R
rlg94086
Guest
**Moreover, the term “Pro-choice” is really a misnomer, because **it assumes that choices have no qualitative difference. ****In other words, “Pro-choice” implies that the choice to abort or the choice to spare a child’s life are no different— neither choice is good or evil; it’s just one’s “personal decision,” after all.
This is the primary point IMO. That is why I constantly remind people of slavery in our history. Can you imagine if the pro-slavery party… oh hey…same party!…had come up with “pro-choice” back then? Would anyone have thought they weren’t pro-slavery, when their argument was that the states should have a right to choose? Of course not!
When one of your “choices” is intrinsically evil, the laws should be changed to take away that “choice.” Certainly, the killing of an innocent, unborn, human child is worthy of such legal protection. It isn’t enough to just work towards educating others and trying to decrease the killing.![]()