F
findingmyself08
Guest
I can’t quite agree with the statement that eschatological concerns are disappearing into the sacramental haze. Mass itself tends to point toward the end of time. Just read the Eucharistic prayer. Mass is also the closest we can come to how we will praise and worship God in heaven. Frankly, the Mass and other sacraments and venerating Mary are part of our existence as Catholics. Sacraments bring us closer to God and tend to lead us to think about eschatological concerns.In this part of the world (Australia) the church gives almost no importance to the end times. The one thing which all Catholics should be yearning for–the second coming of Christ (as a king this time, not as a sacrifice) which will put an end to war, sickness, hatred, evil and death itself–is almost brushed aside. Eschatological concerns tend to disappear in the sacramental haze. The veneration of Mary is almost an obsession. Why else would the Assumption stand alongside Christmas day as the only two non-Sunday Holy Days of Obligation? The second, glorious coming of Christ is a footnote to theology. It gets the briefest mention at Mass–something about “we wait in joyful hope for the coming of our Saviour, Jesus Christ.” No we don’t. We don’t wait in “joyful hope” at all. We keep going through the motions of the Mass and the other sacraments, and praying to Mary, as if they are the focus of our existence.
Actually, in my experience it has been the opposite. More as, “Oh it will happen one day, but it hasn’t happened yet. Be prepared. Keep your mind focused on God. For we do not know the day or the hour it will come. It will come like a thief in the night.” While most Catholics may not be able to tell you who that prophet is, I can almost surely bet you that they have heard their prophecies at some point in their life during the Liturgy of the Word at Mass. And you’re right, Jesus was a prophet (priest, prophet, and king) and sometimes that aspect is downplayed compared to his other roles as priest, savior, and king. But even those “sugary statements” tend to point toward the end of time. It is about preparing ourselves - mind, body, and soul - for the final judgment. And most of those passages about love and forgiveness are not sugar-coated. Jesus did not sugar coat anything - he did not say any of it would be easy.The attitude to the second coming is like, “Oh, it will happen one day, but it’s been a long time, don’t you know. It could be another 2000 years, so why worry?” I’ll bet most Catholics have no idea of the prophecies of the Old Testament (Daniel, Ezekiel, etc) because Catholic teachings are so heavily focused on the New Testament. Jesus himself was a major prophet, but his prophecies become lost in a blancmange of sugary statements about forgiveness and love. Sure, those things are important, but they only present one aspect of Jesus. He preached those worthy ideals, but he also had a far more rigorous side, a part of him that had an eye to the future. He spoke of the end times and throwing the rubbish out and keeping the good stuff (okay, those are my words); cutting out your eye if it causes you to sin, giving everything away to the needy. His conditions for salvation were stern and unequivocal.
The things you’ve heard Catholic priests say (other than the first one, not sure about that one) are things I would expect a priest to say. But not with the same sentiment that you assume. We’ll look at the last two statements:I’ve heard Catholic priests say things like:
“The kingdom of God is in your heart.”(What, so it’s just a good feeling I have? There’s no second coming?)
“Jesus conquered evil when he died on the cross.” (I mean–what?? Conquered evil? Gosh, there must be no more evil anywhere in the world.)
“Every Eucharist is the return of Christ among us” (So celebrating the Eucharist gives us an excuse to ignore the prophecies of the second coming?)
Honestly, I am sick to death of these meaningless platitudes and feel-good statements. I call it a blancmange because it looks good but has no substance. It’s as if (to me) the church has lost much of its purpose. Nobody wants to confront difficult ideas any more because the dwindling parishioners might be frightened.
“Jesus conquered evil when he died on the cross.” You take this to mean that because of Jesus’ death, there is no evil in the world. This is obviously not true as there is much evil in the world. BUT what is possibly meant is that Jesus has conquered death by creating a way for us to obtain salvation. Because of Jesus’ sacrifice, we no longer defeated by death itself - we can now have eternal life with God in heaven if we choose to do so.
“Every Eucharist is the return of Christ among us.” I do not think this statement has anything to do with ignoring the second coming of Christ. The Eucharist IS a return of Christ among us because it is not only for praise and thanksgiving of God and his wonderful works, it is also a remembrance of Jesus’ sacrifice for us. So, once again, it actually points to the end of time.
But you are right in a sense, although this has been around for most of human history - people are afraid of the truth and of difficult ideas. Why? Because they are difficult. They are difficult to understand, difficult to deal with, and difficult to believe (at times). But Jesus (as you have pointed out) never said faith would be easy. In most cases, he has said the opposite - it will be hard. And fear also drives people from thinking about these things because it makes them question their own mortality. Because despite wanting to be with God in heaven, we all have to realize that in order to do so, we must die. To me, that would be hard for people to accept and that is why I think most parishioners would prefer to avoid or ignore eschatological concerns.