Election over, administration unleashes new rules

  • Thread starter Thread starter scipio337
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“Elections have consequences”.

I for one am surprised to see the AP cover this:

hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_REGULATIONS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-12-13-03-21-05

Let the deluge of job-killing government overregulation begin! At some point, we might be able to stop blaming Boosh. At what point does the (inherited) “worst economy since the Great Depression” become the President’s economy?

I can’t wait to see what type of foriegn policy changes we will see since the President is now “more flexible” after the election.
I’m not surprised that Obama halted regs to stop the screeching of the extremely pro-death, anti-environmental camp, but am very pleased he is doing a few pro-life things, considering he is somewhat of a pro-death person himself, being for legal abortions and all.

Now if he would just have the guts to get on the bully pulpit and talk about climate change and other environmental harms that harm and kill people (and others of God’s creatures) and how we (households and businesses) can mitigate these in cost-effective ways that save us $millions, without lowering productivity or living-standards (even increasing these), while greatly helping the economy, that would be a truly surprising miracle, considering he’s pretty much in the pockets of big coal and oil, like nearly every other politico, esp Inhofe, the most evil of them all.
 
Slavery was abolished by the 13th amendment and you don’t see people enslaving anyone “underground” because its illegal, do you?

Unfortunately yes, sadly, slavery is alive and doing well in our modern world.
antislavery.org/english/
Here’s another org working against slavery in the US and around the world:
iabolish.org/

Another important point is the near slave and horrible workshop conditions of workers in many poor countries that make the very products we buy. Out of sight, out of heart and mind.

I have this video clip from TV about those horrible conditions in SE Asia, and then a colleague gave my husband a copy of his “Mardi Gras: Made in China” docu about the horrible work conditions there. The 2nd part of it shifts to Mardi Gras in New Orleans (it was made some years before Katrina), where people used and threw away the cheap beads and trinkets made in China at such great human cost, with a bulldozer having to scooping them up the next day from the streets. Reminded me of the bulldozer scooping up emaciated people in “Soylent Green.”

Not to mention the cancer alleys in China (from another docu), and that their environmental harms and costs exceed their GDP just to satisfy our profligate desire for throw-away junk made by throw-away people – China is going backwards fast. And don’t get me started on amputated Africans and bling.

People may wonder what in the bleep BXVI is talking about in his “Caritas in Veritate,” but if one becomes aware of all the exceedingly grave harms from our current global economic system, then they will understand BXVI’s concern. He is not just pope of rich heartless (see no evil) Americans, but pope of all Catholics around the world, and concerned about all people around the world and the terrible injustices and harms in which they are enmeshed. But who listens to him? Not rich American Catholics. That’s for sure.
 
I am wondering , who is your perfect someone willing to head our nations Government?
What a tremendous undertaking of leadership.,(over three hundred million people) of all factions that make us what we are in this great nation. Who is it? Hard is it not?

So we can’t settle for your perfect someone…an imperfect electorate chose an imperfect leader. It is done!
So can we not all, or at least we contributing to CA threads, hope and pray for the best possible leadership out of our chosen President. Is not our hope for the best out any one of us?Can we not all admit to being sinners as well?
Peace, Carlan
 
I am wondering , who is your perfect someone willing to head our nations Government?
What a tremendous undertaking of leadership.,(over three hundred million people) of all factions that make us what we are in this great nation. Who is it? Hard is it not?

So we can’t settle for your perfect someone…an imperfect electorate chose an imperfect leader. It is done!
So can we not all, or at least we contributing to CA threads, hope and pray for the best possible leadership out of our chosen President. Is not our hope for the best out any one of us?Can we not all admit to being sinners as well?
Peace, Carlan
“Perfect” is the enemy of “good”. We may never get “perfect” leadership.

See my sigline. This president isn’t above criticism, and it’s instances like these where it almost behooves us to point out these shortcomings (not to mention the atrocious pro-abortion, anti-conscience record.
 
Yep, I can’t wait until Caesar Obama exhausts the treasury like the grand Nero and the bread and circuses run out…let the suffering begin.
 
“Perfect” is the enemy of “good”. We may never get “perfect” leadership.

See my sigline.
This president isn’t above criticism
Scipio,of course he is not , none of us are when it come to the sin in our lives and the damage it does not only to ourselves but to others. We can and do point out the sin in others when it is recognized but only God knows and judges the whys and wheres ,the reasons buried in the deep recesses of ones soul. He hates the sin but loves the sinner and his mercy is great.We must trust him in all things to bring about good in everything.
Peace, Carlan
 
I’ m not attacking you, I’m trying to get you to see the logic of your posts. There is no “messy” shade of gray. Science tells us the conceived egg is a human being with distinct DNA. Those who are pro-abortion and pro-euthanaisa are trying to make this “messy.”

