Drinking alcohol and smoking pot – what are your thoughts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christian_Unity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does football, basketball or hockey?
Does going to the movie theatre?
Does eating dessert?
What about wearing baseball caps?

Lots of things we do neither honour God, nor make us holy - yet they are not sinful.
are you a real canadian?i’ve met your type before I suspect that you are one of those posters here that pretend to be a canadian,but you’re not.you true identity will be known reading between your lines very soon. I have read similar posters like you in the past and maybe yo re back.i know you’re an ex canadian.,who is now anti canadian.just to reiterate,pls refrain from duping posters that you are canadian.i dealt with you before
 
CU,
I have read several of the post that you have posted during this discussion and I find it insulting that you use statements like “you know Catholics drink a lot”. This is a blanket statement and like most blanket statements, it simply is not true. I am sure you know Catholics who do in fact consume alcohol, but I also know many Catholics who do not consume alcohol other than to receive the Precious Blood at Mass.

There are many Catholics who beleive that the downside to consuming alcohol outweighs the few benefits associated with alcohol. Therefore it is not unusual to find Catholics who abhor alcohol and the effect that it has had in their families or on society as a whole.

I personally hate blanket statements and I felt compelled to point this out.

Peace.

Stan
 
Does football, basketball or hockey?
Does going to the movie theatre?
Does eating dessert?
What about wearing baseball caps?

Lots of things we do neither honour God, nor make us holy - yet they are not sinful.
Triumphguy, I know you are aware of this more than most.

1 Corinthians
19 Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your bodies. Scripture does not talk about football games…(Go Notre Dame). It does however say that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit and that we honor God with our bodies. If you want to believe that smoking pot does so…then I would say we will disagree. Inhale if you believe that the Holy Spirit would find no offense. For me, nah 🙂
 
CU,
I have read several of the post that you have posted during this discussion and I find it insulting that you use statements like “you know Catholics drink a lot”. This is a blanket statement and like most blanket statements, it simply is not true. I am sure you know Catholics who do in fact consume alcohol, but I also know many Catholics who do not consume alcohol other than to receive the Precious Blood at Mass.

There are many Catholics who beleive that the downside to consuming alcohol outweighs the few benefits associated with alcohol. Therefore it is not unusual to find Catholics who abhor alcohol and the effect that it has had in their families or on society as a whole.

I personally hate blanket statements and I felt compelled to point this out.

Peace.

Stan
Well, it’s a known fact that Catholics drink more than Protestants in America based on our churches view on alcohol. Now if we are talking about Italy and European countries with Catholics, I would say those Catholics drink a lot more in comparison to American Catholics. Even the Filipino Catholic icon Manny Pacquiao has his alcoholic drink commercials.
 
Another blanket statement.

I am not sure it is “a known fact that Catholics drink more than protestants in America”. Where did you get that from? I know many evangelical communities claim to not partake of alcohol, but that may or may not be the actual practice.

I know may protestants who drink and I know many protestants who do not drink. I know many Catholics who drink alcohol while I know many Catholics who do not drink any alcohol, save at Communion.

Have a great evening all,

Stan
 
Triumphguy, I know you are aware of this more than most.

1 Corinthians
19 Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your bodies. Scripture does not talk about football games…(Go Notre Dame). It does however say that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit and that we honor God with our bodies. If you want to believe that smoking pot does so…then I would say we will disagree. Inhale if you believe that the Holy Spirit would find no offense. For me, nah 🙂
I’m just having a dialogue;)

OK so is pot better, worse, or just different from alcohol in terms of damaging the body (which as we know is the Temple of the Holy Spirit)?
 
CU,
I have read several of the post that you have posted during this discussion and I find it insulting that you use statements like “you know Catholics drink a lot”. This is a blanket statement and like most blanket statements, it simply is not true. I am sure you know Catholics who do in fact consume alcohol, but I also know many Catholics who do not consume alcohol other than to receive the Precious Blood at Mass.

There are many Catholics who beleive that the downside to consuming alcohol outweighs the few benefits associated with alcohol. Therefore it is not unusual to find Catholics who abhor alcohol and the effect that it has had in their families or on society as a whole.

I personally hate blanket statements and I felt compelled to point this out.

Peace.

Stan
Here you go:

indiana.edu/~engs/articles/cathprot.htm
 
Another blanket statement.

I am not sure it is “a known fact that Catholics drink more than protestants in America”. Where did you get that from? I know many evangelical communities claim to not partake of alcohol, but that may or may not be the actual practice.

