Mormon is not superior to the Bible?

Where do you get your theology on resurrected bodies?

So what if there was? How does that make it seem likely that this event did not occur near upstate New York?

Not to be mean or anything, but this sort of relativism bothers me to no end. If you truly believe that only practicing the Mormon religion can get me to the highest heaven to be with the Father and be exalted, why do you make up excuses instead of defenses? Do you not want me to be exalted? Is there not enough space in that heaven for me? Sorry I got on a little rant here, but the whole, “you do what’s right for you and you’ll be fine” is just a bunch of … to me.
Zach,
The Book of Mormon is not “superior” to the Bible–it provides a second witness of Jesus Christ and that God calls prophets to lead people to Christ, and that the Holy Ghost provides revelation to individuals who sincerely pray to know truth.

Moroni appeared to Joseph Smith as a resurrected personage, and did it by coming into his room suddenly, at an instant, and left the room also in an instant without going out through the door.

There is no geographical dividing point or line that would make a reference to the “south countries” seem logical from upstate New York.

What I meant by the last paragraph is that if you have what you want in the Bible (which teaches essential truths to live by), and you don’t want additional truths than what are taught in the Bible such as what Paul wrote about in 1 Corinthians 2 and what John wrote about in the Book of Revelation, then why should I feel any interest in teaching you something you don’t want to know? Why should I do differently than what God does, which is teach only those who are desirous to learn in the way He has revealed such knowledge is to be learned?

If you don’t want to know it by the process of getting revealed knowledge as Paul wrote about and by earnestly seeking such knowledge with a sincere heart, then the Bible gives one such as yourself enough knowledge to live a good life. A path toward exaltation absolutely requires being amenable to gaining revealed knowledge. This is an important, vital purpose for the Holy Spirit–gaining revealed knowledge. That is a major part of “the test”. The space in heaven is not the issue–the desires of a person’s heart, their faith, their willingness to become changed and really be sanctified and become holy through Christ’s grace, including doing what the scriptures teach such as loving God with all one’s heart, receiving marriage as a gift from God to men and women as an eternal gift, is the issue. God will not force a person to go “where they don’t want to go.”

Exaltation is for people who don’t go looking for self-justification and who find in the Bible a revelation that God has more knowledge to reveal than what is written on those pages, wonderful though that blessed word of God is.
 
Hi, JMJ4,
The problem is that there is no way of knowing where those battles took place, so archeologists would not have any idea where to excavate.
Hi ParkerD -

Have you ever been to Gettysburg?
 
Hi ParkerD -

Have you ever been to Gettysburg?
Hi, JMJ4,
Yes, I have in 1976. I felt a reverence in being there. I have always loved Lincoln’s Gettysburg address, and been grateful for his eloquence as well as his tender feelings for those who had served their country.
 
Hi, JMJ4,
Yes, I have in 1976. I felt a reverence in being there. I have always loved Lincoln’s Gettysburg address, and been grateful for his eloquence as well as his tender feelings for those who had served their country.
ParkerD- I wasn’t referring to the way one would feel while being there (actually, I was very distressed at the loss of human life and didn’t enjoy the tour of the battlefield at all).

The point is, there was a great deal of evidence from the battle in a very large area.

That is why I asked if you have ever been to Gettysburg.
 
Hi, JMJ4,
The problem is that there is no way of knowing where those battles took place, so archeologists would not have any idea where to excavate.
ParkerD - Why do Mormons go to Palmyra every summer?

Isn’t this location of great significance to the faithful?
 
ParkerD- I wasn’t referring to the way one would feel while being there (actually, I was very distressed at the loss of human life and didn’t enjoy the tour of the battlefield at all).

The point is, there was a great deal of evidence from the battle in a very large area.

That is why I asked if you have ever been to Gettysburg.
JMJ4,
So are you saying that if Gettysburg had not been made a national landmark with efforts to preserve the “evidence”, and if complete freedom of entry and freedom to remove whatever one wanted to remove and freedom to farm the land and cut the trees and do what men do with private property, that in another 1,500 years from right now there would be substantial, reliable and conclusive “evidence” that Gettysburg was a major battlefield from the Civil War?
 
ParkerD - Why do Mormons go to Palmyra every summer?

Isn’t this location of great significance to the faithful?
Palmyra, NY is where Joseph Smith is said to have had the “First Vision”, and where the Book of Mormon is said to have been found, in the Hill Cumorah.
 
