Donald Trump attacks Hillary Clinton as wins set stage for brutal election

[ComplineSanFran]

Which candidate promotes brother love more, and is more humanitarian overall? Brotherly love should be the top value which our society is based. It is the central value for Jews and Christians (I’m not sure how the Muslims view brotherly love).

What about all the Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, pagans, ‘nones’, and atheists (and others) in our country? Do they get a say in such a value?

 

[signit]

Rasmussen leans right. I would read this as Clinton 41, Trump 39 taking into account the finger on the scale.

Agreed, and that’s just one poll out of many.

Just about every other recent poll (except another Rasmussen poll) shows Clinton wining, and usually winning big.

 

[Theo520]

I have had a problem with her ethics since the cattle futures scandal. I probably don’t like the direction she would go, but she is not very specific in her proposed policies. But the one thing that is obvious, is that she has no experience working with republicans.

I think Senate republicans liked her better than Ted.
She’s proven she will play the ‘establishment’ version of DC politics.

 

[Lily_Bernans]

Which candidate promotes brotherly love more, and is more humanitarian overall? Brotherly love should be the top value which our society is based. It is the central value for Jews and Christians (I’m not sure how the Muslims view brotherly love).

That would be Sanders.

 

[Lily_Bernans]

Agreed, and that’s just one poll out of many.

Just about every other recent poll (except another Rasmussen poll) shows Clinton wining, and usually winning big.

The one’s I looked at this morning also showed Clinton winning by a large margin.

 

[Lily_Bernans]

What about all the Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, pagans, ‘nones’, and atheists (and others) in our country? Do they get a say in such a value?

Again, Sanders.

 

[GaryTaylor]

Again, Sanders.

Contested covention and a great idea for Bernie.

But the polls from what I am hearing are now in real time slightly changing as the OP indicates because of Cruz affecting the Trump following of late. More Cruz followers are accepting Donald may be the nominee which accounts for slight fluctuation.

Have to see the following polls to know if any significance exists imho.

 

[mary_bobo]

Rasmussen leans right. I would read this as Clinton 41, Trump 39 taking into account the finger on the scale.

You can get any result you want with a poll, depending on how the questions are phrased.

 

[RPRPsych]

You can get any result you want with a poll, depending on how the questions are phrased.

Exactly. Having taken and administered tons of questionnaires, I can attest to that.

That said, if this is accurate, it’s good news. While I’d rather vote for Donald Duck than Donald Trump (c’mon, who can turn down the Hockey Champ of Duck Swamp, even for a multi-millionaire), the man would at least be an entertaining head of state, and will surely do better than Mrs. Bill Clinton.

 

[Prodigal_40s]

You can get any result you want with a poll, depending on how the questions are phrased.

True. The best one for “us” in a poll would be “You’re Catholic and wouldn’t support a pro-abortion candidate. Who would you vote for then?”

 

[Prodigal_40s]

Exactly. Having taken and administered tons of questionnaires, I can attest to that.

That said, if this is accurate, it’s good news. While I’d rather vote for Donald Duck than Donald Trump (c’mon, who can turn down the Hockey Champ of Duck Swamp, even for a multi-millionaire), the man would at least be an entertaining head of state, and will surely do better than Mrs. Bill Clinton.

A vote for Hillary Clinton is guaranteeing War of some kind and possibly a Global Nuclear War.

That’s the reason the Neocons love her. I’m very fearful of her winning the election and so should all of us

 

[Boatswain2PA]

That would be Sanders.

Agreed. Sanders is certainly that.

The problem with Sanders, though, is that his economic policies would result in decades of abject economic misery for Americans.

America is the wealthiest, and most generous, nation on the planet. However we are broke.

Bernie’s economic plans would ensure we would collapse entirely, and therefore not have the means to help others as we have done for so long.

 

[GaryTaylor]

My opinion is that the least likely of the war mongers is Bernie and Donald. Hillary is deadly, no telling what country she’ll destabilize next. And, she’ll have you fighting right here in the streets too let alone the WH and TV and everywhere else. I think they should take the mic from her and Bill. Scary indeed, and Bill “I think” has something wrong, he’s always arguing and starting fights now. I think he should have a check up imho. Thats not the same cool responsive Bill of the 90s. They are both aging in front of our eyes, they should retire for the sake of us all.

 

[FollowChrist34]

True. The best one for “us” in a poll would be “You’re Catholic and wouldn’t support a pro-abortion candidate. Who would you vote for then?”

Tough one - how about the one that takes less donations from Planned Parenthood? Or maybe just the one that Planned Parenthood is not supporting? (keep it simple?)

 

[RPRPsych]

A vote for Hillary Clinton is guaranteeing War of some kind and possibly a Global Nuclear War.

Or probably just more progressive “morality” and masterful yielding to hostile forces.

That’s the reason the Neocons love her. I’m very fearful of her winning the election and so should all of us

Same here. I think a President Trump would be a good dose of cold water for our own head of state, who has been cozying up to President Obama and using him to build up his own image in the most absurd fashion. (Besides, I’ve got to love Trump for mocking the whole call-centre thing. Call centres have placed a lot of money and liberty in the hands of young Indians who do not know what exactly to do with it, and the results have been disastrous. If a President Trump wants those jobs back, this Indian is 200% on his side. )

 

[meltzerboy]

The cattle futures and taking $200,000 worth of items from the WH when they moved out. And then there are the many others shady things that follow her.

Then she should be great at working with Congress, most of whom understand (and some of whom practice) unethical behavior. Also, don’t forget Clinton has been, or has been labeled, virtually everything: a Republican in her early years, a centrist, a moderate, a liberal, a progressive, a feminist, an opportunist, a warmonger. She should get along just fine since she can morph into anyone.

 

[meltzerboy]

rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/trump_41_clinton_39

General election polls are a little too early to be of much value. However, I maintain that a Trump-Clinton contest will be a close one.

 

[Ridgerunner]

A vote for Hillary Clinton is guaranteeing War of some kind and possibly a Global Nuclear War.

Maybe not. If some country offers Bill Clinton a multi-million dollar “speaking fee” for Hillary not starting a war, it won’t happen. (Wonder what China would pay for Taiwan)

 

[Ridgerunner]

I think Senate republicans liked her better than Ted.
She’s proven she will play the ‘establishment’ version of DC politics.

She might be too expensive to afford, though.

I realize this is nuts and won’t happen, but something in me would like to see Trump select Sen. Joe Manchin, and for Manchin to accept. Yes, yes, I know he’s a nominal Democrat, but look.

ontheissues.org/Joe_Manchin_III.htm

 

[Lily_Bernans]

Then she should be great at working with Congress, most of whom understand (and some of whom practice) unethical behavior. Also, don’t forget Clinton has been, or has been labeled, virtually everything: a Republican in her early years, a centrist, a moderate, a liberal, a progressive, a feminist, an opportunist, a warmonger. She should get along just fine since she can morph into anyone.

LOL That’s true!