Dramatic footage of a trendy bishop being booed by Mass-goers

  • Thread starter Thread starter ljubim
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What an appalling spectacle…this is I presume at the Procession to the foot of the altar…what wlould you have done?
 
ByzCath said:
That would be the Tea Bag Party.

Tea Bagger is a sexual euphemism and is very derogatory when describing this group.
Click to expand...
Now I thought a teabag was what you dunked in a nice hot cup of water…how on earth has it metamorphasised into some sleazy slang term
 
doanli said:
I hope the Pope is aware of this. If not, he should be.
Click to expand...
He probably was since the matter was referred to the nuncio, the Bishop disobeyed his 2007 instructions on the Latin Mass and the Bishop simply called B16 ‘him’ in a press conferece. Hope he gets appointed to a titular see.
 
FAB said:
I am truely wondering were tradtionalist on this site are coming from. Your are taking glee from the disobediance of the bishop? :eek:I thought you were all about pre-vatican II when the obsuluted obediance to ordinary wasn’t questioned.
The ordinary has the right to remove a priest at any time for any reason. His decision is to be resprected, disagreement handled in a civil way.
These threads that attack our ordinaries, take glee in thier falure are sinful and the work evil withinn the church.

Peace,
FAB
Click to expand...
So my thread is evil and sinful now? :confused: Even though the PAPAL NUNCIO told the Bishop to back down?

The opinions against this bishop’s action are in line with Rome. I don’t think it gets any clearer than that.

Please don’t be judgemental. It’s very distasteful and can cause even more unwanted divisions within the Church.
 
ProVobis said:
In remembrance of the historical Boston Tea Party.
Click to expand...
The Boston Tea party has nothing to do with “tea bagging” becoming a sexual euphemism, Pro Vobis.

In response to Zacdecat, what can I say? We live in a sick world. 🤷
 
MarineGuy said:
The Boston Tea party has nothing to do with “tea bagging” becoming a sexual euphemism, Pro Vobis.
Click to expand...
It was a slip on my part. If I now could, I’d delete that post. It probably shows the effect of hanging around with the wrong crowds. 🙂 You guys deserve better.
 
ProVobis said:
Wow is right. Is this the Catholic equivalent of the Tea Baggers Party?
Click to expand...
Tea Baggers? I think not. Tea Party or Tea Party participants. Tea Bagger is a vulger reference used by MSNBC journalists to mock those they disagree with.
 
ljubim said:
So my thread is evil and sinful now? :confused: Even though the PAPAL NUNCIO told the Bishop to back down?

The opinions against this bishop’s action are in line with Rome. I don’t think it gets any clearer than that.

Please don’t be judgemental. It’s very distasteful and can cause even more unwanted divisions within the Church.
Click to expand...
I don’t see were the Papal Nuncio did anything, but if you have link I’ll be happy top look at it.
Even if that is the case it’s up to the Vatican to take action, not for the faithful to take glee in it. If you are the same, then I stand by my statement.
The original blog from the UK is very one sided and also took great satifaction in seeing a “liberal” Bishop be opposed. Weather liberal or not the bishop is still in the line of the apostals and is due respect, not some kind of politacal rally and not in a church.

Peace,
FAB
 
FAB said:
I don’t see were the Papal Nuncio did anything, but if you have link I’ll be happy top look at it.
Even if that is the case it’s up to the Vatican to take action, not for the faithful to take glee in it. If you are the same, then I stand by my statement.
The original blog from the UK is very one sided and also took great satifaction in seeing a “liberal” Bishop be opposed. Weather liberal or not the bishop is still in the line of the apostals and is due respect, not some kind of politacal rally and not in a church.

Peace,
FAB
Click to expand...
The Vatican did take action 🙂
It’s my second or third post, the second article posted.

The bishop was out of line, and Rome set him straight. Just like other bishops have been out of line with Rome, and some became schismatics, so was this bishop directly defying an order from the Pope.

Things can only be fixed if the faithful spread the word for Rome to hear. Otherwise bad things can happen.
 
