L
Little_Mary
Guest
That doesn’t surprise me.I thought it was quite humerous myself given some of the things said here about Protestants.
That doesn’t surprise me.I thought it was quite humerous myself given some of the things said here about Protestants.
fair is fair or at least should be, don’t you think?That doesn’t surprise me.
That Catholic interpretation comes from Christ himself. The Catholic church was established by Christ himself.A person has an interpretation, a church or denomination has an interpretation and your Magisterium has an interpretation. What’s the difference? They are all interpretations its just that you believe that the Magisterium’s is right. Others believe it is not.
This is where i see the real difference between catholics and everyone else.Infallibilty is nothing that the scriptures ever say. Even Peter himself scripture says was not infallible. I don’t believe anyone is infallible except for God. I believe that we as one church (all the believer’s) in unison with the intercession of the Holy Spirit can interpret scripture. 1 Timothy says to read and study the word so that you will know the truth. Scripture never suggests it to a hierarchy but to us as individuals. As far as the perpetual virginity of Mary I don’t believe it is a Scriptural teaching although it is a Catholic teaching. Same as the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption.
Scripture says that the church is the fountain of truth – meaning that false teaching can NOT come from it. Jesus also promised that He would send His Holy Spirit to the church to guide it in ALL truths. We know that this promise was not meant for individuals privately; otherwise, how do you explain that private individuals have arrived at different conclusions on …Infallibilty is nothing that the scriptures ever say.
Where does Peter say that? Chapter & verse please.Even Peter himself scripture says was not infallible.
And, as I said above, God’s Holy Spirit is guiiding the Church in all truths.I don’t believe anyone is infallible except for God.
On the contrary. St. Paul goes into great depth explaining the hierarchy of the church.Scripture never suggests it to a hierarchy but to us as individuals.
First off, the church is not MERELY a group of believers. The bible is very clear on this. The church has an official & visible structure with appointed (not SELF-appointed) bishops, priests, etc. Secondly, WITH the intercession of the Holy Spirit one CAN can interpret scripture BUT there is NO assurance in scripture that every individual will have that guidance of the Holy Spirit. If they did, there would not be wide disagreement on …I believe that we as one church (all the believer’s) in unison with the intercession of the Holy Spirit can interpret scripture.
IF we understand it correctly, we will know the truth and if we misunderstand it, 1 Peter tells us that it bring about our ruin.1 Timothy says to read and study the word so that you will know the truth.
The fact that something is not found in scripture has no bearing on anything. Doesn’t scripture itself command us to obey the ORAL instructions that were handed down to us?As far as the perpetual virginity of Mary I don’t believe it is a Scriptural teaching although it is a Catholic teaching. Same as the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption.
Eggsactly.A person has an interpretation, a church or denomination has an interpretation and your Magisterium has an interpretation. What’s the difference? They are all interpretations its just that you believe that the Magisterium’s is right. Others believe it is not.
Self-proclaimed? Hardly! I guess you haven’t been following along. Here are some scripture passages which explicitly or implicitly speak of infallibility in the Church founded by Jesus Christ which has been known since the first century as the Catholic Church:Eggsactly.
The RCC’s self-proclaimed authority, and infallibility are just that—self-proclaimed—not
very convincing.
I’m the King of the World!![]()
Not following along? Hardly!Self-proclaimed? Hardly! I guess you haven’t been following along.
Then why do you disbelieve the passages that I quoted from the Word of God which supports these arguments?Not following along? Hardly!
I’ve been on this forum for two years, and have heard the same arguments countless times.![]()
You are turning a deaf ear to that which you desire to turn a deaf ear to.Eggsactly.
The RCC’s self-proclaimed authority, and infallibility are just that—self-proclaimed—not
very convincing.
I’m the King of the World!![]()
Good point, brother.<<I hope so brother!- the one thing I don’t want to have in seeking out God’s wisdom is a thick skull.
May God Bless, Pat>>
And by your use of “brother,” do you mean to imply we have the same biological mother?
I don’t think so.![]()
You falsely assume that my rejection of your understanding of those passages is “disbelief.”Then why do you disbelieve the passages that I quoted from the Word of God which supports these arguments?
This is worth repeating.<<The RCC‚s self-proclaimed authority, and infallibility are just that˜self-proclaimed˜not
very convincing.>>
As I understand it, the pope is infalliable only under certain carefully defined conditions.
However, every Protestant considers himself infallible in all things.
At least, that’s how it seems to me.
As are you.You are turning a deaf ear to that which you desire to turn a deaf ear to.
My step mother and her dh were married, used no protection and did not concieve until their 13th year of marriage. They now have 2 sons 3 and 2 as well as my half sister who is now 20yrsA 12 year gap??? And then a passel of other kids all of a sudden? Possible, but most unlikely. I’d go so far as to say that my mother, herself a mother of five as well as having been a doctor for 35 years, would never have seen such a case.:
If my understanding of those passages is incorrect, then perhaps you would be kind enough to show me where the mistakes were made.You falsely assume that my rejection of your understanding of those passages is “disbelief.”![]()
This is my biggest concern…not whether of not Jesus’ had siblings, but why scripture says UNTIL and yet she is still a virgin after Jesus birth and her marriage. That makes no sense to me.I can’t subscribe to this belief. Why? Well, because it is simply not Biblical. Nowhere in scripture does it say or even suggest that Mary and Joseph didn’t do on to have a normal physical marriage. I am not mocking your belief here, I am simply saying that Scripture even goes on to say that they didn’t have a physical relationship UNTIL after Jesus was born. Your belief is not supported an ounce in the Bible but yet to believe that Jesus had brothers and sisters is. I think that you have to work far more to make an argument for the perpetual virginity of Mary than you do to just read scripture for what it says.