Does purgatory really exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tiggylou
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hmmm? Matt 5:26. Does it not mean to make amends while we are on this earth–pay the last farthing while you can?
Yes, that interpretation is also legitimate - that’s why I used the word “often” instead of “always” in my original answer.
I thought Latin “purgatory” was described more as a cleansing of temporal venial sins–the backwash so to say. 😃
That’s how I understand it as well.

Blessings,
Marduk
 
What my point is There is no way that you could be in hell (eternal separation from God and see the kingdom of heaven) If the Rich man was in hell there is no communication with the righteous. TOTAL SEPARATION. He was in torment, temporary torment. Had to be. Purgatory is for people who have un -repented sins. If you have repented your sins, and had none, why would you have to have the final cleansing? What is being pure and clean. Means you have asked for forgiveness for your sins, repented and are cleansed from them. No need for purgatory then. I agree with the one Post the Blessed Mother is all I can see who was sinless and got the free pass. I am not saying others did not but she is the only one I could say for sure. But my point is there is no way someone in hell could ever see Abraham.
I’m thinking your interpretation causes Scripture to contradict itself. You are saying that the image of the Rich Man talking to Abraham means that the Rich Man will somehow cross over at some later “time.” However, the parable definitely states that the gulf between the Rich Man and Abraham is UNBRIDGEABLE. Either Scripture is wrong, or you are mistaken in your interpretation of the parable as a reference to Purgatory.

On the other hand, I’ve have read Catholic apologists use the parable ONLY to demonstrate that there exists a state or “place” in the afterlife that is not Heaven or Hell. I’ve never read of any Catholic apologist (aside from you) that would actually use the parable as evidence for Purgatory itself - at best it alludes to the existence of a state that is not eternal bliss or eternal damnation.

The Eastern and Oriental Traditions would say, as brother Mickey indicated, that the Rich Man is experiencing a foretaste of his Final Judgment.

Blessings,
Marduk
 
I’m thinking your interpretation causes Scripture to contradict itself. You are saying that the image of the Rich Man talking to Abraham means that the Rich Man will somehow cross over at some later “time.” However, the parable definitely states that the gulf between the Rich Man and Abraham is UNBRIDGEABLE. Either Scripture is wrong, or you are mistaken in your interpretation of the parable as a reference to Purgatory.

On the other hand, I’ve have read Catholic apologists use the parable ONLY to demonstrate that there exists a state or “place” in the afterlife that is not Heaven or Hell. I’ve never read of any Catholic apologist (aside from you) that would actually use the parable as evidence for Purgatory itself - at best it alludes to the existence of a state that is not eternal bliss or eternal damnation.

The Eastern and Oriental Traditions would say, as brother Mickey indicated, that the Rich Man is experiencing a foretaste of his Final Judgment.

Blessings,
Marduk
What my point is that this place could not have been hell, and it could not have been heaven. IT was a temporal hell, But I was taught the only way God will not forgive you for a sin isr to not stop that sin, and not be truely sorry, and secondly reject God all of your life, and forever. In this world we go to confession, and repent. Now The CCC that Mickey was talking about was talking about angels. They were angels that lived in the dark and rejected Jesus forever. The devil is on example. He could never get into heaven, he is against God has been from the get go, and thats that. But I was never told that anyone that dies in the state of venial sin cannot go to heaven, Mortal sin is what the CCC was talking about. I was told that when we meet God we are judged. Then and there. Yes if we are in mortal sin, we will not get to purgatory. But think about it nothing unclean can enter heaven, IF we go through this final process it is a final cleansing and that final cleansing is purgatory. Now the rich man did not die in mortal sin, mortal sin is knowingly sin against God. The rich man did not understand that, if he did why did he want to come back and tell his brothers. Now purgatory is the final place to clean you, now what are we being cleaned of if not our final sins that God forgave us for. Just like confession, when we confess the priest says you are forgiven. He does not say repent and come back. He forgives us and then we repent. Mortal sin is alot different then venial sin. We cannot live all of our lives rejecting God and then at the last minute say its okay If there is a God I will confess and repent in the next world. No, we must live our lives in belief, and do our best to follow the ten commandments. But that is why the final cleansing is needed because of venial sin, and that final cleansing to me has to be a final place for sins that were not repented in this world. Because if we die completely cleansed that would me no sin at all correct. Because is not the final place cleaning us from our final sins, if not what is making us unclean? I always was told sin is what makes us unclean.
 
