D
dan1el
Guest
Islam’s roots are in Middleastern mythology and idolatry, mixed together with some Christian faith, the same way Catholicism is born out of Paganism and a little of Christian doctrine.
What makes you so sure Catholicism was born out of paganism and a “little of Christian doctrine”? What’s your religious affiliation?Islam’s roots are in Middleastern mythology and idolatry, mixed together with some Christian faith, the same way Catholicism is born out of Paganism and a little of Christian doctrine.
You have no idea what you’re talking about.Islam’s roots are in Middleastern mythology and idolatry, mixed together with some Christian faith, the same way Catholicism is born out of Paganism and a little of Christian doctrine.
Reminds me of when the Jews said,You have no idea what you’re talking about.
The Catholic Church was founded in 33 A.D. by Christ and the Apostles. It is the sole Church which is called “the pillar and foundation of truth” by St. Paul, and Saint Peter is the Rock on which the Church is built according to Jesus. Saint Peter was the first universal bishop, the Bishop of Rome. Christ also said that the gates of Hell would not prevail against the Catholic Church, in the Gospel of Matthew.
In the 300’s, the Church defined the Doctrine of the Trinity, and condemned the Arianism, which denied Christ’s divinity.
The Church also defined the Canon of holy Scripture around this time.
What evidence do you have that Christ was wrong when He said the gates of Hell would not prevail against the Catholic Church and that it was corrupted by Paganism? None!
Your charge on the Catholic Church is not only lame but has been brought up several times in the past and debunked. Protestants like yourself have even grown tired of making such blatant accusations because they know the answer to their questions already. They do not necessarily have to rely on the Catholic apologist; but if they actually READ the Bible WITHOUT dissecting sections of it as though they were some “biblical scholar/surgeon”, they will come to know the Truth.Not to condemn the church, but…
People have been killed in the name of the church : was this in obedience to Jesus’ command to turn the other cheek, and resist not being done evil? Yet the church approved it, whereas Jesus said the furthest you could go was to treat such a one as a tax-collector. I do not say this to bring charges against the church, but to show that if Peter himself had to be corrected for his error in Galatians 2:11, how much more his children? (As you call him your father?)
“Whoever says they are without sin lies and makes God into a liar.” 1 John
If you say the church is without error, it isn’t true, as history has shown us.
Anti-semitism was rampant on part of the church, despite Scripture stating that the Jewish people could not be replaced as the chosen people of God, and would one day return to God at the end of this age Romans 11:1-26.
Nonetheless, every individual who believes into Jesus Christ is a new Creation in Him - precious - and has the grace to become a Son of God, and I love you; we are part of the same Body, Jesus, but I the false doctrines/beliefs that short-circuit the flow of God’s grace, and disable you from the freedom in Christ’s truth.
No. I have full faith in the Magisterium. Read Matthew 16:17-19 and you will know why i said that.The singular point I am making is that Catholic Dogma is not 100% correct; would you agree with this?
Oh, I guess they were right in the Crusades, right?No. I have full faith in the Magisterium. Read Matthew 16:17-19 and you will know why i said that.
Please. What is Protestant Europe doing then? Evangelizing the people of King’s Street? Don’t blame Catholicism when Protestant Europeans themselves are falling behind.You can’t argue with the fact that through Catholicism, Europe has become the center of humanism for the world - and that it is because they lack the power and evidence of faith.
“Show me your faith by your words, and I will show you my faith by my works.”
The Crusades wasn’t about occupying Jerusalem. Where did you get that info from? The Turks? In any case, the Crusaders would have gotten back Jerusalem from the Muslim invaders had the Reformation not taken place. The Middle East would not be what it is today if Luther co-operated and apologized for his heretical teachings.Oh, I guess they were right in the Crusades, right?
“Thou shalt kill unbelievers and wage war to occupy Jerusalem” one of the beatittudes, right?
Oh, wait, Jesus said something to the contrary, right? Right.
You side-stepped the point that the church made an ERROR in commanding people to be killed - in the name of God. What are you afraid of? Why are you not able to admit fault? You’re not in heaven yet; when Jesus returns, He will destroy all error, and then you will be perfect; until then… you make errors!The Crusades wasn’t about occupying Jerusalem. Where did you get that info from? The Turks? In any case, the Crusaders would have gotten back Jerusalem from the Muslim invaders had the Reformation not taken place. The Middle East would not be what it is today if Luther co-operated and apologized for his heretical teachings.
How would you have responded to 300 years of Islamic expansionism? Mistakes were certainly made, but the primary goal of most of the Crusades was to keep it from falling into the Islamic sphere.You side-stepped the point that the church made an ERROR in commanding people to be killed - in the name of God. What are you afraid of? Why are you not able to admit fault? You’re not in heaven yet; when Jesus returns, He will destroy all error, and then you will be perfect; until then… you make errors!
That is the very reason why the Scriptures strongly discourages private interpretation. You make no sense of it and just make ad hominem rants by quoting random verses you think is applicable to your view. And believe me, i have not only tested but also tasted Protestantism - grape juice and crackers and it wasn’t my cup of tea. Not to mention the endless rantings of yabadabadoo when they do not even take speaking in tongues seriously.In your mind, you see “Catholicism and Protestantism” whereas I just judge things by the Scriptures, as I have been commanded to do in 1 Th 5:21 and 1 john, when he said, “Test the spirits”. And I’ve tested the spirit which would desire to cover the truth, and found it to be false. I do the same with false “protestant” foolishness, too, but it is no more foolish than Catholic foolery, and my own foolishness is not any better.
There is no excuse; they disobeyed the commandments of Jesus to their own ends, meaning, their faith wasn’t towards God, but towards themselves, because the words they believed were not of God, but of themselves.How would you have responded to 300 years of Islamic expansionism? Mistakes were certainly made, but the primary goal of most of the Crusades was to keep it from falling into the Islamic sphere.
It’s Islamic to this day.
lol yeah, like I said, there are many things they do which are not consistent with the things taught in Scripture, just as you do.That is the very reason why the Scriptures strongly discourages private interpretation. You make no sense of it and just make ad hominem rants by quoting random verses you think is applicable to your view. And believe me, i have not only tested but also tasted Protestantism - grape juice and crackers and it wasn’t my cup of tea. Not to mention the endless rantings of yabadabadoo when they do not even take speaking in tongues seriously.
You can call yourself whatever you want - if you are outside the Church, you are a Protestant and will always be one.