Elizabeth Smart's father announces he is gay

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmaz
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
He probably was but bowed down to the pressure to get married.

Aren’t all Mormons required to get married in order to attain the highest level of heaven?
 
It’s certainly an expectation but as Catholics we are hardly guilt free when it comes to this. I can’t help but feel that the single state is still looked upon with suspicion (and dare I say pity) unless one is widowed or a ‘pious’ in some way.
 
I agree.

But to be honest, the Catholic Church never required marriage of its members in order to attain salvation.

The Mormon church requires marriage in order to achieve the highest levels of heaven, pretty much saying that single people are second class beings who can only attain second best.

The Catholic Church on the other hands honors celibacy for the sake of the kingdom.

Big difference.
 
Last edited:
Horton: I read an article yesterday stating that he had kept the secret from his family for all of his marriage, just as I expected.
A few years ago I met a Catholic guy. He was going through an intense bunch of marriage counseling with his wife. She apparently caught him sinning (I didn’t get the details), and he confessed he had always had same-sex thoughts/feelings/issues, even before he got married. He said he hoped having a wife would make it all better, but it didn’t. He was relieved his lifetime of lying about who he is, was over. But he was terrified about what admitting this meant to the future of his marriage.

(Had I thought of this forum, I would have asked him if the evil Mormons brainwashed him into finding a Catholic girl to marry. Actually, no I wouldn’t have, that would have been unhelpful and a bit stupid.)
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the very thorough response. I’m looking forward to seeing how it compares with LDS replies.
 
Catholics believe marriage is a sacrament. However, we also believe that it is a choice, not an obligation and certainly not required for heaven.

I don’t see how Matthew 19:4-6 is a commandment to get married. It’s about not getting divorced.

We believe there is no marriage in heaven because Jesus told us so.

Why does LDS teaching go against what Jesus taught?
 
When I lived in Utah, I was in Utah County in a counseling office waiting room. A young man in his twenties came out of his appointment and the woman behind the desk handed him a book.

The title was about same sex attraction. It was so odd how she had it on her desk waiting for him. It seemed as if she had a stash, but I’m not sure of that.

What used to really throw me off were some of the couples I would see when shopping at IKEA. There were many men that were really, really into the pillows and decor. Way more than their wives. “It” was a topic of conversation at work as well.

Purely anecdotal but very real experiences nonetheless.
 
Do you want the LDS version or the true version? I’ll give you the true version. Joseph Smith had a problem with marriage fidelity. He had affairs behind his wife’s back. But he knew this couldn’t fly for long, him being the prophet and all, so he had a “revelation” that God was instituting plural/eternal (celestial) marriage. This revelation later became known as Section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants, which is canon scripture in Mormonism. Joseph kept this revelation secret for some time and started marrying other women, a lot of other women…somewhere around 50 before he died, including women already married to other men and at least one 14 year-old, probably more.

Joseph tried to keep this secret from his first wife, Emma, because he knew she would most definitely not approve. She did eventually find out and was furious. She confronted him about it and demanded that he stop. So instead of doing the right thing, Joseph doubled down and had another revelation from God that Emma must accept his additional wives or face destruction. Well, apparently Emma didn’t like the sound of that, so she reluctantly capitulated. This wasn’t the only time Joseph used a threatening “revelation” to get someone to bend to his will. He did the same thing to some of the other women he wanted to marry.

To answer your first question, D&C Sect 132 is the reason eternal marriage is necessary to reach the celestial kingdom. It’s all nonsense of course, but in Mormondom it’s taken very seriously, although not fully–but that’s another topic.

As to your second question, no, in Mormondom it’s not enough for a woman to stay single and live for Jesus. The only way to the celestial kingdom is to marry in the temple. Mormons claim that if you don’t you will have the chance to do so in the afterlife, but if a single LDS woman told her family or friends that she wanted to stay single and live for Jesus, they would look at her like she’s crazy.

In the beginning, polygamy was kept to the inner circles of Mormon leadership. But when Brigham Young took over and moved the religion to Utah, he went full-on polygamy and took it to a whole other level. Being so far away from the authority of the U.S. government allowed him to do whatever he wanted, but even that did not last.
For an accurate portrayal of this topic please read the book Joseph Smith’s Polygamy: Toward A Better Understanding.
 
Catholics believe marriage is a sacrament. However, we also believe that it is a choice, not an obligation and certainly not required for heaven.