Killing in self-defense is not murder. Killing a defenseless life in the womb is.

It’s really that simple.
Killing as death penalty is not self defense. It is the killing of an often broken, poor(can’t afford a lawyer) and unfortunate individual whose life has been on a downward spiral. For every hard-bitten killer how many are like that?
Just as war in Iraq was not self-defense because we knew there were no weapons of mass destruction. What were the motives? Many and varied…some good…some misguided…some more cynical. Either way, many, many innocents were killed and life is still chaotic.
My son is vegan - his concerns may not even register on your radar if you’re a meat-eater.
Many people in your country don’t believe in your god.
My point is: NO it’s just NOT that simple. All messy shades of grey and our leaders have to deal with it.
 
Killing as death penalty is not self defense. It is the killing of an often broken, poor(can’t afford a lawyer) and unfortunate individual whose life has been on a downward spiral. For every hard-bitten killer how many are like that?
Don’t forget all the actually innocent people in the US executed – some we find out about later, other we may never find out about. Sort of reminds me of Jesus and his execution.

At any rate it is found that the death penalty either increases the murder rate in the states that institute it, or has no effect on lowering the murder rate. The message society gets from the death penalty is — if you don’t like someone, kill 'em. And we Americans are very famous for that. Shoot first and ask questions later. Don’t mess with Texas. Any Hatfield (or Iraqi or Muslim-looking person) will do.
Just as war in Iraq was not self-defense because we knew there were no weapons of mass destruction. What were the motives? Many and varied…some good…some misguided…some more cynical. Either way, many, many innocents were killed and life is still chaotic.
I for one was totally against the war in Iraq, and also Desert Storm, which also needlessly killed a tremendous number of people…many who had Saddam Hussein’s gun at their backs, forcing them to line up along the border. One Iraqi-American guy was just there in Iraq visiting his grandmother when he was conscripted and forced into that line up – he even waved his University of Chicago sweatshirt. All killed and mowed down. I REALLY can’t understand why Americans are not totally ashamed of that. Except we are a kill, kill, kill people, starting with Native Americans. It’s just who we are.

Many of the supposedly anti-abortion people in America are actually pretty much pro-death in nearly every other area of their lives. It’s very easy to be anti-abortion, when it’s no skin off one’s nose. Most anti-abortion people are also anti tax and anti-environment; they are against helping save the lives of the children once they are born, and also against helping reduce miscarriages caused by environmental harms. In other words, they are NOT really pro-life by any stretch of the imagination, and I for one suspect they are not really anti-abortion, but just use that issue to support their de facto pro-death political candidates’ other nefarious agenda, and/or to feel self-satisfied.

One of the first things they do is deny local pollution causes miscarriages and other harms, and I’m sure there will be those denying the findings of this report: The Toll from Coal (since that is the response here re env regs) – see catf.us/resources/publications/view/138 .

They also deny climate change and all its harms and killing of people. They think it’s a hoax to control people, since few are willing to lift their fingers to turn off lights not in use or the myriad of other things we can and should be doing out of the goodness of our hearts that not only saves us money, but also saves lives by reducing local, regional (acid rain), and global env harms.

So if the gov wants to inspire us to do the right thing by, say, taking away the subsidies and tax-breaks from coal, oil and gas, people yell out “they’re putting us in chains,” bec they are (let’s face it) addicted to these harmful substances, as Bush rightly said before leaving office.
My son is vegan - his concerns may not even register on your radar if you’re a meat-eater.
Good for him. Eating low on the food chain is not only good for one’s health and reduces killing of animals (and St. Francis said those who would treat animals badly would also treat their fellow men badly), it also reduces environmental harms that kill and harm people, and allows many more people to get a healthy diet from the same amount of land and resources used. It could help solve the world hunger problem. We do have some Catholic vegans right here on CAF, but they are not many (see forums.catholic-questions.org/group.php?groupid=90 ).

I just want you to know that I have NEVER considered Americans to be Christian. At first as a small kid I thought they were just being hypocrits – going to church on Sunday, then promptly forgetting what they heard on Monday. However, as a teen I began to realize they are not hypocrits, they are very true to their religion – Americanism. And now in old age I well understand the roots of this Americanism religion. It is in the 18 c. Enlightenment anti-gov, anti-Church philosophies which developed in Europe and perhaps for good reason at the time (due to increasing socio-political complexity and unreasonable and excessive oppression by the gov and the Church), but were taken over to a much higher degree here in the U.S. and have been taken to an extreme blind ally of world destruction. Many Americans are incapable of thinking outside the anti-gov, anti-Church Enlightenment box, even though the sciences and social sciences have long left behind the mistaken aspects of Enlightenment thinking.
 
