Does the Catholic Church teach from the Bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smiddle
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
(name removed by moderator);9431636:
BTW I didn’t write that, Wendy did, but I find her words perfectly clear. If, by gnomic, you mean incomprehensible, I for one comprehend. Please read John 3 and Jesus’ gentle words in answer to Nicodemus. Unless you are Born Again you will neither see nor enter the Kingdom of God. You might have meant ‘Gnostic’ but there is no secret understanding given to special people. The Holy Spirit will teach you ALL things. Ask HIM! And ask the Catholic Church (and a few others) why they don’t advocate (maybe thats too polite a word) Jesus’ recommendation to be Born Again?
Jesus is clear in that passage that one is born again by water and the Holy Spirit - that is to say, the Sacrament of Baptism.

Not the Holy Spirit alone, or water alone, but both, together and at the end of the Gospel of Matthew, he specifies that Baptism must be done in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

An emotional experience is not a Sacrament. 🙂
 
New? In a three year cycle, the readings at Mass cover virtually the WHOLE Bible
That’s just untrue. It’s a claim that comes up over and over and over on this forum, but it isn’t so. And the fact that Catholics think it’s so makes the OP’s point. Clearly Catholics in many cases aren’t studying the Bible outside Mass, or they’d know that there’s a lot they aren’t hearing in Mass!

According to this website, the Sunday/feastday three-year lectionary covers less than 4% of the OT (excluding the Psalms) and about 40% of the NT.

Even if you attended daily Mass the percentage would just go up to 13.5% and 71.5% respectively.

That’s not “virtually the whole Bible” by any means.

It’s an impressive amount of the NT, for sure. But not all. And only a small portion of the OT–a tiny portion if you just count Sundays and feastdays.

Edwin
 
That’s just untrue. It’s a claim that comes up over and over and over on this forum, but it isn’t so. And the fact that Catholics think it’s so makes the OP’s point. Clearly Catholics in many cases aren’t studying the Bible outside Mass, or they’d know that there’s a lot they aren’t hearing in Mass!

According to this website, the Sunday/feastday three-year lectionary covers less than 4% of the OT (excluding the Psalms) and about 40% of the NT.

Even if you attended daily Mass the percentage would just go up to 13.5% and 71.5% respectively.

That’s not “virtually the whole Bible” by any means.

It’s an impressive amount of the NT, for sure. But not all. And only a small portion of the OT–a tiny portion if you just count Sundays and feastdays.

Edwin
The question should be then what of that 86.5% is not included and why? I would venture a guess that it is large portions of Leviticus and numbers, Ruth. Proverbs. I believe that there are only 1 or 2 readings from Tobit the same with other books from the duetro-canonicals. Another good question would be are those who attend these Protestant services even getting this much exposure and are they studying in there Bible studies them?
 
Having grown up a cradle Catholic in the mid 50’s to 60’s, this was a question I always had as well. I was aware that the Epistles and Gospels read at Mass were from the Bible but never once did we “study” the Bible back then. I don’t recall that we even HAD a Bible in the classroom…and this was a traditional conservative Catholic school in the pre VII era.
We had the Baltimore Catechism. Period.
Then I started at a Catholic high school and the very first day in religion class, the priest told us, “From this day forward, you can take everything Sister Mary Blackskirt taught you and throw it out the window.”
And, he DID.
 
I yearn to see the signs of the believers demonstrated in all our churches, confirming the Word of God and drawing unhappy people to Jesus in love. A couple of popes have tentatively sponsored Charismatic Renewal but the spark seems to have quenched at birth. Why, one wonders. The Holy Spirit is freely available to ALL, sitting patiently like a wallflower waiting to be asked. We Charismatics aren’t specially selected, we are simple twits who ASKED!
I don’t understand what you expect to see. What reaction should other people give you as a sign that they are filled with the Holy Spirit?
 
And ask the Catholic Church (and a few others) why they don’t advocate (maybe thats too polite a word) Jesus’ recommendation to be Born Again?
The Catholic Church ardently DOES advocate being ‘Born Again’. We just call it the Sacrament of Baptism.
 
I don’t understand what you expect to see. What reaction should other people give you as a sign that they are filled with the Holy Spirit?
Perhaps they should fall on the ground, foam at the mouth, and babble senselessly. 🤷

(I’ve been tempted to call an exorcist to some of these Charismatic meetings that I’ve seen.)
 
Then I started at a Catholic high school and the very first day in religion class, the priest told us, “From this day forward, you can take everything Sister Mary Blackskirt taught you and throw it out the window.”
And, he DID.
For some reason this reminds me of a poster who wrote some time back that his professor once told his class (probably hyperbolically) to throw their English Bibles in the trash. But then I doubt if many nuns are teaching Latin or Greek these days either.
 
