Donald Trump Presidential Campaign Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Bay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jeanne_S said:
Dream on,ain’t gonna happen:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
To be honest it’s the Republicans who are wailing and gnashing their teeth now. After the speeches that Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden gave tonight, there will be all out war.
 
Good_Tidings said:
To be honest it’s the Republicans who are wailing and gnashing their teeth now. After the speeches that Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden gave tonight, there will be all out war.
Click to expand...
Warren went on a rampage.

Biden was calm and gave some great punches.

Ironically Trump didn’t tweet anything.
 
Let me ask a hypothetical question to everyone.

Johnson the libertarian candidate is at 12%. In order for a a third party to be in a debate they must be at 15%.

This is the question. 2 weeks prior to the first presidential debate, this is how the polls nationally show
1% will go with a 4th option/ other
3% undecided
16% Johnson (he’s being competitive in 6 states, 2 democratic states, 2 republican states and 2 swing states)
41% Hillary
38% trump

Do you at this point want your candidate to keep attacking the other guy, or do you want your candidate to start speaking of specifics in regards to policies?
 
Hypothetical identity politics? This has been happening for years with Obama. Point out Trumps same use of democratic tit for tat tactics helps how? Yes unfortunate he uses the same tactics. Ugly stuff but its been on-going.
Following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. When some on the left questioned the nomination of a man in his 60s who is of the Jewish faith, the president conceded that Judge Garland is indeed “a white guy, but he’s a really outstanding jurist.” Note the “but,” -Wall Street Journal
Click to expand...
I think people want to scream racism because racism has been being played for a few years. After all the divisiveness in the country by Obama its quite predictable with both of these parties, and the politics become as it was last night-childish. Late night reality TV politics. Talking about issues is futile with Obama as he has a imaginative view of reality, as with the economy on reality late night TV. Maybe its funny talking about the economy with the band playing and making a jingle out of it, but the point is most of america does not believe Obamas take on the economy as indicated and by the top issues of priority in politics. I would say its more serious than indicated by turning it into entertainment on late night TV. Such is the case with Hillary as she found out with WV and various peoples across America concerned about the economy, jobs and employment let alone tax reform etc.

Obama has a altered view of reality to many americans, so the conversation is more or less as I said “futile”. You hear lies weekly on the news like with Hillary, Iran, ACA the middle east etc. Whats there to discuss when Obama thinks he won two wars and bought peace in Syria? He’s not lacking imagination, but his foresight, and intellectual honesty along with Hillary basically can’t be believed anymore. Its like state broadcasting to the indoctrinated.
The Obama administration confirmed Monday that it began a new wave of arrests of Central American immigrant families over the weekend, moving forward with deportations of mothers and children despite an outcry from immigrant rights groups and potential political fallout for Democrats.
Click to expand...
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said in a statement that 121 people were taken into custody in Georgia, Texas and North Carolina in recent days and will soon face deportation.
Click to expand...
politico.com/story/2016/01/obama-family-deportation-raids-217329

Obama has a optical mess and double standards everywhere and the migrants are further proof.

To put this in perspective, conversation with the Obama/Hillary team is basically non existing and tit for tat and non productive paths forward are quite predictable. In fact its why a good majority have had enough with this administration and by admission thats Hillary too.

abcnews.go.com/US/feds-conduct-raids-targeting-undocumented-immigrants-entered-us/story?id=39075923
Federal authorities plan to begin a series of targeted raids to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants, according to a government source who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.
Click to expand...
The Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will target undocumented immigrants who have entered the country within the last two years, the source said.
Click to expand...
The raids, expected to begin in upcoming weeks, will specifically target those who recently crossed the U.S. border. Included in this group are immigrants from Central America who came into the U.S. in 2014 to escape violent conditions in their home country.
Click to expand...
Obama raids homes in the middle of the night and has been all year. He and Hillary invented the double standard and perfected identify politics. Imagine that someone should speak up to their chaos. Well, they would do what?

Bernie “has” Hillary even lying about helping the illegal aliens Obama is deporting and rounding up. I guess the democrats will clarify the issues for us they are so unified on. Bernie wants hugs for criminals, and Hillary who called them “super predators” now wants to give out grandma Hillary hugs.
 
Of course no Christian will be voting for Trump. Too bad there aren’t many Christians in American, something I’ve understood for nearly 60 years 😦
 
lynnvinc said:
Of course no Christian will be voting for Trump. Too bad there aren’t many Christians in American, something I’ve understood for nearly 60 years 😦
Click to expand...
So the people on this forum who have said they are voting for Trump aren’t Christians? I’m not even a Trump supporter, and I find this incredibly insulting and uncharitable (and I think it’s against forum rules)

And since you’ve appointed yourself arbiter of who is a Christian and who is not, how do you grade those who vote for a candidate (and in fact, a party) that promotes abortion on demand?
 