We must also must keep in mind that the vote of one who supported Obama despite his support of unrestricted taxpayer-funded abortion on demand counts the same as a vote of one who voted for him because of his support for unrestricted taxpayer on demand and both votes support abject evil. There simply is no way that one can reconcile such a vote for the teachings of the catholic church. there is no amount of good a candidate can do to mitigate their support of abortion. such a person is morally unfit to hold any position of leadership and should never be supported by people who recognize abortion for the evil that it is
That isn’t true. As Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Ratzinger said:

“When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favor of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.”

The abortion issue doesn’t have to be all end all of elections. A Catholic person CAN, in good conscience, vote for a candidate who does not oppose abortion so long as they aren’t voting for them because they don’t oppose abortion.
 
That isn’t true. As Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Ratzinger said:

“When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favor of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.”

The abortion issue doesn’t have to be all end all of elections. A Catholic person CAN, in good conscience, vote for a candidate who does not oppose abortion so long as they aren’t voting for them because they don’t oppose abortion.
Again with this? How about re-reading the last two words of his statement.
 
Again with this? How about re-reading the last two words of his statement.
Which are to be left for the voter to decide. I’d say that social justice and welfare is a proportionate reason. The guilt trips people try to inflict on Democratic voters here is unjustified.
 
Which are to be left for the voter to decide. I’d say that social justice and welfare is a proportionate reason. The guilt trips people try to inflict on Democratic voters here is unjustified.
And again, you are left defending a position that somehow “social justice and welfare” outweigh 1.5+ million innocent deaths each year. How?
 
And again, you are left defending a position that somehow “social justice and welfare” outweigh 1.5+ million innocent deaths each year. How?
Because more than 300 million lives are at stake and, in my view, the concerns of those already born outweigh those which aren’t and may never be. These are matters left by the Church to individual conscience and it is not for anyone here or anywhere else to pass judgements or level accusations of having committed sin or being less Catholic against those who make similar choices. If you’d like to discuss it further then you’re welcome to start a new thread. This one should get back on track.
 
Don’t forget all the actually innocent people in the US executed – some we find out about later, other we may never find out about. Sort of reminds me of Jesus and his execution.
Some who get the death penalty in prison are innocent, but it’s probably a very small percentage compared to the guilty who are being punished justly and receiving the due reward for their deeds. If Jesus would have absolutely been against the death penalty he would have said so. And neither can an absolute prohibition of the death penalty be found anywhere else in Sacred Scripture.

**Luke Chapter 23 **

39 One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!”
40 But the other rebuked him, saying, “Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation?
41 And we indeed justly; for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.”
42 And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.”
43 And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”
 
Because more than 300 million lives are at stake and, in my view, the concerns of those already born outweigh those which aren’t and may never be. These are matters left by the Church to individual conscience and it is not for anyone here or anywhere else to pass judgements or level accusations of having committed sin or being less Catholic against those who make similar choices. If you’d like to discuss it further then you’re welcome to start a new thread. This one should get back on track.
Sorry, the right to life is a primary right. All other rights are contingent on it. Without it, no other rights have meaning. Including “social justice and welfare.”

Which is the greater evil: an intentional death of a known innocent or the denial of material needs of another?
 
Sorry, the right to life is a primary right. All other rights are contingent on it. Without it, no other rights have meaning. Including “social justice and welfare.” Which is the greater evil: an intentional death of a known innocent or the denial of material needs of another?
That is a matter of conscience left to individual choice of belief. Like I said; we can continue the discussion in another thread.
 
That is a matter of conscience left to individual choice of belief. Like I said; we can continue the discussion in another thread.
No reasonable person would struggle to answer that. And certainly no well formed conscience would fail to discern the greater evil.
 
Which are to be left for the voter to decide. I’d say that social justice and welfare is a proportionate reason. The guilt trips people try to inflict on Democratic voters here is unjustified.
You are right. It’s unfortunate that folks seek to use guilt and even fear to intimidate fellow Catholics to vote as they wish.

I am just pleased that the election did not go their way.
 
Because more than 300 million lives are at stake and, in my view, **the concerns of those already born outweigh those which aren’t **and may never be.
What you said goes directly against Church teaching. Show me where it says in the Catechism of the Catholic Church or in any papal encyclical that the lives of people who are already born are worth more than the lives of babies in the womb. Did you know that Pope John Paul II said that we should call abortion murder because that’s what it is? Or maybe I should ask if you care what the Church teaches.
 
What you said goes directly against Church teaching. Show me where it says in the Catechism of the Catholic Church or in any papal encyclical that the lives of people who are already born are worth more than the lives of babies in the womb.
I quoted Cardinal Ratzinger, then Prefect of the Congregation For The Doctrine of The Faith. Its an issue of individual conscience and no further proof is required IMO. Again, this isn’t an abortion thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top