L
Lost_Sheep
Guest
Is Edward Snowdon a hero for exposing the U.S. Government’s policy of collecting telephone data from its citizens, or a traitor for leaking “secret” information?
And why should they care?It is impossible for me to believe he could not have gone to some congressman or to the Inspector General.
They might not. But in the context of discovering that an administration has tasked the IRS with blocking and harassing its political opponents, I would think they would be now.And why should they care?
Neither did the Founding Fathers when they got tired of British Rule, declared independence and decided they could govern themselves. In the eyes of the British, the FFs decided they didn’t have to follow the law either.He decided that HE was above Congress, the administration and the judiciary. HE alone could decide what was right and what was wrong. HE decided that he didn’t have to follow the law.
Which founding sought asylum in China, again?Neither did the Founding Fathers when they got tired of British Rule, declared independence and decided they could govern themselves. In the eyes of the British, the FFs decided they didn’t have to follow the law either.
One man’s revolutionary is another man’s patriot.
Did you really just compare this guy to the founding fathers? Really?Neither did the Founding Fathers when they got tired of British Rule, declared independence and decided they could govern themselves. In the eyes of the British, the FFs decided they didn’t have to follow the law either.
One man’s revolutionary is another man’s patriot.
Has he given enemies aid? Very likely. Anyone who reveals secret anti-terrorist programs is giving aid to terrorists.18 USC § 2381 - Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.Has he levied war against the US? No
Has he agreed to the enemies of the US? Not to my knowledge.
So I can’t call him a traitor.
I think you are looking at this all wrong. It is disconcerting not that he merely went to China, but that the current state of America pushed him to go to China of all places. If he fled to a country allied with the USA and with less “muscle” that country could be pressured into giving in to extradition. Reports are that he has now left Hong Kong, and Russia or Iceland may grant him asylum.I’m on the fence until we know more. He may have done the public a very great service, but the fact that he ran to CHINA, who engages in a massive amount of hacking and computer espionage against the US is extremely suspect.
How, exactly? The government has already announced that they monitor terrorist communications. They know nothing now that they didn’t already know.Has he given enemies aid? Very likely. Anyone who reveals secret anti-terrorist programs is giving aid to terrorists.
Peace
Tim
AgreeHow, exactly? The government has already announced that they monitor terrorist communications. They know nothing now that they didn’t already know.
YesOr is the American public the enemy? If that is the case, he definitely providing aid.
So far, he seems to believe he did what is right. He gave up up quite a bit for what what right.He disclosed classified info. That does not automatically equate to treason.
Our Constitution is being shredded in the name of anti-terrorism. The real enemy is in Washington DC.