Donald Trump attacks Hillary Clinton as wins set stage for brutal election

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorolfr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump is conservative and pro-life. He could be the savior of America and we need to accept that.
The “savior of America”? Really?

Anyone who thinks any presidential candidate in any election cycle could be the “savior of America” might want to rethink the difference between politics and faith.
 
The majority of Americans were disgusted by the Starr investigations back then – pretty sure the number who care now about Bill’s affair with Monica is low.
No kidding. Not too mention that Monica is an actual human being with feelings that does not deserve to be tarnished again. Hillary reconciled with Bill after an admission of infidelity. Is that a bad thing? Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
 
The “savior of America”? Really?

Anyone who thinks any presidential candidate in any election cycle could be the “savior of America” might want to rethink the difference between politics and faith.
Should we talk about Barack Obama?
 
A little off topic, but I agree completely.
That would be the one where the soldiers ignored the explicit orders of the Pope, became mercenaries for a Byzantine prince, helped him seize the throne, and then sacked Constantinople when they weren’t paid, I believe.
 
Trump is conservative and pro-life. He could be the savior of America and we need to accept that.
Trump is not pro life due to Trumps stance that some form of abortions are ok. But also Trump needs to be more pleasant to Mexicans, Chinese and Muslims. Being Pro life means that your buying into the truth that all lives matter.
 
Trump is not pro life due to Trumps stance that some form of abortions are ok. But also Trump needs to be more pleasant to Mexicans, Chinese and Muslims. Being Pro life means that your buying into the truth that all lives matter.
👍
 
Trump is not pro life due to Trumps stance that some form of abortions are ok. But also Trump needs to be more pleasant to Mexicans, Chinese and Muslims. Being Pro life means that your buying into the truth that all lives matter.
I agree that Trump needs to be more thoughtful, to say the least, in regards his comments in regards to people but it looks likes it is between Clinton and Trump and Trump is the lesser of two evils on abortion. I hope nobody buy into this idea that they are the same on abortion either. Hillary Clinton is far worse on the issue than Trump is.
 
I don’t see how does any of the things on your long list of day one actions on day one. Most he probably can’t do at all. Probably none on day one.

Tax reform on day one? Reforming EPA regulations? Repealing a bunch of laws? He would be lucky to get those done in a year, let alone a day. I don’t think he can get them done at all, frankly.
Tax reform on Day One?

Heck, YES!!!

You don’t need to change all 72,000 pages of the tax code on day one. BUT it is easy to change the table of tax rates. One page.

AND since Congress is in session from January One, it is EASY for them to publish a bill with the new tax percentages and have President Trump sign it into law on January 20th … Day One.

AND since Mr. Trump advocates a low tax percentage rate, then the revised and updated tax percentage(s) would be very simple. Less than one page.

AND since Mr. Trump advocates abolishing depreciation schedules and is in favor of same year full depreciation, then, again … very very easy to do and it totally simplifies the tax rules.

One sentence.

On Day One.

Even the gun free zone signs … gone. One sentence. On all Federal properties and Federally financed properties, gun free zone signs are forbidden. And shall be removed immediately.

“Repeal EPA regulations”?

That is even easier than changing laws.

BECAUSE EPA REGULATIONS ARE NOT LAWS. They do not require Congressional debate and passage.

EPA regulations are merely bureaucratic rules and regulations; they can be changed instantly by the bureaucracy. One day. Day One.

The bureaucracy reports directly to the President.

So, President Trump could just stand up at the podium and announce the changes … and that is IT … done and done.
 
I agree that Trump needs to be more thoughtful, to say the least, in regards his comments in regards to people but it looks likes it is between Clinton and Trump and Trump is the lesser of two evils on abortion. I hope nobody buy into this idea that they are the same on abortion either. Hillary Clinton is far worse on the issue than Trump is.
👍 And hes a Republican who needs to show he is responsible as a Republican to his commitment and platform.
I hope nobody buy into this idea that they are the same on abortion either. Hillary Clinton is far worse on the issue than Trump is.
Oh heck no, we can safely say he is light years away in thinking, empathy. conscience and concern compared to Hillary and the unborn. Hillary sees each poor confused pregnant women as a burden and a $$ sign. Ben Carson missed not a thing about Hillary PP and Sanger.

I find many aspects of these parties disturbing but none as much as the strident clamor of the evil abortion agenda of Hillary. You know Ab, I don’t just think “A” abortion is intrinsic evil, I think the entire agenda is an intrinsic evil and the “main” issue creating chaos and fueling the others. And Hillary is the leader of that cult.
 
Trump is not pro life due to Trumps stance that some form of abortions are ok. But also Trump needs to be more pleasant to Mexicans, Chinese and Muslims. Being Pro life means that your buying into the truth that all lives matter.
Trump would be a hugely whole lot better than the crew we have in Washington now.

And Mrs. Clinton is the biggest abortion advocate that there is anywhere in the USA.

Not even a close comparison between Trump and Clinton.

Trump is light years ahead of and better than Clinton.
 
The “savior of America”? Really?

