M
meltzerboy2
Guest
I don’t think it even matters what religion you are a part of, let alone which denomination.
- Status
L
lanman87
Guest
I wasn’t quoting. I was taking the overall theme of your position.
- The Catholic Church is infalliable in doctrine
- The Catholic Church alone has the authority to interpret scripture and declare what is apostolic teaching/traditions.
L
lanman87
Guest
Wow, I hope you have a great night sleep and don’t have to work late on a Friday night that often. I’ve been there and done that and it isn’t fun.
S
steve-b
Guest
consider "Catholic" | Catholic Answerslanman87:
Exactly the reason I smile when I see a post stating.
Additionally. Many on here need to understand the difference between capital C as in the Catholic Church and small c as on what we all are! The UNIVERSAL church!
- This is very Catholic
- Accodring to history… (yes all have access to that)
- This is a new invention…
- According to the Apostles…
- And all its derivatives…
S
steve-b
Guest
To your question
If true, and there is no argument against those councils by “mainliners” then picking just one issue,
Why do all Protestants regardless of “line” have 66 canonical books in their bibles instead of 73?
S
steve-b
Guest
To your questions
For definition of heresies in history The Great Heresies | Catholic Answers
S
steve-b
Guest
how would YOU interpret THE links I posted then?
While that comment was to Matthew, All I can say re: the part to me, I take seriously the consequences mentioned in scripture and the 2000 yr history of the Church that condemn division… That said, I’m not the one to judge you or anyone at death. The scriptures and Church tradition quoted, condemns division. Therefore, who am I to disagree.
Last edited:
M
MichaelP3
Guest
Ask St Jerome? Or Cardinal Cejetan (sic) wondered.
Just a thought considering you thought you were trying to make a point!
Just a thought considering you thought you were trying to make a point!
S
steve-b
Guest
Our difference is, I give quotes to the point, properly referenced.
M
MichaelP3
Guest
Our difference is A LOT MORE!.
S
steve-b
Guest
And here, I thought you were going to give quotes from those you mentioned, properly referenced of coursesteve-b:
Our difference is A LOT MORE!.
Last edited:
M
MichaelP3
Guest
Property referenced quotes are your domain Mr Steve!
I stick to the world we live in
I stick to the world we live in
S
steve-b
Guest
Property referenced quotes are your domain Mr Steve!
I stick to the world we live in
ok, ok, joking aside,
When you responded with
That begs you provide quotes from them to make your point / question…true?
Last edited:
M
MichaelP3
Guest
I can quote them. But I believe you should have seen this before. It is common knowledge they did conform to this. They wondered as I do. And as you should!
M
MichaelP3
Guest
Still. Why do those “Protestants” reject those council’s.
Hint. They actually do not!
Hint. They actually do not!
M
MichaelP3
Guest
Wondered about what and what debate?
M
MichaelP3
Guest
From me I would just say check the history!
Regards!
Regards!
S
steve-b
Guest
As in they (Jerome, & Cajetan) conformed to the Church on those 7 books. They no longer wondered.
S
steve-b
Guest
Historically speaking,
- Council of Rome a.d. 382 (local council) decree of Pope Damasus I, he names by books, 73 in total as the canon
- Council of Hippo a.d. 393 (local council)
- councils of Carthage a.d. 397, 419 (local councils)
- Council of Florence a.d. 1431 ecumenical
- Council of Trent a.d. 1545 ecumenical
Last edited:
S
steve-b
Guest
then to pick one point, why do they only have 66 canonical books in their bibles?
- Status