T
ThatOneGuy92
Guest
Nothing quite like a nice cuppa, is there Phillip?Indeed. I’ll be watching this with a nice cup of tea in one hand. :compcoff:
Nothing quite like a nice cuppa, is there Phillip?Indeed. I’ll be watching this with a nice cup of tea in one hand. :compcoff:
Yes indeed. A nice cuppa tea and an entertaining theological/historical argument and I’m set for the week!Nothing quite like a nice cuppa, is there Phillip?![]()
Hahahaha!!! For me it depends on the discussions going on. But the ones of late have been good.Set for the week? I say, good sir, 'tis but a daily occurrence for me.
funnymama.com
Verily so.Hahahaha!!! For me it depends on the discussions going on. But the ones of late have been good.![]()
FYI - this is a thread about Eastern CATHOLICISM’s relationship with Western THEOLOGY & TRADITION (at least that’s how you started it).For those who might be tired …
The thread was not started by me but the moderator was rearranging posts from two difft threads and thus chose the title ,from existing posts - may be a lofty title, that seems rather beyond my reach !FYI - this is a thread about Eastern CATHOLICISM’s relationship with Western THEOLOGY & TRADITION (at least that’s how you started it).
What does that have to do with interfaith communion, the subject of your post?
My , my …shows my limitations in communicating !And, Josephene , are you in favour of intercommunion with people of churches which do not hold to the teaching that in Communion we ARE receiving the Body and Blood of our Lord and Saviour ?
This Communion that we receive is not symbolic - it IS the Body and Blood of Christ
Note that this is not the sole basis of intercommunion. There are at least 4 communions of valid Apostolic Churches today that do not have, or at least have very limited, intercommunion.And, Josephene , are you in favour of intercommunion with people of churches which do not hold to the teaching that in Communion we ARE receiving the Body and Blood of our Lord and Saviour ?
This Communion that we receive is not symbolic - it IS the Body and Blood of Christ
Are you equating receiving the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony with “choosing carnal lust over chastity and strength”? Unless I’m misunderstanding you, that is very hurtful to both the Eastern Catholics and the Orthodox, not to mention anyone in any apostolic church who is married.and The Church rightly tell us that inorder for such to happen , at the best possible level in a manner that would benefit the whole Church and all others too , such and such are the dispositions needed - including trust in The Lord, enough to know that He can give us the grace ,to put trust in His words of absolution , if we have broken our realtionship …that those who have chosen carnal lust over capacity to be chaste and strong , in His grace , have the grace work on those areas , may be through spiritual communion, before they come to Him , with distrust …and so on …
Is that directed at my question?Stop feeding…
No, at the OP. You should be more carefree, I wouldn’t call you a troll.Is that directed at my question?![]()
Those words were about use of artificial contraception , esp. among Catholics who are advised to consider it as 'mortal sin ’ , in the realm of sort of denying the Lord’s intended power , to help persons to be strong .Are you equating receiving the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony with “choosing carnal lust over chastity and strength”? Unless I’m misunderstanding you, that is very hurtful to both the Eastern Catholics and the Orthodox, not to mention anyone in any apostolic church who is married.
Thank you for clarifyingThose words were about use of artificial contraception , esp. among Catholics who are advised to consider it as 'mortal sin ’ , in the realm of sort of denying the Lord’s intended power , to help persons to be strong .
God bless !
Thank you too , for caring enough to want to clarify , without pompous , mocking attitude , allowing for the joy of trolling along, in The Fleet of The Master FisherMan !Thank you for clarifying![]()