Also unbridgible means can’t get across. But total separation means cannot see at all. If you and I are totally separated we cannot see eachother at all. But if you are on one side and I on another that is no bridge. but we could see eachother. But can love not build a bridge, can prayers not build a bridge. Because everytime I say this Mickey jumped on me, so maybe you can understand what I am saying. We are taught to pray for the dead, the souls in purgatory. If there is only heaven or hell, what good could those prayers do for those people. Because in hell, you cannot be prayed out of. And in heaven you have already found final happiness. See what I mean. There has to be a middle place, that is where the rich man had to be. He was not in heaven though, but he was sorry for what he had done. Now how could he see Abraham in hell, he could not. Abraham would not be totally separated from God. But I am not saying you cannot pray for people ever. I am saying you can pray for the living and the dead, and that is proof why.
 
Also unbridgible means can’t get across. But total separation means cannot see at all. If you and I are totally separated we cannot see eachother at all. But if you are on one side and I on another that is no bridge. but we could see eachother. But can love not build a bridge, can prayers not build a bridge. Because everytime I say this Mickey jumped on me, so maybe you can understand what I am saying. We are taught to pray for the dead, the souls in purgatory. If there is only heaven or hell, what good could those prayers do for those people. Because in hell, you cannot be prayed out of. And in heaven you have already found final happiness. See what I mean. There has to be a middle place, that is where the rich man had to be. He was not in heaven though, but he was sorry for what he had done. Now how could he see Abraham in hell, he could not. Abraham would not be totally separated from God. But I am not saying you cannot pray for people ever. I am saying you can pray for the living and the dead, and that is proof why.
I’m not sure I agree with you regarding the issue of “unbridgeable.” I think we can agree to disagree on that (since it’s not one of the several verses that the Catholic Church has officially pronounced on).

I do have a question on your statement regarding the ability to repent after death. I am with brother Mickey on the matter. I do not believe repentance can occur after death. I think it’s possible that forgiveness can occur after death, but repentance cannot. Can you explain your position a bit more?

Blessings,
Marduk
 
If you don’t mind me adding my two cents, I don’t think Luke 16 is the strongest text to show purgatory, but I don’t think it can be ruled out.
I’m not sure I agree with you regarding the issue of “unbridgeable.” I think we can agree to disagree on that (since it’s not one of the several verses that the Catholic Church has officially pronounced on).

I do have a question on your statement regarding the ability to repent after death. I am with brother Mickey on the matter. I do not believe repentance can occur after death. I think it’s possible that forgiveness can occur after death, but repentance cannot. Can you explain your position a bit more?

Blessings,
Marduk
I agree with you on the non-ability to repent after death. I also think forgiveness can occur after death via (Mt 12:32).

As far as the unbridgeabele chasm, I’m only speculating. We say that Christ descended into “hell” in the Apostles Creed. I don’t know if He visit both sides of the chasm, and for what purpose.

Could the flames the rich man is suffering be those of (1 Cor 3:15)?

Is it possible that he is recieving the light beating of (Lk 12:48)?

If all those on the rich man’s side of the chasm are destined to eternal damnation, do they still recieve some of God’s grace until the final judgment? (The reason I ask this question is because the rich man still shows the grace of concern for his brothers).

I really don’t know the answer to these questions. It appears that the rich man is destined to hell, but I think it is plausible that the rich man is in purgatory. He may not be able to cross over to the Bosom of Abraham, but when Hades gives up it’s dead (Rev 20:13) is it possible that his name is found in the book of life?
 
I’m not sure I agree with you regarding the issue of “unbridgeable.” I think we can agree to disagree on that (since it’s not one of the several verses that the Catholic Church has officially pronounced on).

I do have a question on your statement regarding the ability to repent after death. I am with brother Mickey on the matter. I do not believe repentance can occur after death. I think it’s possible that forgiveness can occur after death, but repentance cannot. Can you explain your position a bit more?

Blessings,
Marduk
Okay lets look at this another way, Do you believe that if some dies and have sin, but do not have grave sin if they can get into heaven? Lets start there.
 
I found this the other day on Roman Catholic theology.

It may do a better job then I.