JBCatholicRN said:
Tea Baggers? I think not. Tea Party or Tea Party participants. Tea Bagger is a vulger reference used by MSNBC journalists to mock those they disagree with.
Click to expand...
Look, if you want the comment removed, please be my guest and request it be removed. It won’t bother me one iota. :mad:
 
JBCatholicRN said:
Didn’t mean to ruffle your feathers. 😃
Click to expand...
No, I managed to ruffle my own feathers. 🙂

I don’t mean to take the bishop’s side either, but this is a lynch mob, whether you call them Carpetbaggers or Scalawags or any other derogatory term. Or call them any flattering term, for that matter. But it doesn’t belong in the House of God.
 
ljubim said:
The Vatican did take action 🙂
It’s my second or third post, the second article posted.

The bishop was out of line, and Rome set him straight. Just like other bishops have been out of line with Rome, and some became schismatics, so was this bishop directly defying an order from the Pope.

Things can only be fixed if the faithful spread the word for Rome to hear. Otherwise bad things can happen.
Click to expand...
I went back and read the post.
It is still disturbing that so many want to celebrate first the distrespect of these parishers, any backing down he may at this point be doing, and the general glee of posters on this site and others.
The use of the EF of the mass was ment to give catholic another way to worship, to heal wounds. Traditionalist want to use it as a sign and a type of war cry to role back time.
Since from these very conservaitive post we can only get one side of the story, we don’t know how far this priest was pushing his ideas in violation of Rome, say trying to eliminate the use of the OF all together or teaching against Vatican II, I will continue to give the Bishop the benifit of the doubt.
For those who think his Holiness is rolling back the reforms of the council, think again. His actions have been to address some over zelious action as a result from the council, but the reforms went much deeper and wider than just the form of the mass.
Before the council, this type of uprising against a bishop would have been unheard of. It is only because of the reforms due to the council that the laity have any voice in church affairs.
Peace,
FAB
 
FAB said:
I went back and read the post.
It is still disturbing that so many want to celebrate first the distrespect of these parishers, any backing down he may at this point be doing, and the general glee of posters on this site and others.
The use of the EF of the mass was ment to give catholic another way to worship, to heal wounds. Traditionalist want to use it as a sign and a type of war cry to role back time.
Since from these very conservaitive post we can only get one side of the story, we don’t know how far this priest was pushing his ideas in violation of Rome, say trying to eliminate the use of the OF all together or teaching against Vatican II, I will continue to give the Bishop the benifit of the doubt.
For those who think his Holiness is rolling back the reforms of the council, think again. His actions have been to address some over zelious action as a result from the council, but the reforms went much deeper and wider than just the form of the mass.
Before the council, this type of uprising against a bishop would have been unheard of. It is only because of the reforms due to the council that the laity have any voice in church affairs.
Peace,
FAB
Click to expand...
By speculating about Fr. Michel you are also speaking badly about the Church hierarchy.
I can tell you dislike the Latin Mass based on your posts, so I will just pray for you.
God bless.
 
By speculating about Fr. Michel you are also speaking badly about the Church hierarchy.
Click to expand...
I’m not bad mouthing the good father, just speculation since we don’t know the full story. He may be totally innocent, but for a bishop to take action, there seems there would have to be more going on than just using the EF of the mass.
I can tell you dislike the Latin Mass based on your posts, so I will just pray for you.
God bless.
Click to expand...
Thank you for you prayers, but your assumtion would be wrong. I don’t dislike the Latin form it’s just not my preference. I understand the reasons behind the pontiff’s decision to allow it to be used, to try to heal some wounds a small poputaltion of the faithfull felt when it’s use stopped and to reconnect with the SSPX.
Unfortunately it has not neither. The action has given false hope to traditionalist to a full return to the EF and the SSPX has basically thumbed thier nose at the pope.

My prayer is unity of the faithful to be able the celebrate both the OD and the EF and to realize the real fruits of Vatican II beyond what form the mass takes. We live in a world of growing secularizm which is a greater threat to our faith. Our eccumentlism seems to ave to start within the church. It’s the reason why Pope Benidict has been working for reunification with the East, the Angletons, and the SSPX types.
Peace,
FAB
 
FAB said:
I understand the reasons behind the pontiff’s decision to allow it to be used, to try to heal some wounds a small poputaltion of the faithfull felt when it’s use stopped and to reconnect with the SSPX.
Click to expand...
But those were not the reasons that Pope Benedict gave in S.P. nor in “The Spirit of the Liturgy”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top