JMJ4,
So are you saying that if Gettysburg had not been made a national landmark with efforts to preserve the “evidence”, and if complete freedom of entry and freedom to remove whatever one wanted to remove and freedom to farm the land and cut the trees and do what men do with private property, that in another 1,500 years from right now there would be substantial, reliable and conclusive “evidence” that Gettysburg was a major battlefield from the Civil War?
ParkerD- Yes, there would still be evidence. Please ParkerD, go on to the website of Biblical Archaeological Review, as I’ve mentioned before, and you would not even think about pursuing this argument.
Artifacts have survived for thousand of years, and no, they have not made Israel a national landmark. Not now, not in the past. People have come along and tromped all over everything, built new things on top of ancient civilizations, etc. Why would people take the time to carefully remove bones, pottery, walls, etc before building new?

Why? Because the artifacts were irrelevant to them and people did not look at artifacts as having value. They would have no way of knowing that SOMEDAY these items would be so important to telling the story of ancient civilizations. If so, they would have pilfered and sold those items as you claim happened to the artifacts relating to the BoM.

What value would the remains of all of the great battles in the BoM have and to whom? You claim people have pilfered, and sold the artificacts. Sold to who? Who had the foresight to know someday these artificacts would have a value? Obviously, things only sell if there is a demand and therefore a value. Besides, if there was such a demand for these items they would have been passed on to heirs or would have been sold to museums.

It is unthinkable to believe for one minute that God would preserve early churches and civilizations of the Old and New Testaments, and quite possibly the burial cloth of Jesus Christ himself (see Shroud.com) then turn around and not leave a shred of evidence about battles, peoples, civilizations, that are supposedly the fulfillment of His Word in the BoM.

History has always told its story through artifacts along with the written and oral word. ALWAYS. Except for the Book of Mormon.
 
When I was part of the Hill Cumorah pageant back in the 80’s there were a few visitors sites people could visit. The Hill Cumorah itself, the Smith farm where the “Sacred Grove” is believed to be, the Whitmere Farm (where they officially organized the LDS church), the building where the first BoM was printed, etc.
 
When I was part of the Hill Cumorah pageant back in the 80’s there were a few visitors sites people could visit. The Hill Cumorah itself, the Smith farm where the “Sacred Grove” is believed to be, the Whitmere Farm (where they officially organized the LDS church), the building where the first BoM was printed, etc.
Thanks for info!
I was wondering if there were museums with any artifacts from the BoM, not just visitor’s centers (or maybe the visitor’s centers have museums in them?)
 
Thanks for info!
I was wondering if there were museums with any artifacts from the BoM, not just visitor’s centers (or maybe the visitor’s centers have museums in them?)
There wasnt back then. Don’t know about now. Dont know if the Grandin Building (where the BoM was first published) still has the original printing press? Guess that is about as close to an artifact that you will find.

Have there been any ancient artifacts that support the claims of the BoM and the time period it is about? Not that I know of.
 
When I was part of the Hill Cumorah pageant back in the 80’s there were a few visitors sites people could visit. The Hill Cumorah itself, the Smith farm where the “Sacred Grove” is believed to be, the Whitmere Farm (where they officially organized the LDS church), the building where the first BoM was printed, etc.
Marie - What is the Hill Cumorah Pageant?
 
Marie - What is the Hill Cumorah Pageant?
It’s a big outdoor theatrical play putting on by the LDS church at the Hill Cumorah. It’s held each July.

It re-enacts various stories from the BoM and of the time when JSmith had his so-called vision etc etc.

It’s quite a production with over 700 cast members. Very spectacular in scope. 🙂
 
What about those 10,000 troops that Moroni, according to BoM, lead into battle against the Lamanites and lost.

How come there is no evidence of such a large battle?

This doesnt sound like some some tiny group (and these were just the warriors right? Not the women and children?)
Where are all the artifacts from the great battles that took place in Europe? Just dust in the wind. We need to remember that archeaology has found weapons of war in south and central america, And I do believe that Mel Gibson’s movie the Apocalypse portrays quite well lamanite life, without him even knowing it.

images.google.fi/imgres?imgurl=http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc268/SenatorJeffSmith/apocalypto.jpg&imgrefurl=http://cinemapedant.blogspot.com/2008/03/apocalypto.html&usg=__CBqyvzTrOOqxeV-oST_2qNOo_MQ=&h=450&w=405&sz=49&hl=fi&start=5&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=WrWoIwq3jeR0xM:&tbnh=127&tbnw=114&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dapocalypse%2Bmel%2Bgibson%26hl%3Dfi%26rlz%3D1R2SKPB_fiFI353%26sa%3DX%26um%3D1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top