I don’t understand what you expect to see. What reaction should other people give you as a sign that they are filled with the Holy Spirit?
Jesus says (Mk. 16:127 & 18): “These signs shall FOLLOW the Believers…” That is, Believers in JESUS. In the expereince of Millions, those asking Jesus to be their Lord and Master, are led to a second Baptism, a laying on of hands, and immediately begin to demonstrate those signs. Tongues seem to be the most common initial gift, followed by Healing and Exorcism. All in the NAME OF JESUS. I have both watched and laid hands on the sick and driven out demons - IN THE NAME OF JESUS: I must stress that JESUS does the healing and driving out of demons. When you have been given the authority to use HIS name and witnessed a miracle you, like me, will look at your own hands in astonishment: “did I do that?” Swiftly followed by a gentle voice “no, Ian, (Mary, Ann, Richard (He will call you by your name!:)), I did!” I don’t need to see the signs, but others do, to draw them to Jesus. Often, there are no instant miracles (except for exorcism: I KNOW that the other fellow hates Christians and, as one of the 72 said, “I saw Satan falling like lightning!” (Luke 10:18).😉 but I have felt that, once I have done my job, the healing is in the Lord’s time.
I do wish the church would encourage their flock to seek the signs. But, having said that, turning to Jesus simply to acquire the gifts of the Holy Spirit is a no no. Sometimes I hear the Lord referring to “cupboard love”😃
 
Perhaps they should fall on the ground, foam at the mouth, and babble senselessly. 🤷

(I’ve been tempted to call an exorcist to some of these Charismatic meetings that I’ve seen.)
I have been to Charismatic meetings for thirty years and I think I’ve only seen that twice. No need to call an exorcist, one has already driven out the demon, who is resisting expulsion. Demons even argued with Jesus (Matt 8:28 - 34) in the incident my sister used to call “the gaberdine swine!” But normally they flee at the Name of Jesus. Be warned, don’t try this alone, unless your faith is strong. Even then two is better, to watch each other’s backs.
 
I have been to Charismatic meetings for thirty years and I think I’ve only seen that twice. No need to call an exorcist, one has already driven out the demon, who is resisting expulsion. Demons even argued with Jesus (Matt 8:28 - 34) in the incident my sister used to call “the gaberdine swine!” But normally they flee at the Name of Jesus. Be warned, don’t try this alone, unless your faith is strong. Even then two is better, to watch each other’s backs.
Never, and I mean never attempt an exorcism yourself, as a lay person, or lay people. The only people who should be messing with that stuff are those very holy priests who’ve been officially appointed by Rome to the office of Exorcist. Other than them (or unless they request your assistance) don’t go anywhere near it - you could become badly hurt. It’s not a game.
 
Never, and I mean never attempt an exorcism yourself, as a lay person, or lay people. The only people who should be messing with that stuff are those very holy priests who’ve been officially appointed by Rome to the office of Exorcist. Other than them (or unless they request your assistance) don’t go anywhere near it - you could become badly hurt. It’s not a game.
Not a game, indeed, but if you believe in Rome, don’t go near it. If you believe in Jesus, He says (Mark 16:17 again). “These signs shall follow the believer…In my Name they will drive out demons.” But those whom the signs DO follow don’t go demon-hunting. But they do not fear demons either: the Name of Jesus used by a believer is far greater than powers and principalities. If Charlie comes a-pestering, as is his wont, we have learnt how powerful the Name of Jesus is. I recall one particularly persistent pest and I asked the Lord why it hung around. Jesus answered, “My brother has some good advice on that, Ian.” I looked up James 4:7: “Resist the devil and he will flee from you.”
BTW, according to Eusebius, appointments in the Church at Rome in his day were: 72 doorkeepers; 60 ushers; 48 exorcists; 36 readers; 24 deacons or trainee priests, the first rank of clergy. Exorcist was fairly common appointment and non-clergy, too.
The beloved John also lifts us up in his First letter, 4:4: “You, dear children, are from God and gave overcome them (spirits of anti-Christ),because the one who is IN you is greater than the one who is in the world.”
 