Roman Catholics make a distinction between Mortal sin and venial sin. Mortal sin is grave violation of Gods law. Venial sin is forgivable sin, does not set us in direct opposition ot the will and friendship of God.

RC believes a pardon of sins and purification can occur during life. For example Baptism and Penance. However if purification is not achieved in life VENIAL sins can still be purified after death. The speciifc name given to this purification after death is purgatory.

Now again that is what I was taught. Now if in my own ignorance I have explained something totally different I apologize. But I see confession the same way, purification and I see purification as repenting. If I am mistaken I need to be corrected. Because I should not mislead anyone in my faith, including myself.

So if someone out there can explain this better, and show me where I have failed to understand, help me to. That is what we are here to help eachother. Again if I am going against the teaching of the RCC show me. And if I am wrong, I will admit my blindness and ask God to forgive me and move on. 👍
 
I found this the other day on Roman Catholic theology.

It may do a better job then I.

Roman Catholics make a distinction between Mortal sin and venial sin. Mortal sin is grave violation of Gods law. Venial sin is forgivable sin, does not set us in direct opposition ot the will and friendship of God.

RC believes a pardon of sins and purification can occur during life. For example Baptism and Penance. However if purification is not achieved in life VENIAL sins can still be purified after death. The speciifc name given to this purification after death is purgatory.

Now again that is what I was taught. Now if in my own ignorance I have explained something totally different I apologize. But I see confession the same way, purification and I see purification as repenting. If I am mistaken I need to be corrected. Because I should not mislead anyone in my faith, including myself.

So if someone out there can explain this better, and show me where I have failed to understand, help me to. That is what we are here to help eachother. Again if I am going against the teaching of the RCC show me. And if I am wrong, I will admit my blindness and ask God to forgive me and move on. 👍
Venial sin by definition can be forgiven after death. Not so with mortal sin.
 
Now The CCC that Mickey was talking about was talking about angels.
It is talking about fallen angels AND man’s inability to repent after death. It is really quite simple and staight forward.
Now the rich man did not die in mortal sin
You had better talk to your priest about this parable. With all due respect, you seem to have a gross misunderstanding about it.
 
(The reason I ask this question is because the rich man still shows the grace of concern for his brothers).
I do not see this a s grace. How do you figure this is grace? The rich man wants to prevent his brothers from making the same devastating error that he had made–but to no avail. Here is something to think about in this parable. The rich man’s sins were so grievous, that he is not even given a name! He is known as “the rich man”
 
I do not see this a s grace. How do you figure this is grace? The rich man wants to prevent his brothers from making the same devastating error that he had made–but to no avail. Here is something to think about in this parable. The rich man’s sins were so grievous, that he is not even given a name! He is known as “the rich man”
Mickey, Do you understand what a parable is?
 
I do not see this a s grace. How do you figure this is grace? The rich man wants to prevent his brothers from making the same devastating error that he had made–but to no avail.
My thinking is that mortal sin destroys charity in the heart of man (CCC1855) In otherwords, with out God’s grace his heart would be so hardened he couldn’t be concerned that way. I could be wrong.
Here is something to think about in this parable. The rich man’s sins were so grievous, that he is not even given a name! He is known as “the rich man”
NAB footnote: The oldest Greek manuscript of Luke dating from ca. A.D. 175-225 records the name of the rich man as an abbreviated form of “Nineveh,” but there is very little textual support in other manuscripts for this reading. “Dives” of popular tradition is the Latin Vulgate’s translation for “rich man.”
 
Mickey do you think there is a big difference of going thru the process of cleansing us of our sins and the repenting of our sins? If so what would it mean to you?
 
Mickey do you think there is a big difference of going thru the process of cleansing us of our sins and the repenting of our sins? If so what would it mean to you?
You are not clear here. I am a firm believer in continuous repentance while we are on this Earth–but I do not believe in purgatory.
 
Okay then, remember its not who the people Jesus is talking about that is important its what Jesus is telling us. Our lesson.
There is great meaning to the fact that the rich man does not have a name. Ask your priest.
 
There is great meaning to the fact that the rich man does not have a name. Ask your priest.
Oh the rich man has a name Mickey. I know who God is talking about. I think we all can find a little bit of the rich man in ourself. And I don’t think we have to be rich either. We can also be very Poor. And God can be talking about us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top