Dutch Feminazis Want to Punish Educated Mothers

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Brendan:
What makes you think it’s a hateful term?
Click to expand...
Are you serious?

I can explain it for you, but I can’t understand it for you.
 
Penny Plain:
Are you serious?

I can explain it for you, but I can’t understand it for you.
Click to expand...
Always referring to things as hateful needs to stop. I hate that…😦

So what if it appears hateful? Enough of this PC BS.
 
Penny Plain:
Are you serious?

I can explain it for you, but I can’t understand it for you.
Click to expand...
Yes, I am serious

If one ascribes the term ‘feminazi’ to a person promoting what one percieves as a feministic form of facism, how would that be hateful?

Or are you somehow aware of the OP’s emotional state and can detect the level of ‘hate’ in a way that I cannot?
 
40.png
FiremanFrank:
Careful there etienne …

Because if those regulations were enforced as stringently as you would have liked …

Then those same regulations would most likely have already been enforced against you.

Think about it.😉
Click to expand...
Who says that they haevn’t been?
 
As both facism and feminism have the same core which is Leftist social engineering with a disordered affinity for things like streilization, euthanasia and abortion, the shoe fits.

Scott
 
The radical feminist worldview, goals, tactics, and rhetoric can all be linked directly to Marxist-Leninist theory.

Feminist-socialist Simone de Beauvoir, said in her famous 1974 interview in The Saturday Review:
*
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” *
 
Sure I’ll agree to quit using Feminazi if everyone agrees to quit using the word abusive or chauvinist.
 
If the government pays for the education, then they have the right to expect something in the form of higher taxes paid or productivity gain from the expenditure. It’s only fair to those who paid the taxes to pay for that education in the first place.

I’m not sure I’m on board with penalizing them, but making them pay back their education money is fair if they are out of the workforce for a long time like > 6 years (the first is free because of maternity leave).

And they would have to do something about those not using their education as well (say a PhD waiting tables).
 
40.png
a_cermak:
If the government pays for the education, then they have the right to expect something in the form of higher taxes paid or productivity gain from the expenditure. It’s only fair to those who paid the taxes to pay for that education in the first place.

I’m not sure I’m on board with penalizing them, but making them pay back their education money is fair if they are out of the workforce for a long time like > 6 years (the first is free because of maternity leave).

And they would have to do something about those not using their education as well (say a PhD waiting tables).
Click to expand...
What, exactly, is more beneficial to society that bearing and raising it’s future citizens?
 
OK so looking at it from another point of view…
While educated women are out working as not to waste their education, who is having the babies? I would venture to guess it is the un-educated women. WHile this is not any sort of put down… does this lower the future ambition for education? Or…would it be just as politically incorrect to say they are genetically “dumbing” down their country? They are shooting themselves in the foot if they penalize educated women for staying at home with their babies. Don’t they know that those first few years are sooooo important to how that child will learn? Am I the only one seeing it from this perspective?
 
My knowledge of Catholic teaching regarding worker’s rights is a little sketchy, but I can’t imagine it supports the idea that the state can help with someone’s education and then tell them they are obligated to indentured servitude or pay us back.
 
I lived in Holland for 5 years. The people there are good and honest people, but recently, especially since the 1960s their society is collapsing even more spectacularly than in the US and the rest of Europe. The dutch have allowed soft drugs, prostitution etc in the name of tolerance. Now that tolerance has come full circle and the wrong people are driving the culture there. Its almost completely secular now.
Those who benefited from tolerance are now showing their intolerance of others. Dutch parliamentarians want to force educated mothers to leave their children, but that you know that it has also been suggested in the Dutch parliament that they force poor and uneducated women(so-called irresponsible women) to have abortions.
Pray for that country
 
40.png
BlestOne:
OK so looking at it from another point of view…
While educated women are out working as not to waste their education, who is having the babies? I would venture to guess it is the un-educated women. WHile this is not any sort of put down… does this lower the future ambition for education? Or…would it be just as politically incorrect to say they are genetically “dumbing” down their country? They are shooting themselves in the foot if they penalize educated women for staying at home with their babies. Don’t they know that those first few years are sooooo important to how that child will learn? Am I the only one seeing it from this perspective?
Click to expand...
Hmmmm :hmmm: - It is not true that uneducated mothers have lower IQ children.
 
40.png
buffalo:
Hmmmm :hmmm: - It is not true that uneducated mothers have lower IQ children.
Click to expand...
No, that isn’t what I was implying…I am sorry if it sounded that way. Let me try to butcher my words again. Of the un-educated women there are bound to be a percentage that just isn’t interested or ambitious about education, and there will certainly be some that are well…not gifted intellectually. If they mandate that educated women have to work and not spend time having and rearing babies, doesn’t it stand to reason that there would be a decrease in intellectually gifted and motivated babies and an increase in the percentage of less than gifted and less motivated children, not an increase in numbers but in percentage? I guess what I am getting at is that if the parents are unmotivated, many times they don’t encourage their children to seek higher education. At the same time, there are people who are not gifted intellectually and they would be wise not to seek higher education. So if they punish educated women for what they call wasting their education, I believe that this will affect some (not all) of the educated women to have less children.

I know that there are under educated women in all societies. They are not less motivated or less intelligent by any means. I am not saying that they would produce less intelligent babies…just that the percentage of educated women giving birth going down could affect the overall percentages.
 
And many of those women who have not sought higher education AND are having more babies are Muslim. The culture of the Netherlands is going to change drastically in a very short time.
 
Yet another attack on the Family.

Keep women out of the home and in the workplace:

Because our society WORSHIPS MONEY !!!

-Future EDUCATED Housewife and Proud of It 🙂
 
*“I guess what I am getting at is that if the parents are unmotivated, many times they don’t encourage their children to seek higher education.” *

That’s very true! My mother wasn’t educated and so she didn’t encourage any of us to get an education. My two younger sisters are slaving away at low paying jobs, hardly able to pay their bills (one dropped out in 8th grade) because they were never encouraged to seek an education. If they have kids will they encourage their kids to seek an education? Probably not.

How many times does this situation take place within a family when the mother is uneducated? I honestly wonder.

I’d have to guess that an educated mother produces educated children - and then encourages them to carry on with their education after they graduate.
 
You would someone punished for staying at home and rasing thier own child? Ludicris is an understatement.
40.png
EtienneGilson:
I think that the title is a little inflamatory and goes against any number of forum regulations which only seem to be enforced periodically.

Common sense tells us that if the government provides education it has a right to expect some social production from that education. In the military they have a very similar system in the USA where the government is not as involved in higher education. If you study X number of years, you are expected to provide X number of years of service. To call this ‘Feminazi’ is a liitle over the top. The sheer fortune the western governments spend (except the USA) on higher education is a social contract. A woman who studies medicine for 8 years will have racked up a debt to the government (at least in Canada) for her education of nearly half a million dollars. It is likely higher here in Europe since tuition and other expenses are financed more by the governments of Europe.
Click to expand...
 
:clapping:
40.png
Brendan:
What makes you think it’s a hateful term?

If a person is promoting a Feministic Fascism, then the term is applicable.
Click to expand...
 
Maybe we should lock her in a room full of kids of different ages and see how she handles feeding, entertaining, teaching, caring for and cleaning up after all of em.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top