The Bible is the most Catholic book on the face of the planet. A lot of Catholic teachings come straight from the Bible. If you don’t believe me, go here and read some:

scripturecatholic.com/
 
I’m a little confused. You say we should not rely on others, but others should rely on us? I am confused there, can you elaborate?
We must not be virgins RELYING on others–WE MUST BE CARRYING OUR LAMPS WITH THE BRIDEGROOM. THIS IS FROM JESUS: 1 “At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. 2 Five of the virgins were foolish, and five were wise. 3 When the foolish ones took their lamps, they did not take extra266 olive oil with them. 4 But the wise ones took flasks of olive oil with their lamps. 5 When the bridegroom was delayed a long time,267 they all became drowsy and fell asleep. 6 But at midnight there was a shout, ‘Look, the bridegroom is here! Come out to meet him.’ 7 Then all the virgins woke up and trimmed their lamps. 8 The foolish ones said to the wise, ‘Give us some of your oil, because our lamps are going out.’ 9 ‘No,’ they replied. ‘There won’t be enough for you and for us. Go instead to those who sell oil and buy some for yourselves.’ 10 But while they had gone to buy it, the bridegroom arrived, and those who were ready went inside with him to the wedding banquet. Then the door was shut. 11 Later, the other virgins came too, saying, ‘Lord, lord! Let us in!’ 12 But he replied, ‘I tell you the truth, I do not know you!’ 13 Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour” (Matthew 25:1-13). [NEW ENGLISH TRANSLATION]

You might say that those going to teachers ARE filling their lamps. What would you say about those turning down others who asked for some of their OIL? Is that not l ike asking teachers for teaching? The wise virgins are going to PROVIDERS OF OIL. The foolish virgins are going to EACH OTHER FOR BORROWED OIL. THEY ARE NOT GETTING IT T HEMSELVES. THE PURPOSE OF THE CHURCH IS TO EQUIP BELIEVERS SO THAT THEY CAN STAND ON THEIR OWN TWO FEET AND NOT ALWAYS BE BEING TAUGHT BY OTHERS. The next step for the Ethiopian ministered to by Philip would have been to receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit the apostles asked believers if they had had yet BECAUSE THEY NEEDED IT. Our ultimate destiny is, “You have no need any teach you” AND “You should be teaching”… We are to be mature believers and not always “getting our oil” from another believer BUT GOING TO THE SOURCE… JESUS told us the ONLY teacher IS THE MESSIAH AND HE WOULD SEND US THE HOLY SPIRIT TO REMIND US OF ALL HE SAID AND TO LEAD US INTO ALL THAT HE HAD NOT TOLD US YET. Criticizing capitals is immaturity 😉 when done to make another LOOK FOOLISH. <3+WENDY
 
Ah…I have answered THIS. YES: no scripture IS OF PRIVATE INTERPRETATION. That means THE HOLY SPIRIT gives us interpretation NOT that any person “figure out” interpretation! WE NEED TEACHERS. Yes. WE ARE SENT. What do we teach? THE TRUTH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. Not something we made up. THE CHURCH teaches the truth. The church is ONLY those teaching the truth and walking in it. The church is NOT wolves among the members CLAIMING to speak the TRUTH. BEWARE.

Jesus Said–do not be deceived. DO NOT CLAIM “the entire visible church” is upholding THE TRUTH. That would contradict JESUS. SHEEP uphold the truth. NOT WOLVES. WOLVES ARE AMONG US. That SAID, you would say THE MAGISTERIUM is distinguished from the entire “body” and that the entire body of believers ARE NOT THE ONES TO LISTEN TO. The rulers of the Jews included evil and good. What happened to them can happen to us–we are warned by the apostle that we can be grafted or un-grafted even as the Jews and to be careful. “The teaching body” of the Jews was corrupt. JESUS did not go by NAME to determine WHO WAS DEPENDABLE. THE SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY GIVEN BY GOD–the high priest–WAS CONTRADICTED BY THE APOSTLES AND PETER, “WE MUST OBEY GOD RATHER THAN MEN,” WHEN THE TRUTH VARIED FROM THE AUTHORITY. <3+
Really? “Do not rely on others to interpret for you”? Huh. And yet the Bible tells us otherwise.

Acts 8:29-39.

Indeed, Scripture plainly says that “no prophecy of scripture is made by private interpretation” (2 Peter 1:20).

So, I’m sorry, but you’re mistaken. The Bible clearly teaches us that the Apostles (and therefore their successors, the bishops) have the authority to teach us. This is a clear teaching, not to be contradicted by some guy with a divinity degree from a mail-order catalog who wants to be the guy everyone follows. Jesus appointed a church to teach us, and He gave it the authority to teach.
 
Praise God. 🙂 There is some confusion over terminology. Some people call born again believing to be Saved, some people called Saved being baptized in the Holy Spirit, some people call baptism in the Holy Spirit THE BAPTISM IN WATER. We just need to get our terms STRAIGHT.

We a ll want the SAME THING.

