P
Path_Finder
Guest
I am sure there is a transcript of the debate on the internet if you want to see for yourself.Did she say them to Trump at the debate?
I am sure there is a transcript of the debate on the internet if you want to see for yourself.Did she say them to Trump at the debate?
I saw the debate. She didn’t. I have yet to have anyone tell me just what inappropriate questions it is that she asked.I am sure there is a transcript of the debate on the internet if you want to see for yourself.
I think her question was fine and Trump should answer better.I saw the debate. She didn’t. I have yet to have anyone tell me just what inappropriate questions it is that she asked.
Is she running for POTUS? Did she say them at the debate? If not, it doesn’t matter. He said what he said, trying to make it about her doesn’t change that.Trump shouldn’t have said those things but let’s not forget some things MK has as well, over at the gateway pundit, I won’t link to it, it is indeed explicit as when she was on the Howard Stern show.
Are they going to ask Candidate Clinton what she thought of her husband having sex with an intern in the oval office? Seems like it is an appropriate question if she wants to be President.Is she running for POTUS? Did she say them at the debate? If not, it doesn’t matter. He said what he said, trying to make it about her doesn’t change that.
I’m not a Clinton supporter or a Democrat but I don’t see how it’s equivalent to Trump being asked to clarify his own previous statements regarding women. What does Hilary’s husbands infidelity have to do with her qualifications to be POTUS? I’d rather have them call her out on Benghazi and her home email server and her stance on selling fetal body parts by Planned Parenthood.Are they going to ask Candidate Clinton what she thought of her husband having sex with an intern in the oval office? Seems like it is an appropriate question if she wants to be President.
It looked like Fox was trying to make Jeb Bush look like the nominee.
Notice: the Fox Debate Moderators only asked or directed the most embarrassing questions to Mr. Trump.
Fox Network doesn’t want Trump for President.
It looked to me the same. Megyn Kelly, or her bosses at Fox, don’t want Trump for President. She was reading from a script with questions they told her to ask to make Trump look bad. I don’t think that Trump ever said women were “disgusting animals” as she alleged. Also, the quote about women on their knees was from someone else on his TV show, although he commented on it jokingly. The debate was supposed to be between the candidates running for office and not between Trump and the moderators. There are intelligent journalists, but I never thought that Megyn Kelly was one of those.I think the moderators, especially the female one, had it out for Trump. …
The after debate show was just the commentators sympathizing with each other about how Trump was mean to them and how hard they worked on these questions. Totally uninteresting, and I thought another method to sway the voters. I don’t know why they don’t think that their hidden agendas shouldn’t be questioned. Like the press are above everyone? They’re the greatest reason this country is so messed up, because they sway the message so much and no one challenges them.
Megyn Kelly asked her “question” in a leading, provocative and indecent manner. She did it because she was playing the “girl card”, which is often played when you want to do something that is over the line.
It is an attempt to claim special privilege by virtue of your gender (and is also done by persons trying to do so by virtue of their race, religion, sexual preference or whatever else.) It is improper in all cases, and in the case of a Presidential Debate it is even more-so, because the person in question who we are all attempting to qualify for the job should be chosen purely on their merits.
Trump called Megyn on what she tried to do. He was both direct and, you can argue, quite crass about it, but that’s what you deserve when you try to playing the girl card in such a situation.
.
.
.
Sorry, but no. That is exactly what has been wrong with American Politics for a long time; it is arguably why nobody “dares” criticize President Obama without being risking named as a racist, it is why you can’t criticize Hillary without being called a gender bigot and other similar slams and slurs.
My take also.It’s time this horsecrap have the curtain called down on it and then burned with the protagonists of this tactic inside, and you get to go first because you wrapped yourself in it.
There are a few other nasty questions they could ask Hillary, but they won’t.Are they going to ask Candidate Clinton what she thought of her husband having sex with an intern in the oval office? Seems like it is an appropriate question if she wants to be President.
I’m thinking it’s something else. Seriously, Trump won’t win the Presidency. Fox and the rest of the GOP want him out of the nomination not because they’re afraid that he’ll win the Presidency (they’re not), but because they’re worried that the longer he runs, the more likely he will bring down the rest of the GOP with him and give the Presidency to Hillary. They probably see Trump as a plant by the Hillary campaign to get her elected.It looked to me the same. Megyn Kelly, or her bosses at Fox, don’t want Trump for President. She was reading from a script with questions they told her to ask to make Trump look bad. I don’t think that Trump ever said women were “disgusting animals” as she alleged. Also, the quote about women on their knees was from someone else on his TV show, although he commented on it jokingly. The debate was supposed to be between the candidates running for office and not between Trump and the moderators. There are intelligent journalists, but I never thought that Megyn Kelly was one of those.
On the show, Megyn Kelly said: " I do need a little attention. I like to be adored."Trump shouldn’t have said those things but let’s not forget some things MK has as well, over at the gateway pundit, I won’t link to it, it is indeed explicit as when she was on the Howard Stern show.
IF he does run independently, I won’t vote for him.Disgusting that they did that. As voter, it makes me wonder that they’re so worried about being politically correct that they can’t tie their shoes without checking the offense meter, or if they’re under Republican orders to undermine Trump.
IF he does run independently, it’s groups like this who are to blame.
Can you seriously say that in this universe Trump would have ANY chance at all of actually becoming President.As Path_Finder said, we have many months to go. Either Trump is going to pull a major Humpty-Dumpty, or he’s going to be a shoo-in for the nomination, and perhaps the White House.
What on Earth does that have to do with being President?Are they going to ask Candidate Clinton what she thought of her husband having sex with an intern in the oval office? Seems like it is an appropriate question if she wants to be President.
He’s way ahead of every other Republican candidate in the polls.Can you seriously say that in this universe Trump would have ANY chance at all of actually becoming President.
No way- no how- not in a million years.
Oh, I guess there is a %1 chance of him getting the GOP nomination but there is a 0% chance of him winning the general election.He’s way ahead of every other Republican candidate in the polls.
He’d be a million times better than Sanger award winner and candidate under an FBI criminal probe Hillary Clinton.Oh, I guess there is a %1 chance of him getting the GOP nomination but there is a 0% chance of him winning the general election.
Zero absolutely zero.
He’d lose worse than Dukakis!
You guys know it’s true.
That’s not what the post was about.He’d be a million times better than Sanger award winner and candidate under an FBI criminal probe Hillary Clinton.