Anyone who thinks any presidential candidate in any election cycle could be the “savior of America” might want to rethink the difference between politics and faith.
We are counting on the left and right unity saving “US”. You know imho under all the drama I “know” deep down in their hearts thats what Americans want by large.

Democrats need more hugs and prayer. :

Happy Mothers Day! 🙂
 
Getting rid of some regulations can be easy if you don’t care what the result is. If you do care, it takes some time to figure out how to adjust regulations without creating unintended problems. But most regulations are more difficult to change than that. The president can order the EPA to change some of their regulations, for example, but public review and commentary is still required. And he can’t, as another example, simply cancel CAFE standards, which are mandated by statute. The EPA can adjust CAFE to a certain degree, but can’t simply do away with it.

Governing is more complex than most people seem to want to admit. It is not as simple as the President shouting “tax reform” or “simplify regulations” and having that happen.
Rules and regulations are not laws. Rules and regulations are imposed by the bureaucrats. And because of that, they can be extended and / or stretched and or modified.

And a lot of rules and regulations stipulate that they shall be effective “as the Administrator shall specify”. Or “To Be Determined”.

ObamaCare legislation has THOUSANDS of stipulations that the “administrator shall specify”.

So it would be extremely easy to make them optional or to zero them out.
 
Should we talk about Barack Obama?
After the smug Ivy League condescending speech yesterday there’s no need. Obviously he can’t help himself. What I found more troubling than that was the Kerry commencement speech at Northeastern/Boston yesterday. He’s leading my brothers and sisters astray again Peter J, I find it in particular offensive as a native. 😉

Either point is worthy of a thread especially the Northeastern speech, wow, unbelievable. New world order globalization chatter not going to happen as John envisions.
 
The “savior of America”? Really?

Anyone who thinks any presidential candidate in any election cycle could be the “savior of America” might want to rethink the difference between politics and faith.
The government is not supposed to be imposing a suicide pact onto the United States of America.

But when the Border Patrol is ordered to stand down as it is now.

When reliable electric generators are shut down in favor of mandates for unreliable and expensive wind and solar electricity owned by Democrat cronies.

When the tax code makes the USA 31st in the world in terms of tax unfavorability.

When the education system makes the USA 27th in the world in terms of math education.

When individuals are forbidden to seek their own preferred medical treatment.

When a cake baker is fined thousands of dollars.

When natural resources are shut down to create the latest wilderness preserve.

When people are not allowed to work more than 30 hours a week … or be subject to draconian rules and regulations.

When the IRS selects targeted groups for deliberate persecution.

Then if someone like Mr. Trump comes along and says he will reverse the bureaucratic rules and regulations that are strangulating our country …

… well, then maybe … just maybe … he could be the savior of America.
 
Tax reform on Day One?

Heck, YES!!!

You don’t need to change all 72,000 pages of the tax code on day one. BUT it is easy to change the table of tax rates. One page.

AND since Congress is in session from January One, it is EASY for them to publish a bill with the new tax percentages and have President Trump sign it into law on January 20th … Day One.

AND since Mr. Trump advocates a low tax percentage rate, then the revised and updated tax percentage(s) would be very simple. Less than one page.

AND since Mr. Trump advocates abolishing depreciation schedules and is in favor of same year full depreciation, then, again … very very easy to do and it totally simplifies the tax rules.

One sentence.

On Day One.
I’m sorry, but this is pure fantasy. The GOP controlled congress hasn’t passed major legislation in years, how will it get that done in 20 days? And they couldn’t get it done when Bush was in office, either. There is no easy one page (or one sentence) solution to tax reform.
Even the gun free zone signs … gone. One sentence. On all Federal properties and Federally financed properties, gun free zone signs are forbidden. And shall be removed immediately.
Then why has the GOP not been able to accomplish this?
“Repeal EPA regulations”?
That is even easier than changing laws.
BECAUSE EPA REGULATIONS ARE NOT LAWS. They do not require Congressional debate and passage.
EPA regulations are merely bureaucratic rules and regulations; they can be changed instantly by the bureaucracy. One day. Day One.
The bureaucracy reports directly to the President.
So, President Trump could just stand up at the podium and announce the changes … and that is IT … done and done.
None of that is remotely true. Most, if not all, EPA regulations are based in statute, like the CAFE standards. They can’t simply be done away with without congressional action. And even adjustments to the regulations require public comment and a review period, and are then subject to legal action from private entities. It is not a matter of just announcing that you are changing all the laws in the country, and having that take effect the next day. That is simply not how the government works.
 
Thank you! Trump clearly doesn’t put the whiny causes on his “to do” list and neither do I.

If some folks could quit screaming in their safe spaces when they heard Trump could lead a “make America great again” unified effort, we could make some progress.

Here is a good idea: soundproof the safe spaces for the whiny, screaming, idiots.
 
Here is a good idea: soundproof the safe spaces for the whiny, screaming, idiots.
:eek: Thats that new PC agenda driven concept? I mean what up with that, really? Everyone gets a safe space and time out area in public too? I’m not grasping the concept.

I hate to even begin to sound rude but at first blush it sounds thin skinned and wildly immature. Is this part of liberal education today that leaves these kids unable to converse with more level minded conservatives? Wheres the disconnect in this conversation but the education?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top