Dynamic Catholic Under the Microscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phillip_Rolfes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone have any experience with Dynamic Catholic and their products, or know anything about the goings on there?
I think this discussion has gotten away from the intent of the original post. Just discern for yourselves and trust in God.
 
It is a company, with a faith-based mission. How do you think he publishes and distributes his products?

He writes most of the books that the company sells. Should he not be paid for his work?

I work for a non-profit. It isn’t the same a charitable organization.

The article didn’t actually say that he has done anything wrong, it only implied that things are improper because he makes a lot of money and drives a nice car. That is calumny.
 
“Dynamic Catholic’s board recognizes the ‘perceived conflict of interest’ between Kelly’s business interests and the nonprofit organization, Caster said, noting that it has been thoroughly examined by third-party experts and even the Attorney General of Ohio.”

“One longtime Catholic publisher believes Kelly is ‘walking on thin ice’ ethically. ‘He has two pockets,’ Cullen Schippe, who spent 46 years in book publishing, said of Kelly: ‘He takes money out of one pocket and puts it in the other pocket.’"

Even if the arrangement is not ‘technically illegal,’ Schippe said, ‘it certainly is slick.’"

This all boils down to a Perception Issue.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if that Catholic publisher would have a problem if Matt Kelly had his books published by him? 🤔
 
Of course not! That would be very profitable 🤑

And, of course, much more appropriate and ethical 💸💰💵
 
I’ll give you that, it definitely has the scent of yellow journalism throughout.

I’m just curious, truthfully, why are you all so defensive of Matthew and against this article? Is it mainly the Perception Issue?
 
Last edited:
Well I don’t know enough about his accounts, or the business world in general, to know if there is anything unethical going on. Besides that, he hasn’t been charged with any wrongdoing. Furthermore, he claims that his businesses and non-profit have been scrutinized by third parties and the Ohio AG, who found nothing wrong.
 
Last edited:
I’m just curious, truthfully, why are you all so defensive of Matthew and against this article?
Most of us have read his books and seen him in person. He seems to be authentic and have good intentions. The article is little more than speculation and I don’t think that it answered anything.
 
It also seems deceptive to say that he has sold 30 million (or whatever that number is) books, when it’s not really individuals buying them, it’s bulk discounted purchases for parishes.
 
It would be deceptive if he said “over 30M people have read my books.” He has sold that many, and the churches hand them out to parishioners. He probably has a higher ratio of sales-to-readers than most of the New York Times political best sellers. I’ve seen a few of his books in church garage sales, but never boxes of them at Costco.
 
We really do have to consider the source of the article.
The National Catholic Reporter.

The article comes off as a hit piece.

I personally detest the constant attacks on orthodox (small O) Catholic personalities and organizations lately…Raymond Arroyo, EWTN, Cardinal Sarah, Steubenville, Pope Emeritus Benedict, National Catholic Register, Ignatius press, Saint Pope John Paul, etc. etc.

The fact that they ( NCR) publish an article like this about him makes me question the sources, facts and intent of the article.

I will say that his series on Confirmation was extremely helpful, orthodox, engaging (video based) and offered a a very affordable price.
 
Last edited:
If 10,000 parishes are using his confirmation program, is someone vetting his theology? Why does he have so much influence – more so than other Catholic writers, contemporary or past? Is his program really that much better than others? Is his material better than that of other Catholic publishers, such as Ignatius?
 
Oh, my stars, he may have mis-used “half” for “step”. Call the Inquisition.
 
If 10,000 parishes are using his confirmation program, is someone vetting his theology?
It’s the responsibility of the pastor to determine which, if any, confirmation program is used. So, apparently 10,000 pastors don’t have a problem with his theology…
 
If 10,000 parishes are using his confirmation program, is someone vetting his theology?
Did you miss this? Someone is “vetting” his work.
From the link you provided:

UPDATE: I have received further correspondence from Matthew Kelly. The request for the Imprimatur was submitted late and has taken longer than usual, but he says the next printing will carry an Imprimatur.”
 
The pastors often defer that responsibility to their directors of religious ed (many of whom are volunteers, and most of whom don’t have adequate theological training to properly vet programs). That’s just the reality of the situation, and not a comment on the content of the Confirmation program itself.

That being said, Dynamic Catholic is usually quick to point out that their Confirmation program is being used in 10,000 parishes “in some capacity.” It’s often not used as the primary program, but as a supplement to the primary program since the program itself is not on the list of USCCB approved programs and many dioceses require their primary catechectical programs to be on that list.
 
That request was submitted several years ago after the book was published. To date, the imprimatur has yet to be issued for that book (or any other books published by Matthew Kelly since).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top