W
whyeyeman
Guest
I don’t think that’s the only alternative mate!
Thanks for letting the cat out of the bag. I think you’ve proved my point.we began celebrating his 500th anniversary with his birthday in 1983
I hate to say it, but I’ll second what Spyridon has stated. I was very surprised at the attacks by many EO. To me it was far worse than ones from Protestants for the very reason that EO should know better. They know Church history and can’t deny the Catholic Churches place in Western Christendom, even if they are repulsed by the papacy. It’s unfortunate since in my point of view, Ecumenism and reunification with the EO makes the most sense. Doctrinally and historically many of the differences can be reconciled. The Eastern Rite Catholic Churches is a perfect example.The anti-Catholic EO also are usually fanatically anti-Western, maniacally anti-Ecumenism, and ferociously against any sort of change or reform whatsoever.
I was born in 1992, and with all due respect, Martin Luther? “Witness of Jesus Christ”? Well I suppose I should schism from the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church and one day I may earn that title right? I would never do that though because I certainly don’t celebrate those like Martin Luther.It was in 1983 that the Church acclaimed Martin Luther as “Witness of Jesus Christ”. I happen to remember it like yesterday.
Why Martin Luther’s? of all people?I’ve never encountered an instance where the occasion of a birth or the anniversary of a birth is paired with any other word than “celebrate.” We celebrate their birthday.
Australianity? What’s an Australian poster supposed to look like? Whether you like it or not, I am Australian and the personal attacks only show you can’t refute what I’ve said.I have doubts about the Australianity of that particular chatter.
My responses to Don_Ruggero.what am I meant to be refuting?