Social media issues, Hillary this week…
Google’s autocomplete function seems to be tilted in favor of Hillary Clinton, a report says, but the company denied that it skews results for any candidate.
Click to expand...
marketwatch.com/story/google-searches-for-hillary-clinton-yield-favorable-autocomplete-results-report-shows-2016-06-09
SourceFed also noted in its video that former Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt reportedly financially supports a data-analytics startup that is one of the major technology vendors for Clinton. While still executive chairman of parent company Alphabet, Schmidt has not had a day-to-day role at Google since stepping down as CEO in early 2011.
Click to expand...
 
chero23 said:
Warren went on a rampage.

Biden was calm and gave some great punches.

Ironically Trump didn’t tweet anything.
Click to expand...
I heard just a bit ago that he has tweeted: Pocohontas at it again. Goofey Elizabeth Warren. One of least productive members of Senate. Said she has a nasty mouth and he hopes she is VP pick.
 
FollowChrist34 said:
I think a lot of men will vote for Trump - all of them may not admit it - beyond the ones in the polls: college educated, middle class, younger (under 45), urban, suburbia especially. (mostly white but I put some blacks here too, even a few Hispanics who are assimilated, born in US, well-established, job, house, kids, etc.) Men don’t like Hillary Clinton. It is actually possible that Trump could win enough male votes to neutralize the high numbers of women voting for Clinton, the total number of which is actually quite a bit lower; the women doing this are mainly Hillary’s generation. It is also important to think of the states in play in terms of polling - the demographic makeup of those states.
Click to expand...
Just to go on the record. A white man here in a swing state who voted for Sanders but who will not vote for Trump. I will vote though and not for a 3rd party candidate who has no chance of being our next POTUS.
 
Sy_Noe said:
I heard just a bit ago that he has tweeted: Pocohontas at it again. Goofey Elizabeth Warren. One of least productive members of Senate. Said she has a nasty mouth and he hopes she is VP pick.
Click to expand...
Which was a response to what Warren said about him:

“Donald Trump is a loud, nasty, thin-skinned fraud who has never risked anything for anyone and serves nobody but himself. And that is just one of the many reasons why he will never be President of the United States.”
 
estesbob said:
Which was a response to what Warren said about him:

“Donald Trump is a loud, nasty, thin-skinned fraud who has never risked anything for anyone and serves nobody but himself. And that is just one of the many reasons why he will never be President of the United States.”
Click to expand...
Elizabeth Warren does seem to get under his skin.
 
Sy_Noe said:
Just to go on the record. A white man here in a swing state who voted for Sanders but who will not vote for Trump. I will vote though and not for a 3rd party candidate who has no chance of being our next POTUS.
Click to expand...
Smart man, even if you will cancel out my vote.
 
GaryTaylor said:
Sounds like racial indications and issues you probably should clarify as I have no idea what that means. But its sounds important to you.
Click to expand...
Here Gary Taylor for your clarification is what I was replying to.

“I think a lot of men will vote for Trump - all of them may not admit it - beyond the ones in the polls: college educated, middle class, younger (under 45), urban, suburbia especially. (mostly white but I put some blacks here too, even a few Hispanics who are assimilated, born in US, well-established, job, house, kids, etc.) Men don’t like Hillary Clinton. It is actually possible that Trump could win enough male votes to neutralize the high numbers of women voting for Clinton, the total number of which is actually quite a bit lower; the women doing this are mainly Hillary’s generation. It is also important to think of the states in play in terms of polling - the demographic makeup of those states.”

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13960174&postcount=895
 
Sy_Noe said:
Here Gary Taylor for your clarification is what I was replying to.

“I think a lot of men will vote for Trump - all of them may not admit it - beyond the ones in the polls: college educated, middle class, younger (under 45), urban, suburbia especially. (mostly white but I put some blacks here too, even a few Hispanics who are assimilated, born in US, well-established, job, house, kids, etc.) Men don’t like Hillary Clinton. It is actually possible that Trump could win enough male votes to neutralize the high numbers of women voting for Clinton, the total number of which is actually quite a bit lower; the women doing this are mainly Hillary’s generation. It is also important to think of the states in play in terms of polling - the demographic makeup of those states.”

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13960174&postcount=895
Click to expand...
Thanks for telling us, I mean who would have guessed? 😊 What does that have to do with you… “A white man here in a swing state who voted for Sanders but who will not vote for Trump.” And the significance of you “white” is still absent?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top