I know may protestants who drink and I know many protestants who do not drink. I know many Catholics who drink alcohol while I know many Catholics who do not drink any alcohol, save at Communion.

Have a great evening all,

Stan
Here you go:

indiana.edu/~engs/articles/cathprot.htm
 
I’m just having a dialogue;)

OK so is pot better, worse, or just different from alcohol in terms of damaging the body (which as we know is the Temple of the Holy Spirit)?
I defer to the Dr Coptic but from what I read…alcohol in moderation can be positive…ie, a glass a red wine a day being good for the heart. Now science is saying that it’s not just red wine that other alcohol has the same positive effects (or is it affects?). Moderation is key…I’ve had friends who’ve had alcohol problems and again, hold nothing against someone who chooses not to drink. Better not to drink than to abuse it for sure. It’s those that don’t eat ice cream that I find offensive. 😛
 
Here’s an article from the same professor advocating lowering the drinking age from 19 to 18.

indiana.edu/~engs/articles/cqoped.html

Saying in part:
The legal drinking age should be lowered to about 18 or 19 and young adults allowed to drink in controlled environments such as restaurants, taverns, pubs and official school and university functions.
Sorry, I watched enough 18 year old high school students die traveling from Illinois to Wisconsin 30 years ago so that they could drink in taverns. Many died on I-94 on their way back home after an evening of (un)controlled drinking. Been there, done that…young people died.
In these situations responsible drinking could be taught through role modeling and educational programs. Mature and sensible drinking behavior would be expected.
Yes, and no one will have more than one 8 once, 3.2 beer. Please pass and share the peanuts.
This opinion is based upon resaerch that I have been involved in for over twenty years concerning college age youth and the history of drinking in the United States and other cultures.
Yes…two problems here…High school seniors are 18 years old and your research only goes back 20 years. It needs to go back farther and explore why did numerous states raise the drinking age from 18 to 21. :hmmm:
 
CU -

I googled top states for beer consumption… here’s the USA TODAY TOP 10 list. These states are all protestant. Not one Catholic in them. Well of course I joke. 😃 I then looked at Wiki to get their % of population, protestant verses Catholic. All states are protestant, some heavily so except New Hampshire and even then, only marginally so. So this must mean that its the protestants doing most of the beer drinking. I think us Catholics lean more to the wine…😃

The top ten states in beer consumption per capita as reported in USA Today:
  1. New Hampshire (Catholic 35%, Protestant 32%** ) ** does not include unspecified of 5%…
  2. North Dakota (Catholic 30%, Protestant 54%)
  3. Montana (Catholic 24%, Protestant 55%)
  4. South Dakota (Catholic 25%, Protestant 61%)
  5. Nevada (Catholic 27%, Protestant 46%) * P includes unaffiliated of 20%
  6. Wisconsin (Catholic 29%, Protestant 50%)
  7. Vermont (Catholic 26%, Protestant 29%)
  8. Texas (Catholic 28%, Protestant 36%)
  9. Nebraska (Catholic 28%, Protestant 61%)
  10. Delaware (Catholic 9%, Protestant 54%)
 
Every criminal has an excuse… “I don’t want to be a criminal” is, well, a very lame one. :ehh: I don’t trust any of them who sell to adults today, let alone children. When you walk away from God, you walk away and will find other vices. Conversion of the heart and soul is needed. On that I think we can agree… perhaps?
They don’t “want to be criminals”, though, they want to make money selling pot. Right now that is a criminal activity, but they would much prefer it to be legal. If it’s legal they’re not looking to find some new criminal activity to participate in. You are assuming here that selling pot is a “vice”, but it’s simply a criminal activity supplying a “vice”; selling pot isn’t an activity that people seek out for a thrill or get addicted to.
Nay. It hasn’t worked for cigarettes and alchohol. This is a supply and demand issue…the issue starts with the demand. Basic economics: lowered prices will only increase its use…
Actually, regulation on cigarettes and alcohol HAVE lowered youth use of these drugs. Youth use of alcohol and tobacco are far lower in the U.S., where access is restricted by age, than in places like Russia where it’s not. Kids can still get a hold of it, but it’s much harder when it’s legal and regulated.
you are assuming that the cartels will not respond by lowering their prices. If it is that profitable they will fight for their marketshare no matter what the price.
The point is that it won’t be profitable to compete with legal growers. These laws were written specifically to undercut the black market, and have scaling tax levels and fees to adjust down if needed to push out the black-market dealers. The cost of illegal pot will always be higher than legal pot, all things being equal, because of the added cost of smuggling, bribes, guns, ect. The mafia didn’t keep a big hand in the liquor market after Prohibition ended precisely because it wasn’t worth it. They moved into other markets, but they’ve never come close to replacing the revenue they made from liquor, and the U.S. mafia has declined significantly because of it, as did bootleggers.