We all want THE MOST WE CAN GET OUT OF BEING CHRISTIAN and TO BE ALL THAT GOD WANTS US TO BE. I do not mean that in a selfish way. Some folks like to slice and dice words. We all are subject to it, sometime–I figure.

The belief we have all come into–and we are all being made into a perfect man and are getting this straight, all of us–which is portrayed at the beginning the the Bible, shows us folks believing to be Saved. The disciples believed and the three thousand saved at the beginning of the book of Acts of the Apostles believed BEFORE ANYONE HAD TONGUES. The tongues-thing was SEPARATE.

So we have disciples wanting to follow Jesus and even Sent Out by him doing miracles before the tongues-speaking at PENTECOST–the thing portrayed in Acts… These people were believers. What the apostles knew was that they had been empowered at PENTECOST and that Jesus had told them to WAIT until that happened before going out–to fulfill the commission to go and preach to the nations. If you have ever experienced this BAPTISM OF THE HOLY SPIRIT that happened to them then–which John the Baptist described and which was “the promise” coming to them and is our “earnest” on what is coming up for us after this life: YOU KNOW YOU NEED IT.

The apostles began asking when people had been saved BY BELIEF, “Have you received the Holy Spirit SINCE YOU BELIEVED”! “We have not even heard there was such a thing!” So they told them about it–they needed it! Most of us have not even heard there was such a thing! We get it confused with the baptism of water. There is only ONE baptism of water–but see what comes Laying On Hands.

Acts 19:2 “And he said to them: Have you received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? But they said to him: We have not so much as heard whether there be a Holy Ghost. 3 And he said: In what then were you baptized? Who said: In John’s baptism. 4 Then Paul said: John baptized the people with the baptism of penance, saying: That they should believe in him who was to come after him, that is to say, in Jesus. 5 Having heard these things, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 And when Paul had imposed his hands on them, the Holy Ghost came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied. 7 And all the men were about twelve.”

And even Laying On Hands NOT:

Acts 15:15 "And when I [PETER] had begun to speak, the Holy Ghost fell upon them, as upon us also in the beginning. 16 And I remembered the word of the Lord, how that he said: John indeed baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 17 If then God gave them the same grace, as to us also who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ; who was I, that could withstand God?
[Douay-Rheims Bible]

Those folks RECEIVED THE BAPTISM–OF THE HOLY SPIRIT–WITHOUT THE LAYING-ON OF HANDS BY HEARING THE GOSPEL AND THEN THEY WERE BAPTIZED WITH WATER. NOTICE HOW IT WAS IDENTIFIED WITH THE SAME THAT HAD HAPPENED TO THEM EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE NO FLAMES.

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? ONE: THE APOSTLES THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO MAKE SURE THEY HAD IT. TWO: GOD THOUGHT IT IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO MAKE SURE THEY HAD IT. THREE: THE LORD SAID IT IS A GRACE THAT WE RECEIVE.

NOTICE–THOSE FOLKS SAY THINGS LIKE: “The Holy Spirit said No when we tried to go into Asia.” They are hearing from the Holy Spirit. This is the experience WE HAVE who have received the baptism–of the Holy Spirit–AND WE KNOW IT IS A PROMISE AND BASIC.

<3+Wendy–for starters
(name removed by moderator);9431636:
BTW I didn’t write that, Wendy did, but I find her words perfectly clear. If, by gnomic, you mean incomprehensible, I for one comprehend. Please read John 3 and Jesus’ gentle words in answer to Nicodemus. Unless you are Born Again you will neither see nor enter the Kingdom of God. You might have meant ‘Gnostic’ but there is no secret understanding given to special people. The Holy Spirit will teach you ALL things. Ask HIM! And ask the Catholic Church (and a few others) why they don’t advocate (maybe thats too polite a word) Jesus’ recommendation to be Born Again?
 
Really? “Do not rely on others to interpret for you”? Huh. And yet the Bible tells us otherwise.

Acts 8:29-39.

Indeed, Scripture plainly says that “no prophecy of scripture is made by private interpretation” (2 Peter 1:20).

So, I’m sorry, but you’re mistaken. COLOR=“Red”]The Bible clearly teaches us that the Apostles (and therefore their successors, the bishops) have the authority to teach us
This is a clear teaching, not to be contradicted by some guy with a divinity degree from a mail-order catalog who wants to be the guy everyone follows. Jesus appointed a church to teach us, and He gave it the authority to teach.