I don’t see how Matthew 19:4-6 is a commandment to get married. It’s about not getting divorced.
How do Catholics who choose to remain single keep the never-revoked commandment to multiply and replenish the Earth?
We believe there is no marriage in heaven because Jesus told us so.

Why does LDS teaching go against what Jesus taught?
I already responded to the claim that Jesus taught there will be no marriage in Heaven. He only said no new marriages will be performed in Heaven. Why does Catholic teaching go against what Jesus taught? Are there other verses that haven’t yet been mentioned in this thread to which Catholics appeal on this matter ? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
How do Catholics who choose to remain single keep the never-revoked commandment to multiply and replenish the Earth?
If the Catholic Church is in the wrong for not requiring that we all should get married and multiply, then so is Jesus. He himself proposed celibacy for the Kingdom.

He himself never got married and had children.
 
Why does Catholic teaching go against what Jesus taught?
Did Jesus teach that everyone should get married? No

Did he condemn people for not getting married? No.

He did condemn pride, greed, hypocrisy, but not singleness. Besides why should he condemn someone whose state in life is a product of forces beyond his or her control? Not all people who want to get married can get married.

He himself taught celibacy for the sake of the kingdom, nor did he condemn single people to a lesser afterlife, unlike the Mormon church.
 
Last edited:
How do Catholics who choose to remain single keep the never-revoked commandment to multiply and replenish the Earth?
Since the very first of those who chose to remain unmarried & celibate for the kingdom were those who walked with Jesus, I would assume they heard it from him directly.

As far as the command (not commandment) to multiply and replenish the earth, where does it say ALL people should do this?
Why does Catholic teaching go against what Jesus taught?
Catholics do not go against the teaching of Jesus on this. Jesus does teach that there are some who should not marry and obviously, through sacred tradition, we know that unmarried celibate life is perfectly acceptable way of life.

If marriage was a requirement to enter the highest level of heaven, how do you explain Jesus reaching it? He never married, never fathered children. So by LDS theology Jesus would not be on the highest level of heaven. Can you explain that?
 
As far as the command (not commandment) to multiply and replenish the earth, where does it say ALL people should do this?
Genesis 9:1 God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them: Be fertile and multiply and fill the earth.

How many times does the commandment have to be given to individuals before we realize the commandment is for all?
 
If the Catholic Church is in the wrong for not requiring that we all should get married and multiply, then so is Jesus. He himself proposed celibacy for the Kingdom.

He himself never got married and had children.
A fair point. I believe there is no credible evidence that Jesus was married and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not claim to know that He was. They’re very well may be special circumstances where someone is unable to marry in this life. Jesus’ mission may very well have been so important that marriage would have interfered during his short life. However this discussion started based on the problem Elizabeth Smart’s mother possibly could encounter by losing her spouse in this life. The answer is that if she remains faithful and is unable to marry in this life she will have the opportunity in the next. Such would be the case with anybody who has a special assignment in this life to further God’s work, including Christ. I hope this helps…
 
Praying for all of them. I know many former Mormons who either came out, or had their spouses come out. It’s a very painful situation for all.

Given time, and a lot of prayer, many do heal and move on. But it is devastating when one lives a life contrary to their authentic self. Mormon, Catholic, or whatever
 
Thanks Gazelam, for your accurate explanation of Mormon teaching.
 
Catholics believe Jesus is essential for our salvation while it seems that LDS believe it is marriage and procreation.

Jesus, starting with the early Church, gave women the right to choose to remain unmarried and devote their life to serving God as a celibate. For the first time women had a say in their destiny and were not treated as property!

The Catholic Church gives women a choice in their vocation: enter the religious life, live as a celibate, or marry and be open to life.

Jesus gave women the choice and that is why the Catholic Church does as well. It’s not up to men to decide which vocation a woman chooses. It is up to her and God.
 
A fair point. I believe there is no credible evidence that Jesus was married and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does not claim to know that He was.
October 6, 1854, Orson Hyde of the Quorum of the Twelve discussed the Savior’s wedding recounted in the Bible:

“…Jesus was the bridegroom at the marriage of Cana of Galilee, and he told them what to do. Now there was actually a marriage, and if Jesus was not the bridegroom on that occasion, please tell who was. If any man can show this, and prove that it was not the Savior of the world, then I will acknowledge I am in error. We say it was Jesus Christ who was married, to be brought into the relation whereby he could see his seed, before he was crucified.” (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 2, p. 82, 83).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top