This is just one blow against drug cartels, but it is potentially a very serious blow. However, price it higher than today’s street prices and this will only keep the cartels coming across the border. Either way, the cartels are a criminal element meeting a demand.
And the discussion above sidesteps the fact that pot is morally evil to begin with. Look at the side affects. Does smoking pot honor God and make us Holy? No. Not even close.
You’ve not yet responded to the fact that the side-effects you listed are the same as those of alcohol, yet alcohol use is moral. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that smoking pot gives honor to God, at least in most cases, though neither does having a beer when watching a football game. You can give thanks to God when you have a drink, or a smoke, however.

Peace and God bless!
 
CU -

I googled top states for beer consumption… here’s the USA TODAY TOP 10 list. These states are all protestant. Not one Catholic in them. Well of course I joke. 😃 I then looked at Wiki to get their % of population, protestant verses Catholic. All states are protestant, some heavily so except New Hampshire and even then, only marginally so. So this must mean that its the protestants doing most of the beer drinking. I think us Catholics lean more to the wine…😃

The top ten states in beer consumption per capita as reported in USA Today:
  1. New Hampshire (Catholic 35%, Protestant 32%** ) ** does not include unspecified of 5%…
  2. North Dakota (Catholic 30%, Protestant 54%)
  3. Montana (Catholic 24%, Protestant 55%)
  4. South Dakota (Catholic 25%, Protestant 61%)
  5. Nevada (Catholic 27%, Protestant 46%) * P includes unaffiliated of 20%
  6. Wisconsin (Catholic 29%, Protestant 50%)
  7. Vermont (Catholic 26%, Protestant 29%)
  8. Texas (Catholic 28%, Protestant 36%)
  9. Nebraska (Catholic 28%, Protestant 61%)
  10. Delaware (Catholic 9%, Protestant 54%)
Notice how many of them are heavily German. Plenty of German Catholics, you know. And Germans drink beer. 😉
 
You’ve not yet responded to the fact that the side-effects you listed are the same as those of alcohol, yet alcohol use is moral. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that smoking pot gives honor to God, at least in most cases, though neither does having a beer when watching a football game. You can give thanks to God when you have a drink, or a smoke, however.
Hi Ghostly, I did not intend not to respond. I’m not clear that the side effects are the same. That said, alcohol use in moderation is fine. Scripturally, Jesus drank wine and he indicated the moral issue is when its use results in drunkeness. Science even shows that there are health benefits in red wine in reducing the risk of heart disease. Recent science is even saying that other forms of alcohol offer the same protection. Bloomberg article below.

bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-22/drinking-moderately-may-help-prevent-heart-disease-studies-say.html

😉
 
Notice how many of them are heavily German. Plenty of German Catholics, you know. And Germans drink beer. 😉
The only German that I know that does not like beer is my wife. She does like chocolate liqueur and Baileys though… 🙂
 
Hi Ghostly, I did not intend not to respond. I’m not clear that the side effects are the same. That said, alcohol use in moderation is fine. Scripturally, Jesus drank wine and he indicated the moral issue is when its use results in drunkeness. Science even shows that there are health benefits in red wine in reducing the risk of heart disease. Recent science is even saying that other forms of alcohol offer the same protection. Bloomberg article below.

bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-22/drinking-moderately-may-help-prevent-heart-disease-studies-say.html

😉
And moderate marijuana use would be fine as well. So long as one isn’t using it to the point of inhibiting reason and judgement, it’s not a moral problem.

Read any medical report about the effects of alcohol and they are the same, except for the lung damage which only comes from certain forms of marijuana usage anyway. This one gives some of the effects of alcohol, and there are actually many more negative effects from alcohol than marijuana. In fact, I can say from experience that it’s pretty much a given in medical studies that marijuana is much safer than alcohol (you can’t die directly from marijuana use, for example), and alcohol is quite literally a lethal psychoactive poison that is generally consumed in small doses, while marijuana is a non-lethal psychoactive substance. Alcohol abuse has obvious and permanent effects on many bodily systems, while marijuana abuse after teenage years does not appear to, though with further study we may discover some yet-unknown permanent effects.

Peace and God bless!
 
