G
guanophore
Guest
Scripture is a matter of record, along with the Sacred Tradition, but how people perceive that record becomes part of it. For example, if the Apostles baptized infants, and Scripture says whole households were baptized, and the Sacred Tradition affirms this includes infants, the Scripture will be understood differently than those who do not embrace the Sacred Tradition. They will perceive “believers baptism” from the pages.i think the matter of record is scripture itself. How one perceives scripture is something different
Doctrine is rooted in Scripture, certainly, but obviously there is insufficient scripture for “proof” in many cases. For example, Catholics believe that “God hates divorce” and that once God has joined two people together, no man should separate them. But other denominations perceive this differently, or absolve themselves of following this commandment. So again, we are left with perceptions, even though we are both using the same inerrant and inspired documents.NT is partly for setting record straight, and therefore has proof texts for any particular truth.
It is understandable that persons who have rejected the Sacred Tradition would be left in a state of being “just not sure”. This is why the Scriptures were never meant to be separated from the sacred Tradition that produced them.Yes just not sure apostles taught assumption, and other traditions.