I disagree. I know the position of the Church, but during my studies of Jewish culture and of Islam, I find that there are 99 “names” of Allah, which are more attributes. Ar-Raḥmān, “the compassionate”, Ar-Raḥīm, “the merciful”, etc.
In Judaism, things are quite different. A name is not merely an arbitrary designation, a random combination of sounds. The name conveys the nature and essence of the thing named. It represents the history and reputation of the being named.
This is not as strange or unfamiliar a concept as it may seem at first glance. In English, we often refer to reputation as his “good name.” When a company is sold, one thing that may be sold is the company’s “good will,” that is, the right to use the company’s name. The Hebrew concept of a name is very similar to these ideas.
The primary Hebrew name for God follows this example, “YHWH”, (I am, to be), , the similar Ehyeh-Asher-Ehyeh (I am that I am).
Nearly all other names or “attributes” of God are used in place of these holy names, as writing, or even speaking them are forbidden, to protect them from defamation. See “Adonai” (Lord), “Ha Shem” (the name), “Adoshem” (a combination of the two), etc.
There is also a very different relationship between man and God in both. That, and the several descriptions of Allah as a “schemer” of “decieving” in the Quran lead me to believe them to be entirely different. It may be that Muhammed borrowed what he knew about Judaism and Christianity to Islam, and the Arab culture then gave it a very different bent.