They don’t “want to be criminals”, though, they want to make money selling pot. Right now that is a criminal activity, but they would much prefer it to be legal. If it’s legal they’re not looking to find some new criminal activity to participate in. You are assuming here that selling pot is a “vice”, but it’s simply a criminal activity supplying a “vice”; selling pot isn’t an activity that people seek out for a thrill or get addicted to.

Actually, regulation on cigarettes and alcohol HAVE lowered youth use of these drugs. Youth use of alcohol and tobacco are far lower in the U.S., where access is restricted by age, than in places like Russia where it’s not. Kids can still get a hold of it, but it’s much harder when it’s legal and regulated.

The point is that it won’t be profitable to compete with legal growers. These laws were written specifically to undercut the black market, and have scaling tax levels and fees to adjust down if needed to push out the black-market dealers. The cost of illegal pot will always be higher than legal pot, all things being equal, because of the added cost of smuggling, bribes, guns, ect. The mafia didn’t keep a big hand in the liquor market after Prohibition ended precisely because it wasn’t worth it. They moved into other markets, but they’ve never come close to replacing the revenue they made from liquor, and the U.S. mafia has declined significantly because of it, as did bootleggers.

This is just one blow against drug cartels, but it is potentially a very serious blow. However, price it higher than today’s street prices and this will only keep the cartels coming across the border. Either way, the cartels are a criminal element meeting a demand.

You’ve not yet responded to the fact that the side-effects you listed are the same as those of alcohol, yet alcohol use is moral. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that smoking pot gives honor to God, at least in most cases, though neither does having a beer when watching a football game. You can give thanks to God when you have a drink, or a smoke, however.
Peace and God bless!
Ghost,

So that I understand you…

Alcohol is legal and in moderation moral. Alcohol in excess may be immoral and lead to immorality.

Pot is illegal.

Thank you God for my being alive as I drink this beer that is legal that I am drinking in moderation.

Thank you God for my being alive while I smoke pot that is illegal and I break the law, knowing you want me to be holy and abide by the law.

Is this how you see it?
 
Ghost,

So that I understand you…

Alcohol is legal and in moderation moral. Alcohol in excess may be immoral and lead to immorality.

Pot is illegal.

Thank you God for my being alive as I drink this beer that is legal that I am drinking in moderation.

Thank you God for my being alive while I smoke pot that is illegal and I break the law, knowing you want me to be holy and abide by the law.

Is this how you see it?
I’m saying that there is nothing inherently immoral about moderate pot use; the legality is a different matter entirely since we’re discussing legalization anyway.

In a few days it won’t be illegal in Washington to use pot, and Federal law will be essentially non-applicable to users, so the matter at hand is the inherent morality of use, not the relative circumstance of legality. In short, is it immoral to use moderately if it’s legal, and also whether or not it should be illegal at all.

Peace and God bless!
 
I’m saying that there is nothing inherently immoral about moderate pot use; the legality is a different matter entirely since we’re discussing legalization anyway.

In a few days it won’t be illegal in Washington to use pot, and Federal law will be essentially non-applicable to users, so the matter at hand is the inherent morality of use, not the relative circumstance of legality. In short, is it immoral to use moderately if it’s legal, and also whether or not it should be illegal at all.

Peace and God bless!
Ghosty,

So because Washington legalizes it you actually believe that Federal law is non-applicable, is this your understanding? If so, you are wrong.
 
Ghosty,

So because Washington legalizes it you actually believe that Federal law is non-applicable, is this your understanding? If so, you are wrong.
It will be as inapplicable as any other law that is “on the books” but is not enforced and can’t be convicted in court. Kind of like it being illegal to be in possession of wire-cutters outside of your own property in Texas, or wiggling your hips while dancing in California. With jury nullification of the Federal laws almost guaranteed, and the resources being wasted on such efforts in any event, the Feds do not enforce, nor attempt to enforce, drug laws on individual users (and they’ve already indicated explicitly that this is the case).

It is illegal under Federal law for people to use marijuana for medical purposes as well, but the Feds have likewise indicated that they have no intention nor real power to go after individual medical users; the law, in that instance, is a dead letter just as the Texas and California laws mentioned above, and an unenforced, unenforceable law is not a law as the behavior is allowed.

Whether or not the Feds will go after registered growers and distributors remains to be seen, but I’m speaking of personal use. I do think the Feds would be foolish to go after registered growers and distributors when they allow personal use, however, because then they will just be cutting a check to the drug cartels. They understand this with regards to medical marijuana, which is why the Federal law against marijuana doesn’t exist for all intents and purposes in those states which have legalized medical use.

Peace and God bless!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top