I’m sorry too: where in the Bible does it say that only bishops are the apostles’ successors? “The Church” (ekklesian, in Jesus’ words) is ALL of us, including priests who seem to have set themselves apart and above.
I always thought the apostles were in the upper room when the Holy Spirit came upon them. But checking just now Acts 2:1 reads “…they were ALL together in one place.” , ALL being probably defined in Acts 1:13 -15. about 120 believers, the eleven apostles along with "the women and Mary, the mother of Jesus and His brothers.
Paul was not there, yet his teaching dominates the early church. And it should be noted that he was not flavour of the month with the elders in Jerusalem.

PS An earlier quote from jmacrae: An emotional experience is not a Sacrament. 🙂 Where in the Bible are “Sacraments” specified, too? Why are some Church actions deemed ultra-holy and others, equally sacred, demoted? Those who have received the laying on of hands Baptism of the Spirit would define the signs that Jesus speaks of as positively Spiritual experiences rather than “emotional”. To our view, the second (emotive?) Baptism of the Spirit should be a Sacrament, ratified and confirmed by the immediate granting of the signs, the gifts and later the fruits of the Spirit. To those infilled (WE will make our abode with you) the law is written on hearts of flesh rather than tablets of stone. Don’t ask me why, but I can’t even park on a double-yellow line or a disabled space. I just can’t!!!
 
I think this can be explained like this:

Is not the whole Gregorian calendar a trip through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, with passages from the bible which coincide? Don’t the teachers tell you to go to mass? There are very mature things in the bible, they don’t want to just give you the book and say, “Here, read it.” They give it to you and get you started. It is through going to mass in which we all go through the bible together, so we remain, shall I say, “on the same page.” Catholics don’t discourage the reading of the bible, just think it doesn’t need to be rushed into because its subject matter is so huge, and the lessons that it teaches are more important than knowing each and every story and a Sunday school age.
 
We must not be virgins RELYING on others–WE MUST BE CARRYING OUR LAMPS WITH THE BRIDEGROOM. THIS IS FROM JESUS: 1 “At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. 2 Five of the virgins were foolish, and five were wise. 3 When the foolish ones took their lamps, they did not take extra266 olive oil with them. 4 But the wise ones took flasks of olive oil with their lamps. 5 When the bridegroom was delayed a long time,267 they all became drowsy and fell asleep. 6 But at midnight there was a shout, ‘Look, the bridegroom is here! Come out to meet him.’ 7 Then all the virgins woke up and trimmed their lamps. 8 The foolish ones said to the wise, ‘Give us some of your oil, because our lamps are going out.’ 9 ‘No,’ they replied. ‘There won’t be enough for you and for us. Go instead to those who sell oil and buy some for yourselves.’ 10 But while they had gone to buy it, the bridegroom arrived, and those who were ready went inside with him to the wedding banquet. Then the door was shut. 11 Later, the other virgins came too, saying, ‘Lord, lord! Let us in!’ 12 But he replied, ‘I tell you the truth, I do not know you!’ 13 Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour” (Matthew 25:1-13). [NEW ENGLISH TRANSLATION]

You might say that those going to teachers ARE filling their lamps. What would you say about those turning down others who asked for some of their OIL? Is that not l ike asking teachers for teaching? The wise virgins are going to PROVIDERS OF OIL. The foolish virgins are going to EACH OTHER FOR BORROWED OIL. THEY ARE NOT GETTING IT T HEMSELVES. THE PURPOSE OF THE CHURCH IS TO EQUIP BELIEVERS SO THAT THEY CAN STAND ON THEIR OWN TWO FEET AND NOT ALWAYS BE BEING TAUGHT BY OTHERS. The next step for the Ethiopian ministered to by Philip would have been to receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit the apostles asked believers if they had had yet BECAUSE THEY NEEDED IT. Our ultimate destiny is, “You have no need any teach you” AND “You should be teaching”… We are to be mature believers and not always “getting our oil” from another believer BUT GOING TO THE SOURCE… JESUS told us the ONLY teacher IS THE MESSIAH AND HE WOULD SEND US THE HOLY SPIRIT TO REMIND US OF ALL HE SAID AND TO LEAD US INTO ALL THAT HE HAD NOT TOLD US YET. Criticizing capitals is immaturity 😉 when done to make another LOOK FOOLISH. <3+WENDY
Respectfully, you miss the point of the passage completely, this passage does not apply to this topic without some huge leaps. I would suggest a good bible with solid interpretation, if you are williing.

You seem to have the view that some people have the key to knowledge of God, while others are dependent on them, yet you say do not depend on others… You seem to contradict yourself.:confused:
Who ordains (if I may borrow a phrase) certain people as providers of the knowledge of God and His Word? On what or whose authority do you base your assertions? Or is it you that decides this in a vacuum?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top